Car comparison

Lotus Evora Sports Racer 3.5 V6vsPorsche Cayman (981C) S 3.4

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Lotus Evora Sports Racer

3.5 V6

350 hpGasolineRWDManualSuperchargedCoupe2012-2015
VS

Porsche Cayman (981C)

S 3.4

325 hp3436 ccGasolineRWDDual-clutchNaturally aspiratedCoupe2013-2016

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Lotus Evora Sports Racer 3.5 V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    286 km/h
    178 mph
  • Most powerful
    350 hp
    261 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    244 hp/t
    182 kW/t
    4.1 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    66/100
  • Best performance score
    73/100
  • Best practicality score
    50/100

Porsche Cayman (981C) S 3.4

  • Lightest
    1,370 kg
    3,020 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.2 L/100 km
    28.7 mpg US
    34.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    11.4 L/100 km
    20.6 mpg US
    24.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.3 L/100 km
    37.3 mpg US
    44.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    190 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    780 km
    485 mi
  • Best economy score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelLotusEvora Sports Racer3.5 V6PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4
Power
350hp261kW
325hp242kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
370Nm273lb-ft
Curb weight
1,436kg3,166lb
1,370kg3,020lb
Gross weight-
1,695kg3,737lb
Top speed
286 km/h
178 mph
281 km/h
175 mph
To 99% top speed
69.0s99% target: 283 km/h / 176 mph
Calculated
66.0s99% target: 278 km/h / 173 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.6s
4.9s
0-200 km/h
14.9s
Calculated
15.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.4s
Calculated
4.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
14.2L/100 km16.6mpg US19.9mpg UK
11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.6s
Calculated
12.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
244hp/t182kW/t111hp/1000 lb
Calculated
237hp/t177kW/t108hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
279Nm/t186lb-ft/ton
Calculated
270Nm/t181lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
606km377mi
Calculated
780km485mi
Calculated
Displacement-
3,436cc210cu in
Length
4,361mm172in
4,380mm172in
Width
2,047mm81in
1,801mm71in
Height
1,229mm48in
1,295mm51in
Wheelbase
2,575mm101in
2,475mm97in
Trunk volume-
425L
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
2
Fuel tank
60L
64L
CO2 emissions
229g/km
190g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Lotus Evora Sports Racer 3.5 V6Porsche Cayman (981C) S 3.4PowerTorque
  • Lotus Evora Sports Racer 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
  • Porsche Cayman (981C) S 3.4: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
LotusEvora Sports Racer3.5 V67,000 rpm4,500 rpm7,250 rpm
PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.47,400 rpm4,500-5,800 rpm7,650 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricLotusEvora Sports Racer3.5 V6PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.4 s
4.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.6 s
4.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
14.9 s
15.5 s
Top speed
286 km/h
178 mph
281 km/h
175 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
5.5 s
5.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.3 s
8.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.7 s
10.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.6 s
12.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
185 km/h
115 mph
183 km/h
114 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LotusEvora Sports Racer3.5 V6
350 hp
261 kW
PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4
325 hp
242 kW

Lotus Evora Sports Racer 3.5 V6 has 25 hp more than Porsche Cayman (981C) S 3.4.

The biggest power difference is between Porsche Cayman (981C) S 3.4 and Lotus Evora Sports Racer 3.5 V6: 25 hp (19 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LotusEvora Sports Racer3.5 V6
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4
370 Nm
273 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LotusEvora Sports Racer3.5 V6
1,436 kg
3,166 lb
PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4
1,370 kg
3,020 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LotusEvora Sports Racer3.5 V6
286 km/h
178 mph
PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4
281 km/h
175 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LotusEvora Sports Racer3.5 V64.6 s
PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.44.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lotus Evora Sports Racer 3.5 V6 and Porsche Cayman (981C) S 3.4: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LotusEvora Sports Racer3.5 V6
9.9 L/100 km
23.8 mpg US
28.5 mpg UK
PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche Cayman (981C) S 3.4 and Lotus Evora Sports Racer 3.5 V6: 1.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LotusEvora Sports Racer3.5 V6
244 hp/t
182 kW/t
4.1 kg/hp
PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4
237 hp/t
177 kW/t
4.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LotusEvora Sports Racer3.5 V6
606 km
377 mi
PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4
780 km
485 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
LotusEvora Sports Racer3.5 V6
350 hp
261 kW
4.6 s
286 km/h
178 mph
PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4
325 hp
242 kW
4.9 s
281 km/h
175 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
LotusEvora Sports Racer3.5 V6
Power
350 hp
261 kW
0-100 km/h4.6 s
Top speed
286 km/h
178 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,361 mm
171.7 in
Height
1,229 mm
48.4 in
PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4
Power
325 hp
242 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
281 km/h
175 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
425 L
15.0 cu ft
Length
4,380 mm
172.4 in
Height
1,295 mm
51.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
LotusEvora Sports Racer3.5 V6
Power
350 hp
261 kW
0-100 km/h4.6 s
Top speed
286 km/h
178 mph
9.9 L/100 km
23.8 mpg US
28.5 mpg UK
PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4
Power
325 hp
242 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
281 km/h
175 mph
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK

Porsche Cayman (981C) S 3.4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
LotusEvora Sports Racer3.5 V6
9.9 L/100 km
23.8 mpg US
28.5 mpg UK
4.6 s
PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
4.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
LotusEvora Sports Racer3.5 V6
244 hp/t
182 kW/t
4.1 kg/hp
9.9 L/100 km
23.8 mpg US
28.5 mpg UK
PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4
237 hp/t
177 kW/t
4.2 kg/hp
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleLotusEvora Sports Racer3.5 V6PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4
Power
350 hp
261 kW
325 hp
242 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
370 Nm
273 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.6 s
4.9 s
Top speed
286 km/h
178 mph
281 km/h
175 mph
Lightness
1,436 kg
3,166 lb
1,370 kg
3,020 lb
Fuel consumption
9.9 L/100 km
23.8 mpg US
28.5 mpg UK
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,361 mm
171.7 in
Height
1,229 mm
48.4 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
425 L
15.0 cu ft
Length
4,380 mm
172.4 in
Height
1,295 mm
51.0 in
Range score
606 km
377 mi
780 km
485 mi
CO2 score
229 g/km
190 g/km
Trunk score
-
425 L
15.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
244 hp/t
182 kW/t
4.1 kg/hp
237 hp/t
177 kW/t
4.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleLotus Evora Sports Racer 3.5 V6Porsche Cayman (981C) S 3.4
Consumption9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km17.33 LC100 km14.35 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi27.88 LC100 mi23.09 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,485 L392 US gal327 UK gal1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,599 LC/year2,153 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Lotus Evora Sports Racer 3.5 V6

  • Has 25 hp more
  • Has 30 Nm more
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Porsche Cayman (981C) S 3.4

  • Is 66 kg lighter
  • Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 174 km (108 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 39 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Lotus Evora Sports Racer 3.5 V6
Porsche Cayman (981C) S 3.4
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.5 V6
3.5 V6
VS
LotusEvora Sports Racer3.5 V6vsLotusEvora S3.5 V6
S 3.4
R 3.4
VS
PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4vsPorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009R 3.4
3.5 V6
3.5 V6
VS
LotusEvora Sports Racer3.5 V6vsLotusEvora 4003.5 V6
S 3.4
S 3.4
VS
PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4vsPorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4
3.5 V6
3.5 V6
VS
LotusEvora Sports Racer3.5 V6vsLotusEvora3.5 V6
S 3.4
Carrera 4 3.4
VS
PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4vsPorsche911 (991)Carrera 4 3.4
3.5 V6
3.5 V6
VS
LotusEvora Sports Racer3.5 V6vsLotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6
S 3.4
2.0
VS
PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4vsPorsche718 Cayman (982)2.0
3.5 V6
3.5 V6
VS
LotusEvora Sports Racer3.5 V6vsLotusEvora GT410 Sport3.5 V6
S 3.4
Carrera 3.0
VS
PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4vsPorsche911 (991 II)Carrera 3.0
3.5 V6
3.5 V6
VS
LotusEvora Sports Racer3.5 V6vsLotusEvora GT3.5 V6
S 3.4
M235i
VS
PorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4vsBMW2 Series Coupe (F22)M235i
Lotus Evora Sports Racer 3.5 V6 vs Porsche Cayman (981C) S 3.4 - car comparison - FastVsFaster