Spyker C8 Aileron
Car comparison
Spyker C8 Aileron 4.2 V8vsLotus Evora S 3.5 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLotus Evora S
3.5 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Spyker C8 Aileron 4.2 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.5 s
- Fastest top speed300 km/h186 mph
- Most powerful400 hp298 kW
- Highest torque480 Nm354 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight256 hp/t191 kW/t3.9 kg/hp
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score79/100
- Best practicality score39/100
Lotus Evora S 3.5 V6
- Lightest1,436 kg3,166 lb
- Best economy score80/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SpykerC8 Aileron4.2 V8 | LotusEvora S3.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 400hp298kW | 350hp261kW |
| Torque | 480Nm354lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,560kg3,439lb | 1,436kg3,166lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,836kg4,048lb |
| Top speed | 300 km/h 186 mph | 286 km/h 178 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 67.4s99% target: 297 km/h / 185 mph Calculated | 67.5s99% target: 283 km/h / 176 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.5s | 4.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.7s Calculated | 14.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.3s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 14.2L/100 km16.6mpg US19.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.4s Calculated | 12.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 256hp/t191kW/t116hp/1000 lb Calculated | 244hp/t182kW/t111hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 308Nm/t206lb-ft/ton Calculated | 279Nm/t186lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 606km377mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,163cc254cu in | 3,456cc211cu in |
| Length | 4,618mm182in | 4,361mm172in |
| Width | 1,953mm77in | 2,047mm81in |
| Height | 1,270mm50in | 1,229mm48in |
| Wheelbase | 2,725mm107in | 2,575mm101in |
| Front track | 1,625mm64in | 1,564mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,646mm65in | 1,575mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 140mm6in |
| Trunk volume | - | 160L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 229g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Spyker C8 Aileron 4.2 V8: Power / Torque
- Lotus Evora S 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SpykerC8 Aileron4.2 V8 | 7,000 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| LotusEvora S3.5 V6 | 7,000 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SpykerC8 Aileron4.2 V8 | LotusEvora S3.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.3 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.5 s | 4.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.7 s | 14.7 s |
| Top speed | 300 km/h 186 mph | 286 km/h 178 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 8.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.5 s | 10.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.4 s | 12.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 191 km/h 119 mph | 186 km/h 115 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SpykerC8 Aileron4.2 V8 | 400 hp 298 kW |
| LotusEvora S3.5 V6 | 350 hp 261 kW |
Spyker C8 Aileron 4.2 V8 has 50 hp more than Lotus Evora S 3.5 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Lotus Evora S 3.5 V6 and Spyker C8 Aileron 4.2 V8: 50 hp (37 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SpykerC8 Aileron4.2 V8 | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft |
| LotusEvora S3.5 V6 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SpykerC8 Aileron4.2 V8 | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb |
| LotusEvora S3.5 V6 | 1,436 kg 3,166 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SpykerC8 Aileron4.2 V8 | 300 km/h 186 mph |
| LotusEvora S3.5 V6 | 286 km/h 178 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SpykerC8 Aileron4.2 V8 | 4.5 s |
| LotusEvora S3.5 V6 | 4.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Spyker C8 Aileron 4.2 V8 and Lotus Evora S 3.5 V6: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SpykerC8 Aileron4.2 V8 | 256 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
| LotusEvora S3.5 V6 | 244 hp/t 182 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SpykerC8 Aileron4.2 V8 | 400 hp 298 kW | 4.5 s | 300 km/h 186 mph |
| LotusEvora S3.5 V6 | 350 hp 261 kW | 4.6 s | 286 km/h 178 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SpykerC8 Aileron4.2 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LotusEvora S3.5 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SpykerC8 Aileron4.2 V8 | LotusEvora S3.5 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 400 hp 298 kW | 350 hp 261 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.5 s | 4.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 300 km/h 186 mph | 286 km/h 178 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb | 1,436 kg 3,166 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 606 km 377 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 229 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 160 L 5.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 256 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 244 hp/t 182 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lotus Evora S 3.5 V6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.88 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,485 L392 US gal327 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,599 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Spyker C8 Aileron 4.2 V8
- Has 50 hp more
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
Lotus Evora S 3.5 V6
- Is 124 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























