Car comparison

Lotus Evora S 3.5 V6vsPorsche Cayman (987C) · Facelift 2009 R 3.4

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Lotus Evora S

3.5 V6

350 hp3456 ccGasolineRWDManualSuperchargedCoupe2011-2015
VS

Porsche Cayman (987C) · Facelift 2009

R 3.4

330 hp3436 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedCoupe2011-2012

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Lotus Evora S 3.5 V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    286 km/h
    178 mph
  • Most powerful
    350 hp
    261 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lowest city consumption
    14.2 L/100 km
    16.6 mpg US
    19.9 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    606 km
    377 mi
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best performance score
    73/100

Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 R 3.4

  • Lightest
    1,295 kg
    2,855 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    255 hp/t
    190 kW/t
    3.9 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    9.7 L/100 km
    24.2 mpg US
    29.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.1 L/100 km
    33.1 mpg US
    39.8 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    260 L
  • Best economy score
    81/100
  • Best practicality score
    36/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelLotusEvora S3.5 V6PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009R 3.4
Power
350hp261kW
330hp246kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
370Nm273lb-ft
Curb weight
1,436kg3,166lb
1,295kg2,855lb
Gross weight
1,836kg4,048lb
1,620kg3,571lb
Top speed
286 km/h
178 mph
282 km/h
175 mph
To 99% top speed
67.5s99% target: 283 km/h / 176 mph
Calculated
82.5s99% target: 279 km/h / 173 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.6s
5.0s
0-200 km/h
14.7s
Calculated
17.2s
0-60 mph
4.4s
Calculated
4.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK
9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
14.2L/100 km16.6mpg US19.9mpg UK
14.2L/100 km16.6mpg US19.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.6s
Calculated
13.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
244hp/t182kW/t111hp/1000 lb
Calculated
255hp/t190kW/t116hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
279Nm/t186lb-ft/ton
Calculated
286Nm/t191lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
606km377mi
Calculated
557km346mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,456cc211cu in
3,436cc210cu in
Length
4,361mm172in
4,347mm171in
Width
2,047mm81in
1,801mm71in
Height
1,229mm48in
1,285mm51in
Wheelbase
2,575mm101in
2,415mm95in
Front track
1,564mm62in
1,490mm59in
Rear track
1,575mm62in
1,530mm60in
Ground clearance
140mm6in
103mm4in
Trunk volume
160L
260L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank
60L
54L
CO2 emissions
229g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Lotus Evora S 3.5 V6Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 R 3.4PowerTorque
  • Lotus Evora S 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
  • Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 R 3.4: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
LotusEvora S3.5 V67,000 rpm4,500 rpm7,250 rpm
PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009R 3.47,400 rpm4,750 rpm7,650 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricLotusEvora S3.5 V6PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009R 3.4
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.4 s
4.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.6 s
5.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
14.7 s
17.2 s
Top speed
286 km/h
178 mph
282 km/h
175 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.1 s
330 ft
101 m
5.5 s
5.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.3 s
8.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.7 s
11.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.6 s
13.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
186 km/h
115 mph
177 km/h
110 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LotusEvora S3.5 V6
350 hp
261 kW
PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009R 3.4
330 hp
246 kW

Lotus Evora S 3.5 V6 has 20 hp more than Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 R 3.4.

The biggest power difference is between Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 R 3.4 and Lotus Evora S 3.5 V6: 20 hp (15 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LotusEvora S3.5 V6
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009R 3.4
370 Nm
273 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LotusEvora S3.5 V6
1,436 kg
3,166 lb
PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009R 3.4
1,295 kg
2,855 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LotusEvora S3.5 V6
286 km/h
178 mph
PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009R 3.4
282 km/h
175 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LotusEvora S3.5 V64.6 s
PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009R 3.45.0 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lotus Evora S 3.5 V6 and Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 R 3.4: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LotusEvora S3.5 V6
9.9 L/100 km
23.8 mpg US
28.5 mpg UK
PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009R 3.4
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LotusEvora S3.5 V6
244 hp/t
182 kW/t
4.1 kg/hp
PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009R 3.4
255 hp/t
190 kW/t
3.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LotusEvora S3.5 V6
606 km
377 mi
PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009R 3.4
557 km
346 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
LotusEvora S3.5 V6
350 hp
261 kW
4.6 s
286 km/h
178 mph
PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009R 3.4
330 hp
246 kW
5.0 s
282 km/h
175 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
LotusEvora S3.5 V6
Power
350 hp
261 kW
0-100 km/h4.6 s
Top speed
286 km/h
178 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
160 L
5.7 cu ft
Length
4,361 mm
171.7 in
Height
1,229 mm
48.4 in
PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009R 3.4
Power
330 hp
246 kW
0-100 km/h5.0 s
Top speed
282 km/h
175 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
260 L
9.2 cu ft
Length
4,347 mm
171.1 in
Height
1,285 mm
50.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
LotusEvora S3.5 V6
Power
350 hp
261 kW
0-100 km/h4.6 s
Top speed
286 km/h
178 mph
9.9 L/100 km
23.8 mpg US
28.5 mpg UK
PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009R 3.4
Power
330 hp
246 kW
0-100 km/h5.0 s
Top speed
282 km/h
175 mph
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK

Lotus Evora S 3.5 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
LotusEvora S3.5 V6
9.9 L/100 km
23.8 mpg US
28.5 mpg UK
4.6 s
PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009R 3.4
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK
5.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
LotusEvora S3.5 V6
244 hp/t
182 kW/t
4.1 kg/hp
9.9 L/100 km
23.8 mpg US
28.5 mpg UK
PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009R 3.4
255 hp/t
190 kW/t
3.9 kg/hp
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleLotusEvora S3.5 V6PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009R 3.4
Power
350 hp
261 kW
330 hp
246 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
370 Nm
273 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.6 s
5.0 s
Top speed
286 km/h
178 mph
282 km/h
175 mph
Lightness
1,436 kg
3,166 lb
1,295 kg
2,855 lb
Fuel consumption
9.9 L/100 km
23.8 mpg US
28.5 mpg UK
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
160 L
5.7 cu ft
Length
4,361 mm
171.7 in
Height
1,229 mm
48.4 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
260 L
9.2 cu ft
Length
4,347 mm
171.1 in
Height
1,285 mm
50.6 in
Range score
606 km
377 mi
557 km
346 mi
CO2 score
229 g/km
-
Trunk score
160 L
5.7 cu ft
260 L
9.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
244 hp/t
182 kW/t
4.1 kg/hp
255 hp/t
190 kW/t
3.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleLotus Evora S 3.5 V6Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 R 3.4
Consumption9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km17.33 LC100 km16.97 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi27.88 LC100 mi27.32 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,485 L392 US gal327 UK gal1,455 L384 US gal320 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,599 LC/year2,546 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Lotus Evora S 3.5 V6

  • Has 20 hp more
  • Has 30 Nm more
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 49 km (31 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 R 3.4

  • Is 141 kg lighter
  • Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 100 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Lotus Evora S 3.5 V6
Porsche Cayman (987C) R 3.4
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.5 V6
3.5 V6
VS
LotusEvora S3.5 V6vsLotusEvora Sports Racer3.5 V6
R 3.4
S 3.4
VS
PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009R 3.4vsPorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4
3.5 V6
3.5 V6
VS
LotusEvora S3.5 V6vsLotusEvora3.5 V6
R 3.4
S 3.4
VS
PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009R 3.4vsPorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4
3.5 V6
3.5 V6
VS
LotusEvora S3.5 V6vsLotusEvora 4003.5 V6
R 3.4
Carrera 3.4
VS
PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009R 3.4vsPorsche911 (991)Carrera 3.4
3.5 V6
3.5 V6
VS
LotusEvora S3.5 V6vsLotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6
R 3.4
S 2.5
VS
PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009R 3.4vsPorsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5
3.5 V6
3.5 V6
VS
LotusEvora S3.5 V6vsLotusEvora GT410 Sport3.5 V6
R 3.4
Carrera 3.0
VS
PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009R 3.4vsPorsche911 (991 II)Carrera 3.0
3.5 V6
3.5 V6
VS
LotusEvora S3.5 V6vsLotusEvora GT3.5 V6
R 3.4
3.0
VS
PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009R 3.4vsBMW1M Coupe (E82)3.0
Lotus Evora S 3.5 V6 vs Porsche Cayman (987C) · Facelift 2009 R 3.4 - car comparison - FastVsFaster