Lotus Evora Sport 410
Car comparison
Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6vsLotus Evora GT430 3.5 V6 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLotus Evora GT430
3.5 V6 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6
- Fastest top speed300 km/h186 mph
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.6 L/100 km17.3 mpg US20.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions225 g/km
- Best estimated range619 km384 mi
- Best overall score66/100
- Best economy score81/100
- Best practicality score37/100
Lotus Evora GT430 3.5 V6 24V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.7 s
- Most powerful436 hp325 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lightest1,310 kg2,888 lb
- Best power-to-weight333 hp/t248 kW/t3.0 kg/hp
- Best performance score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 410hp306kW | 436hp325kW |
| Torque | 410Nm302lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,325kg2,921lb | 1,310kg2,888lb |
| Top speed | 300 km/h 186 mph | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 59.6s99% target: 297 km/h / 185 mph Calculated | 48.3s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.2s | 3.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.5s Calculated | 10.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.0s Calculated | 3.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK | 15.2L/100 km15.5mpg US18.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.1s Calculated | 11.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 309hp/t231kW/t140hp/1000 lb Calculated | 333hp/t248kW/t151hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 309Nm/t207lb-ft/ton Calculated | 344Nm/t230lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 619km384mi Calculated | 556km345mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,456cc211cu in | 3,456cc211cu in |
| Length | - | 4,396mm173in |
| Width | - | 1,845mm73in |
| Height | - | 1,229mm48in |
| Wheelbase | - | 2,575mm101in |
| Ground clearance | - | 120mm5in |
| Trunk volume | - | 160L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 225g/km | 247g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
- Lotus Evora GT430 3.5 V6 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 7,000 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | 7,000 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.0 s | 3.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.2 s | 3.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.5 s | 10.8 s |
| Top speed | 300 km/h 186 mph | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 7.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.2 s | 9.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.1 s | 11.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 197 km/h 122 mph | 206 km/h 128 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 410 hp 306 kW |
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | 436 hp 325 kW |
Lotus Evora GT430 3.5 V6 24V has 26 hp more than Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6 and Lotus Evora GT430 3.5 V6 24V: 26 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft |
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 1,325 kg 2,921 lb |
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | 1,310 kg 2,888 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 300 km/h 186 mph |
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 4.2 s |
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | 3.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lotus Evora GT430 3.5 V6 24V and Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6 and Lotus Evora GT430 3.5 V6 24V: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 309 hp/t 231 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp |
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | 333 hp/t 248 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 619 km 384 mi |
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | 556 km 345 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 410 hp 306 kW | 4.2 s | 300 km/h 186 mph |
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | 436 hp 325 kW | 3.7 s | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 |
| 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V |
| 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | 3.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 309 hp/t 231 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | 333 hp/t 248 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 410 hp 306 kW | 436 hp 325 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.2 s | 3.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 300 km/h 186 mph | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,325 kg 2,921 lb | 1,310 kg 2,888 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 619 km 384 mi | 556 km 345 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 225 g/km | 247 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 160 L 5.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 309 hp/t 231 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 333 hp/t 248 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6 | Lotus Evora GT430 3.5 V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK | 10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.97 LC100 km | 18.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.32 LC100 mi | 30.42 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,455 L384 US gal320 UK gal | 1,620 L428 US gal356 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,546 LC/year | 2,835 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 63 km (39 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 22 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Lotus Evora GT430 3.5 V6 24V
- Has 26 hp more
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 15 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 23 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























