Lotus Evora GT430
Car comparison
Lotus Evora GT430 3.5 V6 24VvsLotus Evora S 3.5 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLotus Evora S
3.5 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lotus Evora GT430 3.5 V6 24V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.7 s
- Fastest top speed295 km/h183 mph Unrestricted280 km/h174 mph Restricted
- Most powerful436 hp325 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lightest1,310 kg2,888 lb
- Best power-to-weight333 hp/t248 kW/t3.0 kg/hp
- Largest trunk160 L
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score82/100
- Best practicality score32/100
Lotus Evora S 3.5 V6
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption14.2 L/100 km16.6 mpg US19.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions229 g/km
- Best estimated range606 km377 mi
- Best economy score80/100
Specification comparison
| Model | LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | LotusEvora S3.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 436hp325kW | 350hp261kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,310kg2,888lb | 1,436kg3,166lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,836kg4,048lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated | 286 km/h 178 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 48.0s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph Calculated | 67.5s99% target: 283 km/h / 176 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.7s | 4.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.8s Calculated | 14.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.5s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.2L/100 km15.5mpg US18.6mpg UK | 14.2L/100 km16.6mpg US19.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.5s Calculated | 12.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 333hp/t248kW/t151hp/1000 lb Calculated | 244hp/t182kW/t111hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 344Nm/t230lb-ft/ton Calculated | 279Nm/t186lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 556km345mi Calculated | 606km377mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,456cc211cu in | 3,456cc211cu in |
| Length | 4,396mm173in | 4,361mm172in |
| Width | 1,845mm73in | 2,047mm81in |
| Height | 1,229mm48in | 1,229mm48in |
| Wheelbase | 2,575mm101in | 2,575mm101in |
| Front track | - | 1,564mm62in |
| Rear track | - | 1,575mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 120mm5in | 140mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 160L | 160L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 247g/km | 229g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lotus Evora GT430 3.5 V6 24V: Power / Torque
- Lotus Evora S 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | 7,000 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| LotusEvora S3.5 V6 | 7,000 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | LotusEvora S3.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.5 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.7 s | 4.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.8 s | 14.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited | 286 km/h 178 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.6 s | 8.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.7 s | 10.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.5 s | 12.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 206 km/h 128 mph | 186 km/h 115 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | 436 hp 325 kW |
| LotusEvora S3.5 V6 | 350 hp 261 kW |
Lotus Evora GT430 3.5 V6 24V has 86 hp more than Lotus Evora S 3.5 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Lotus Evora S 3.5 V6 and Lotus Evora GT430 3.5 V6 24V: 86 hp (64 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| LotusEvora S3.5 V6 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | 1,310 kg 2,888 lb |
| LotusEvora S3.5 V6 | 1,436 kg 3,166 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| LotusEvora S3.5 V6 | 286 km/h 178 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | 3.7 s |
| LotusEvora S3.5 V6 | 4.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lotus Evora GT430 3.5 V6 24V and Lotus Evora S 3.5 V6: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK |
| LotusEvora S3.5 V6 | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lotus Evora S 3.5 V6 and Lotus Evora GT430 3.5 V6 24V: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | 333 hp/t 248 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp |
| LotusEvora S3.5 V6 | 244 hp/t 182 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | 556 km 345 mi |
| LotusEvora S3.5 V6 | 606 km 377 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | 436 hp 325 kW | 3.7 s | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| LotusEvora S3.5 V6 | 350 hp 261 kW | 4.6 s | 286 km/h 178 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LotusEvora S3.5 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V |
| 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| LotusEvora S3.5 V6 |
| 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Lotus Evora GT430 3.5 V6 24V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | 3.7 s |
| LotusEvora S3.5 V6 | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | 333 hp/t 248 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK |
| LotusEvora S3.5 V6 | 244 hp/t 182 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | LotusEvora S3.5 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 436 hp 325 kW | 350 hp 261 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.7 s | 4.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | 286 km/h 178 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,310 kg 2,888 lb | 1,436 kg 3,166 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 556 km 345 mi | 606 km 377 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 247 g/km | 229 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 160 L 5.7 cu ft | 160 L 5.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 333 hp/t 248 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 244 hp/t 182 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lotus Evora GT430 3.5 V6 24V | Lotus Evora S 3.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK | 9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.90 LC100 km | 17.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.42 LC100 mi | 27.88 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,620 L428 US gal356 UK gal | 1,485 L392 US gal327 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,835 LC/year | 2,599 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lotus Evora GT430 3.5 V6 24V
- Has 86 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 126 kg lighter
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 89 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Lotus Evora S 3.5 V6
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 51 km (31 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 18 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























