Porsche Cayman (981C)
Car comparison
Porsche Cayman (981C) GT4 3.8vsLotus Evora 400 3.5 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLotus Evora 400
3.5 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.2 s
- Most powerful406 hp303 kW
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption14.1 L/100 km16.7 mpg US20.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions225 g/km
- Best estimated range619 km384 mi
- Best overall score68/100
- Best economy score81/100
- Best practicality score50/100
Porsche Cayman (981C) GT4 3.8
- Fastest top speed295 km/h183 mph
- Highest torque420 Nm310 lb-ft
- Lightest1,340 kg2,954 lb
- Best power-to-weight287 hp/t214 kW/t3.5 kg/hp
- Best performance score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheCayman (981C)GT4 3.8 | LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 385hp287kW | 406hp303kW |
| Torque | 420Nm310lb-ft | 410Nm302lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,340kg2,954lb | 1,422kg3,135lb |
| Gross weight | 1,640kg3,616lb | - |
| Top speed | 295 km/h 183 mph | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 59.7s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph Calculated | 58.0s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.4s | 4.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.1s Calculated | 12.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.2s Calculated | 4.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK | 14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.3s Calculated | 12.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 287hp/t214kW/t130hp/1000 lb Calculated | 286hp/t213kW/t130hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 313Nm/t210lb-ft/ton Calculated | 288Nm/t193lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 524km326mi Calculated | 619km384mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,800cc232cu in | 3,456cc211cu in |
| Length | 4,438mm175in | 4,394mm173in |
| Width | 1,817mm72in | 1,845mm73in |
| Height | 1,266mm50in | 1,229mm48in |
| Wheelbase | 2,484mm98in | 2,575mm101in |
| Front track | - | 1,564mm62in |
| Rear track | - | 1,575mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 425L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 54L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 238g/km | 225g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Cayman (981C) GT4 3.8: Power / Torque
- Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)GT4 3.8 | 7,400 rpm | 4,750-6,000 rpm | 7,650 rpm |
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 7,000 rpm | 3,500-6,500 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheCayman (981C)GT4 3.8 | LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.2 s | 4.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.4 s | 4.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.1 s | 12.9 s |
| Top speed | 295 km/h 183 mph | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.1 s | 8.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.4 s | 10.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.3 s | 12.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 194 km/h 120 mph | 194 km/h 121 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)GT4 3.8 | 385 hp 287 kW |
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 406 hp 303 kW |
Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6 has 21 hp more than Porsche Cayman (981C) GT4 3.8.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche Cayman (981C) GT4 3.8 and Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6: 21 hp (16 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)GT4 3.8 | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)GT4 3.8 | 1,340 kg 2,954 lb |
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 1,422 kg 3,135 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)GT4 3.8 | 295 km/h 183 mph |
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)GT4 3.8 | 4.4 s |
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 4.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6 and Porsche Cayman (981C) GT4 3.8: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)GT4 3.8 | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK |
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6 and Porsche Cayman (981C) GT4 3.8: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)GT4 3.8 | 287 hp/t 214 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)GT4 3.8 | 524 km 326 mi |
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 619 km 384 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)GT4 3.8 | 385 hp 287 kW | 4.4 s | 295 km/h 183 mph |
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 406 hp 303 kW | 4.2 s | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)GT4 3.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)GT4 3.8 |
| 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 |
| 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)GT4 3.8 | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK | 4.4 s |
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)GT4 3.8 | 287 hp/t 214 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK |
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheCayman (981C)GT4 3.8 | LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 385 hp 287 kW | 406 hp 303 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.4 s | 4.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 295 km/h 183 mph | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,340 kg 2,954 lb | 1,422 kg 3,135 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 524 km 326 mi | 619 km 384 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 238 g/km | 225 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 287 hp/t 214 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Cayman (981C) GT4 3.8 | Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.3 L/100 km22.8 mpg US27.4 mpg UK | 9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.03 LC100 km | 16.97 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.01 LC100 mi | 27.32 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,545 L408 US gal340 UK gal | 1,455 L384 US gal320 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,704 LC/year | 2,546 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Cayman (981C) GT4 3.8
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 82 kg lighter
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6
- Has 21 hp more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 94 km (59 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 13 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























