Porsche 911 (991 II)
Car comparison
Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera 4S 3.0vsLotus Evora 400 3.5 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLotus Evora 400
3.5 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera 4S 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.2 s
- Fastest top speed305 km/h190 mph
- Most powerful420 hp313 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.4 L/100 km19.0 mpg US22.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions204 g/km
- Best estimated range764 km475 mi
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score82/100
- Best economy score83/100
Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6
- Lightest1,422 kg3,135 lb
- Best power-to-weight286 hp/t213 kW/t3.5 kg/hp
- Best practicality score50/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 4S 3.0 | LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 420hp313kW | 406hp303kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 410Nm302lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,490kg3,285lb | 1,422kg3,135lb |
| Gross weight | 1,950kg4,299lb | - |
| Top speed | 305 km/h 190 mph | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 60.8s99% target: 302 km/h / 188 mph Calculated | 58.4s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.2s | 4.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.3s Calculated | 12.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.0s Calculated | 4.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK | 14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.0s Calculated | 12.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 282hp/t210kW/t128hp/1000 lb Calculated | 286hp/t213kW/t130hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 336Nm/t225lb-ft/ton Calculated | 288Nm/t193lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 764km475mi Calculated | 619km384mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,981cc182cu in | 3,456cc211cu in |
| Length | 4,499mm177in | 4,394mm173in |
| Width | 1,852mm73in | 1,845mm73in |
| Height | 1,298mm51in | 1,229mm48in |
| Wheelbase | 2,450mm96in | 2,575mm101in |
| Front track | 1,543mm61in | 1,564mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,558mm61in | 1,575mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 125L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 260L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 204g/km | 225g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera 4S 3.0: Power / Torque
- Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 4S 3.0 | 6,500 rpm | 1,700-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 7,000 rpm | 3,500-6,500 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 4S 3.0 | LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.0 s | 4.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.2 s | 4.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.3 s | 12.9 s |
| Top speed | 305 km/h 190 mph | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 8.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.2 s | 10.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.0 s | 12.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 198 km/h 123 mph | 194 km/h 121 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 4S 3.0 | 420 hp 313 kW |
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 406 hp 303 kW |
Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera 4S 3.0 has 14 hp more than Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6 and Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera 4S 3.0: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 4S 3.0 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 4S 3.0 | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb |
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 1,422 kg 3,135 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 4S 3.0 | 305 km/h 190 mph |
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 4S 3.0 | 4.2 s |
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 4.2 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 4S 3.0 | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera 4S 3.0 and Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 4S 3.0 | 282 hp/t 210 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 4S 3.0 | 764 km 475 mi |
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 619 km 384 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 4S 3.0 | 420 hp 313 kW | 4.2 s | 305 km/h 190 mph |
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 406 hp 303 kW | 4.2 s | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 4S 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 4S 3.0 |
| 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 |
| 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera 4S 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 4S 3.0 | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 4S 3.0 | 282 hp/t 210 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 4S 3.0 | LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 420 hp 313 kW | 406 hp 303 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.2 s | 4.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 305 km/h 190 mph | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb | 1,422 kg 3,135 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 764 km 475 mi | 619 km 384 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 204 g/km | 225 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 125 L 4.4 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 282 hp/t 210 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera 4S 3.0 | Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK | 9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.58 LC100 km | 16.97 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.07 LC100 mi | 27.32 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal | 1,455 L384 US gal320 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,336 LC/year | 2,546 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera 4S 3.0
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 90 Nm more
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 145 km (90 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 21 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6
- Is 68 kg lighter
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























