Lotus Elise (SERIES 3)
Car comparison
Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) Cup 250 1.8vsLotus Elise (SERIES 3) · Facelift 2017 Cup 260 1.8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLotus Elise (SERIES 3) · Facelift 2017
Cup 260 1.8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) Facelift 2017 Cup 260 1.8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.2 s
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Highest torque265 Nm195 lb-ft
- Lightest895 kg1,973 lb
- Best power-to-weight279 hp/t208 kW/t3.6 kg/hp
- Best overall score53/100
- Best practicality score29/100
Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) Cup 250 1.8
- Fastest top speed248 km/h154 mph
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions175 g/km
- Best performance score65/100
- Best economy score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | LotusElise (SERIES 3)Cup 250 1.8 | LotusElise (SERIES 3)Facelift 2017Cup 260 1.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 246hp183kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 265Nm195lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 931kg2,053lb | 895kg1,973lb |
| Top speed | 248 km/h 154 mph | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 43.4s99% target: 246 km/h / 153 mph Calculated | 43.4s99% target: 241 km/h / 149 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.3s | 4.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.6s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.1s Calculated | 4.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.3s Calculated | 12.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 264hp/t197kW/t120hp/1000 lb Calculated | 279hp/t208kW/t127hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 269Nm/t180lb-ft/ton Calculated | 296Nm/t198lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 533km331mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,798cc110cu in | 1,798cc110cu in |
| Length | 3,824mm151in | - |
| Width | 1,719mm68in | - |
| Height | 1,117mm44in | - |
| Wheelbase | 2,300mm91in | - |
| Front track | 1,457mm57in | - |
| Rear track | 1,507mm59in | - |
| Ground clearance | 130mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 112L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 40L | - |
| CO2 emissions | 175g/km | 175g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) Cup 250 1.8: Power / Torque
- Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) Facelift 2017 Cup 260 1.8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Cup 250 1.8 | 7,200 rpm | 3,500-5,000 rpm | 7,450 rpm |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Facelift 2017Cup 260 1.8 | 7,200 rpm | 5,500 rpm | 7,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LotusElise (SERIES 3)Cup 250 1.8 | LotusElise (SERIES 3)Facelift 2017Cup 260 1.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.1 s | 4.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.3 s | 4.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.6 s | 15.1 s |
| Top speed | 248 km/h 154 mph | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.1 s | 8.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.4 s | 10.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.3 s | 12.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 187 km/h 116 mph | 185 km/h 115 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Cup 250 1.8 | 246 hp 183 kW |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Facelift 2017Cup 260 1.8 | 250 hp 186 kW |
Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) Facelift 2017 Cup 260 1.8 has 4 hp more than Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) Cup 250 1.8.
The biggest power difference is between Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) Cup 250 1.8 and Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) Facelift 2017 Cup 260 1.8: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Cup 250 1.8 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Facelift 2017Cup 260 1.8 | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Cup 250 1.8 | 931 kg 2,053 lb |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Facelift 2017Cup 260 1.8 | 895 kg 1,973 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Cup 250 1.8 | 248 km/h 154 mph |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Facelift 2017Cup 260 1.8 | 243 km/h 151 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Cup 250 1.8 | 4.3 s |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Facelift 2017Cup 260 1.8 | 4.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) Facelift 2017 Cup 260 1.8 and Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) Cup 250 1.8: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Cup 250 1.8 | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Facelift 2017Cup 260 1.8 | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Cup 250 1.8 | 264 hp/t 197 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Facelift 2017Cup 260 1.8 | 279 hp/t 208 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Cup 250 1.8 | 246 hp 183 kW | 4.3 s | 248 km/h 154 mph |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Facelift 2017Cup 260 1.8 | 250 hp 186 kW | 4.2 s | 243 km/h 151 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Cup 250 1.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Facelift 2017Cup 260 1.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Cup 250 1.8 |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Facelift 2017Cup 260 1.8 |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) Cup 250 1.8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Cup 250 1.8 | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 4.3 s |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Facelift 2017Cup 260 1.8 | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Cup 250 1.8 | 264 hp/t 197 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Facelift 2017Cup 260 1.8 | 279 hp/t 208 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LotusElise (SERIES 3)Cup 250 1.8 | LotusElise (SERIES 3)Facelift 2017Cup 260 1.8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 246 hp 183 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.3 s | 4.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 248 km/h 154 mph | 243 km/h 151 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 931 kg 2,053 lb | 895 kg 1,973 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 533 km 331 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 175 g/km | 175 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 112 L 4.0 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 264 hp/t 197 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 279 hp/t 208 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) Cup 250 1.8 | Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) Facelift 2017 Cup 260 1.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.13 LC100 km | 13.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,969 LC/year | 1,969 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) Cup 250 1.8
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) Facelift 2017 Cup 260 1.8
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 15 Nm more
- Is 36 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























