Car comparison

Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350hvsMazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Lexus NX II (AZ20)

350h

190 hp2487 ccGasolineFWDCVTNaturally aspiratedSUV2021-present
VS

Mazda CX-30

2.0 Skyactiv-X

180 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSUV2019-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    210 km/h
    130 mph Unrestricted
    200 km/h
    124 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Highest torque
    239 Nm
    176 lb-ft
  • Largest trunk
    545 L
  • Best overall score
    56/100
  • Best performance score
    42/100
  • Best practicality score
    86/100

Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X

  • Lightest
    1,491 kg
    3,287 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    121 hp/t
    90 kW/t
    8.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.2 L/100 km
    45.2 mpg US
    54.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    981 km
    609 mi
  • Best economy score
    93/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelLexusNX II (AZ20)350hMazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
Power
190hp142kW
180hp134kW
Torque
239Nm176lb-ft
224Nm165lb-ft
Curb weight
1,810kg3,990lb
1,491kg3,287lb
Gross weight
2,320kg5,115lb
1,965kg4,332lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
204 km/h
127 mph
To 99% top speed
95.0s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
79.2s99% target: 202 km/h / 125 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.7s
8.8s
0-200 km/h
57.4s
Calculated
66.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.2s
Calculated
8.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.3s
Calculated
16.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
105hp/t78kW/t48hp/1000 lb
Calculated
121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
132Nm/t88lb-ft/ton
Calculated
150Nm/t101lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
932km579mi
Calculated
981km609mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,487cc152cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,660mm183in
4,395mm173in
Width
1,865mm73in
1,795mm71in
Height
1,670mm66in
1,540mm61in
Wheelbase
2,690mm106in
2,655mm105in
Front track
1,605mm63in
1,565mm62in
Rear track
1,625mm64in
1,565mm62in
Ground clearance
195mm8in
175mm7in
Trunk volume
545L
430L
Max trunk volume
1,436L
1,406L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
55L
51L
CO2 emissions-
118g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350hMazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-XPowerTorque
  • Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h: Power / Torque
  • Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h6,000 rpm4,300-4,500 rpm6,250 rpm
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X6,000 rpm3,000 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricLexusNX II (AZ20)350hMazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.2 s
8.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.7 s
8.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
57.4 s
66.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Limited
204 km/h
127 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
7.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.6 s
10.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.7 s
13.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.3 s
16.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
139 km/h
86 mph
140 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h
190 hp
142 kW
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
180 hp
134 kW

Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h has 10 hp more than Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X.

The biggest power difference is between Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X and Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h
239 Nm
176 lb-ft
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
224 Nm
165 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h
1,810 kg
3,990 lb
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
1,491 kg
3,287 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
204 km/h
127 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h8.7 s
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X8.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h and Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X and Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h: 0.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h
932 km
579 mi
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
981 km
609 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h
190 hp
142 kW
8.7 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
180 hp
134 kW
8.8 s
204 km/h
127 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
545 L
19.2 cu ft
Length
4,660 mm
183.5 in
Height
1,670 mm
65.7 in
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK

Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
8.7 s
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
8.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleLexusNX II (AZ20)350hMazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
Power
190 hp
142 kW
180 hp
134 kW
Torque
239 Nm
176 lb-ft
224 Nm
165 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.7 s
8.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
204 km/h
127 mph
Lightness
1,810 kg
3,990 lb
1,491 kg
3,287 lb
Fuel consumption
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
545 L
19.2 cu ft
Length
4,660 mm
183.5 in
Height
1,670 mm
65.7 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in
Range score
932 km
579 mi
981 km
609 mi
CO2 score
-
118 g/km
Trunk score
545 L
19.2 cu ft
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleLexus NX II (AZ20) 350hMazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X
Consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.33 LC100 km9.10 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.62 LC100 mi14.65 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used885 L234 US gal195 UK gal780 L206 US gal172 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,549 LC/year1,365 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 15 Nm more
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 115 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X

  • Is 319 kg lighter
  • Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 49 km (30 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h
Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

350h
300
VS
LexusNX II (AZ20)350hvsLexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
2.0 Skyactiv-X
2.2d
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-XvsMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
350h
200t
VS
LexusNX II (AZ20)350hvsLexusNX I (AZ10)200t
2.0 Skyactiv-X
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-XvsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
350h
200
VS
LexusNX II (AZ20)350hvsLexusUX200
2.0 Skyactiv-X
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-XvsMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
350h
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
VS
LexusNX II (AZ20)350hvsMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
2.0 Skyactiv-X
2.0i
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-XvsMazdaCX-32.0i
350h
2.0i
VS
LexusNX II (AZ20)350hvsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
2.0 Skyactiv-X
330TSI
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-XvsVolkswagenTayron I330TSI
350h
2.2 CRDi
VS
LexusNX II (AZ20)350hvsHyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi
2.0 Skyactiv-X
20d
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-XvsJaguarF-Pace20d
Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h vs Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X - car comparison - FastVsFaster