Lexus LC
Car comparison
Lexus LC 500 V8vsMercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) AMG C 63 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205)
AMG C 63 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) AMG C 63 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.0 s
- Highest torque650 Nm479 lb-ft
- Lightest1,710 kg3,770 lb
- Best power-to-weight278 hp/t208 kW/t3.6 kg/hp
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score84/100
- Best economy score83/100
- Best practicality score52/100
Lexus LC 500 V8
- Fastest top speed285 km/h177 mph Unrestricted270 km/h168 mph Restricted
- Most powerful477 hp356 kW
Specification comparison
| Model | LexusLC500 V8 | Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)AMG C 63 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 477hp356kW | 476hp355kW |
| Torque | 540Nm398lb-ft | 650Nm479lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,935kg4,266lb | 1,710kg3,770lb |
| Gross weight | 2,385kg5,258lb | 2,155kg4,751lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 73.3s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated | 50.0s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.7s | 4.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.5s Calculated | 13.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.5s Calculated | 3.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.8s Calculated | 12.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 247hp/t184kW/t112hp/1000 lb Calculated | 278hp/t208kW/t126hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 279Nm/t187lb-ft/ton Calculated | 380Nm/t254lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 742km461mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,969cc303cu in | 3,982cc243cu in |
| Length | 4,760mm187in | 4,750mm187in |
| Width | 1,920mm76in | 1,877mm74in |
| Height | 1,345mm53in | 1,400mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,870mm113in | 2,840mm112in |
| Front track | 1,630mm64in | 1,636mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,635mm64in | 1,592mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 133mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 150L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 82L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 209g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lexus LC 500 V8: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) AMG C 63 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LexusLC500 V8 | 7,100 rpm | 4,800 rpm | 7,350 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)AMG C 63 V8 | 5,500-6,250 rpm | 1,750-4,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LexusLC500 V8 | Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)AMG C 63 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.5 s | 3.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.7 s | 4.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.5 s | 13.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 7.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.8 s | 10.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.8 s | 12.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 182 km/h 113 mph | 191 km/h 119 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLC500 V8 | 477 hp 356 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)AMG C 63 V8 | 476 hp 355 kW |
Lexus LC 500 V8 has 1 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) AMG C 63 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) AMG C 63 V8 and Lexus LC 500 V8: 1 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLC500 V8 | 540 Nm 398 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)AMG C 63 V8 | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLC500 V8 | 1,935 kg 4,266 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)AMG C 63 V8 | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLC500 V8 | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)AMG C 63 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLC500 V8 | 4.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)AMG C 63 V8 | 4.0 s |
Although Lexus LC 500 V8 has more power, Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) AMG C 63 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) AMG C 63 V8 and Lexus LC 500 V8: 0.7 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLC500 V8 | 247 hp/t 184 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)AMG C 63 V8 | 278 hp/t 208 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LexusLC500 V8 | 477 hp 356 kW | 4.7 s | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)AMG C 63 V8 | 476 hp 355 kW | 4.0 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LexusLC500 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)AMG C 63 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LexusLC500 V8 | Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)AMG C 63 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 477 hp 356 kW | 476 hp 355 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 540 Nm 398 lb-ft | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.7 s | 4.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,935 kg 4,266 lb | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 742 km 461 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 209 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 150 L 5.3 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 247 hp/t 184 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 278 hp/t 208 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) AMG C 63 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.07 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,336 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lexus LC 500 V8
- Has 1 hp more
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) AMG C 63 V8
- Has 110 Nm more
- Is 225 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 32 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























