Lexus GS IV
Car comparison
Lexus GS IV 450hvsVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 3.0 T6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013
3.0 T6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lexus GS IV 450h
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,065 km661 mi
- Largest trunk405 L
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score72/100
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 3.0 T6
- Most powerful304 hp227 kW
- Highest torque440 Nm325 lb-ft
- Lightest1,677 kg3,697 lb
- Best power-to-weight181 hp/t135 kW/t5.5 kg/hp
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score65/100
Specification comparison
| Model | LexusGS IV450h | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20133.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 292hp218kW | 304hp227kW |
| Torque | 352Nm260lb-ft | 440Nm325lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,860kg4,101lb | 1,677kg3,697lb |
| Gross weight | 2,335kg5,148lb | 2,220kg4,894lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 61.3s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 59.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.1s Calculated | 18.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 14.5L/100 km16.2mpg US19.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 13.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 157hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated | 181hp/t135kW/t82hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 189Nm/t127lb-ft/ton Calculated | 262Nm/t176lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,065km661mi Calculated | 682km424mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,456cc211cu in | 2,953cc180cu in |
| Length | 4,850mm191in | 4,635mm182in |
| Width | 1,840mm72in | 1,865mm73in |
| Height | 1,455mm57in | 1,484mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,850mm112in | 2,776mm109in |
| Front track | 1,575mm62in | 1,578mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,590mm63in | 1,575mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 124mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 405L | 380L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 68L |
| CO2 emissions | 145g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lexus GS IV 450h: Power / Torque
- Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 3.0 T6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LexusGS IV450h | 6,000 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20133.0 T6 | 5,600 rpm | 2,100-4,200 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LexusGS IV450h | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20133.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.1 s | 18.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 13.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 175 km/h 109 mph | 175 km/h 109 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusGS IV450h | 292 hp 218 kW |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20133.0 T6 | 304 hp 227 kW |
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 3.0 T6 has 12 hp more than Lexus GS IV 450h.
The biggest power difference is between Lexus GS IV 450h and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 3.0 T6: 12 hp (9 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusGS IV450h | 352 Nm 260 lb-ft |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20133.0 T6 | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusGS IV450h | 1,860 kg 4,101 lb |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20133.0 T6 | 1,677 kg 3,697 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusGS IV450h | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20133.0 T6 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusGS IV450h | 5.9 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20133.0 T6 | 5.9 s |
Although Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 3.0 T6 has more power, Lexus GS IV 450h is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusGS IV450h | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20133.0 T6 | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lexus GS IV 450h and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 3.0 T6: 3.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusGS IV450h | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20133.0 T6 | 181 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusGS IV450h | 1,065 km 661 mi |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20133.0 T6 | 682 km 424 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LexusGS IV450h | 292 hp 218 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20133.0 T6 | 304 hp 227 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LexusGS IV450h |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20133.0 T6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LexusGS IV450h |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20133.0 T6 |
| 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Lexus GS IV 450h is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LexusGS IV450h | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20133.0 T6 | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LexusGS IV450h | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20133.0 T6 | 181 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LexusGS IV450h | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20133.0 T6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 292 hp 218 kW | 304 hp 227 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 352 Nm 260 lb-ft | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,860 kg 4,101 lb | 1,677 kg 3,697 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,065 km 661 mi | 682 km 424 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 145 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 405 L 14.3 cu ft | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 181 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lexus GS IV 450h | Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 3.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK | 9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.85 LC100 km | 17.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi | 27.88 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal | 1,485 L392 US gal327 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,628 LC/year | 2,599 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lexus GS IV 450h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 3.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 383 km (238 mi) more estimated range
- Has 25 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 3.0 T6
- Has 12 hp more
- Has 88 Nm more
- Is 183 kg lighter
- Has 24 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























