Car comparison

Porsche Macan I (95B) · Facelift 2018 2.0vsLand Rover Range Rover Velar D 240 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Porsche Macan I (95B) · Facelift 2018

2.0

245 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2018-2021
VS

Land Rover Range Rover Velar

D 240 2.0

240 hp1999 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 240 2.0

  • Highest torque
    500 Nm
    369 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.8 L/100 km
    40.6 mpg US
    48.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.2 L/100 km
    32.7 mpg US
    39.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.1 L/100 km
    46.1 mpg US
    55.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    154 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,034 km
    643 mi
  • Largest trunk
    673 L
  • Best overall score
    66/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100
  • Best practicality score
    91/100

Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    225 km/h
    140 mph
  • Most powerful
    245 hp
    183 kW
  • Lightest
    1,795 kg
    3,957 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    136 hp/t
    102 kW/t
    7.3 kg/hp
  • Best performance score
    54/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0
Power
245hp183kW
240hp179kW
Torque
370Nm273lb-ft
500Nm369lb-ft
Curb weight
1,795kg3,957lb
1,841kg4,059lb
Gross weight
2,510kg5,534lb
-
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
78.3s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
84.1s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.7s
7.3s
0-200 km/h
32.4s
Calculated
40.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.3s
Calculated
6.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.8s
Calculated
15.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
136hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
206Nm/t138lb-ft/ton
Calculated
272Nm/t182lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
802km499mi
Calculated
1,034km643mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,999cc122cu in
Length
4,696mm185in
4,803mm189in
Width
1,923mm76in
-
Height
1,624mm64in
1,665mm66in
Wheelbase
2,807mm111in
2,874mm113in
Front track
1,655mm65in
1,644mm65in
Rear track
1,651mm65in
1,663mm65in
Ground clearance
205mm8in
251mm10in
Trunk volume
500L
673L
Max trunk volume
1,500L
1,731L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
65L
60L
CO2 emissions
185g/km
154g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 240 2.0PowerTorque
  • Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 240 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.05,000-6,750 rpm1,600-4,500 rpm7,000 rpm
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.04,000 rpm1,500 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.3 s
6.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.7 s
7.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
32.4 s
40.9 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.3 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.6 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.4 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.8 s
15.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
153 km/h
95 mph
147 km/h
91 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
245 hp
183 kW
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0
240 hp
179 kW

Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0 has 5 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 240 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 240 2.0 and Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
370 Nm
273 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0
500 Nm
369 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
1,795 kg
3,957 lb
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0
1,841 kg
4,059 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
225 km/h
140 mph
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0
217 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0 and Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 240 2.0: 0.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 240 2.0 and Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0: 2.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
802 km
499 mi
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0
1,034 km
643 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
245 hp
183 kW
6.7 s
225 km/h
140 mph
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0
240 hp
179 kW
7.3 s
217 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,696 mm
184.9 in
Height
1,624 mm
63.9 in
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
673 L
23.8 cu ft
Length
4,803 mm
189.1 in
Height
1,665 mm
65.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK

Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 240 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
6.7 s
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
7.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehiclePorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 240 2.0
Power
245 hp
183 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
370 Nm
273 lb-ft
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.7 s
7.3 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
1,795 kg
3,957 lb
1,841 kg
4,059 lb
Fuel consumption
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,696 mm
184.9 in
Height
1,624 mm
63.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
673 L
23.8 cu ft
Length
4,803 mm
189.1 in
Height
1,665 mm
65.6 in
Range score
802 km
499 mi
1,034 km
643 mi
CO2 score
185 g/km
154 g/km
Trunk score
500 L
17.7 cu ft
673 L
23.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehiclePorsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 240 2.0
Consumption8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.17 LC100 km10.15 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.81 LC100 mi16.33 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal870 L230 US gal191 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,126 LC/year1,523 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Is 46 kg lighter
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 240 2.0

  • Has 130 Nm more
  • Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 232 km (144 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 173 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 31 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0
Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 240 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Porsche Macan I (95B) · Facelift 2018 2.0 vs Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 240 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster