Land Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2023
Car comparison
Land Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2023 3.0 P400vsMercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 500 100 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294)
EQE 500 100 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 3.0 P400
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest2,010 kg4,431 lb
- Best power-to-weight199 hp/t148 kW/t5.0 kg/hp
- Largest trunk735 L
- Best overall score78/100
- Best economy score79/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 500 100 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Most powerful408 hp304 kW
- Highest torque858 Nm633 lb-ft
- Best performance score73/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 P400 | Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 500 100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 400hp298kW | 408hp304kW |
| Torque | 550Nm406lb-ft | 858Nm633lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,010kg4,431lb | 2,485kg5,478lb |
| Gross weight | - | 3,095kg6,823lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 71.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 47.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.5s | 4.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.3s Calculated | 23.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.2s Calculated | 4.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.6s Calculated | 13.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 199hp/t148kW/t90hp/1000 lb Calculated | 164hp/t122kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 274Nm/t183lb-ft/ton Calculated | 345Nm/t231lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 814km506mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,995cc183cu in | - |
| Length | 4,797mm189in | 4,863mm191in |
| Width | - | 1,940mm76in |
| Height | 1,683mm66in | 1,686mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,874mm113in | 3,030mm119in |
| Front track | 1,644mm65in | 1,650mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,663mm65in | 1,663mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 214mm8in | 181mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 735L | 520L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,798L | 1,675L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 83L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 P400 | Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 500 100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.2 s | 4.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.5 s | 4.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.3 s | 23.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.9 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.5 s | 11.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.6 s | 13.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 171 km/h 107 mph | 169 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 P400 | 400 hp 298 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 500 100 kWh | 408 hp 304 kW |
Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 500 100 kWh has 8 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 3.0 P400.
The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 3.0 P400 and Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 500 100 kWh: 8 hp (6 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 P400 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 500 100 kWh | 858 Nm 633 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 P400 | 2,010 kg 4,431 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 500 100 kWh | 2,485 kg 5,478 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 P400 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 500 100 kWh | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 P400 | 5.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 500 100 kWh | 4.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 500 100 kWh and Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 3.0 P400: 0.6 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 P400 | 199 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 500 100 kWh | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 P400 | 400 hp 298 kW | 5.5 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 500 100 kWh | 408 hp 304 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 P400 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 500 100 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20233.0 P400 | Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 500 100 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 400 hp 298 kW | 408 hp 304 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | 858 Nm 633 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.5 s | 4.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,010 kg 4,431 lb | 2,485 kg 5,478 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 814 km 506 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 735 L 26.0 cu ft | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 199 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 3.0 P400 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.73 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,678 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 3.0 P400
- Is 475 kg lighter
- Has 40 km/h (25 mph) higher top speed
- Has 35 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 215 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 500 100 kWh
- Has 8 hp more
- Has 308 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























