Land Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Land Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2020 3.0 P340vsPorsche Cayenne III · Facelift 2023 3.0 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche Cayenne III · Facelift 2023
3.0 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 3.0 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.0 s
- Most powerful353 hp263 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight172 hp/t128 kW/t5.8 kg/hp
- Largest trunk772 L
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score65/100
- Best economy score74/100
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 3.0 P340
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Lightest2,010 kg4,431 lb
- Best practicality score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 P340 | PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340hp254kW | 353hp263kW |
| Torque | 480Nm354lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,010kg4,431lb | 2,055kg4,530lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,835kg6,250lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | 248 km/h 154 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 81.7s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 82.5s99% target: 246 km/h / 153 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.3s | 6.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 24.0s Calculated | 24.0s |
| 0-60 mph | 6.0s Calculated | 5.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 12.1L/100 km19.4mpg US23.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.4s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 169hp/t126kW/t77hp/1000 lb Calculated | 172hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 239Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated | 243Nm/t163lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 620km385mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,995cc183cu in | 2,995cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,797mm189in | 4,930mm194in |
| Width | - | 1,983mm78in |
| Height | 1,683mm66in | 1,698mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,874mm113in | 2,895mm114in |
| Front track | 1,644mm65in | 1,676mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,663mm65in | 1,653mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 251mm10in | 193mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 748L | 772L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,811L | 1,708L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 82L | 75L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 3.0 P340: Power / Torque
- Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 P340 | 5,500-6,500 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6 | 5,400-6,400 rpm | 1,450-4,500 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 P340 | PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.0 s | 5.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.3 s | 6.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 24.0 s | 24.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | 248 km/h 154 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.1 s | 11.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.4 s | 14.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 161 km/h 100 mph | 162 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 P340 | 340 hp 254 kW |
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6 | 353 hp 263 kW |
Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 3.0 V6 has 13 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 3.0 P340.
The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 3.0 P340 and Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 3.0 V6: 13 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 P340 | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft |
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 P340 | 2,010 kg 4,431 lb |
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6 | 2,055 kg 4,530 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 P340 | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6 | 248 km/h 154 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 P340 | 6.3 s |
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6 | 6.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 3.0 V6 and Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 3.0 P340: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 P340 | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6 | 172 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 P340 | 340 hp 254 kW | 6.3 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6 | 353 hp 263 kW | 6.0 s | 248 km/h 154 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 P340 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 P340 | PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp 254 kW | 353 hp 263 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.3 s | 6.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | 248 km/h 154 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,010 kg 4,431 lb | 2,055 kg 4,530 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 620 km 385 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 748 L 26.4 cu ft | 772 L 27.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 172 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 3.0 V6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.1 L/100 km19.4 mpg US23.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.18 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.08 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,815 L479 US gal399 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,176 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 3.0 P340
- Is 45 kg lighter
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 3.0 V6
- Has 13 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 24 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























