Land Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Land Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2020 3.0 P340vsMercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 400d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz GLS (X167)
GLS 400d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 3.0 P340
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.3 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Most powerful340 hp254 kW
- Lightest2,010 kg4,431 lb
- Best power-to-weight169 hp/t126 kW/t5.9 kg/hp
- Largest trunk748 L
- Best overall score73/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 400d
- Highest torque700 Nm516 lb-ft
- Best performance score65/100
- Best economy score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 P340 | Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 400d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340hp254kW | 330hp246kW |
| Torque | 480Nm354lb-ft | 700Nm516lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,010kg4,431lb | 2,430kg5,357lb |
| Gross weight | - | 3,250kg7,165lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 81.7s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 89.8s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.3s | 6.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 24.0s Calculated | 28.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.0s Calculated | 6.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.4s Calculated | 14.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 169hp/t126kW/t77hp/1000 lb Calculated | 136hp/t101kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 239Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated | 288Nm/t193lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 1,111km690mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,995cc183cu in | 2,925cc178cu in |
| Length | 4,797mm189in | 5,207mm205in |
| Width | - | 1,956mm77in |
| Height | 1,683mm66in | 1,838mm72in |
| Wheelbase | 2,874mm113in | 3,135mm123in |
| Front track | 1,644mm65in | 1,669mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,663mm65in | 1,692mm67in |
| Ground clearance | 251mm10in | 215mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 748L | 355L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,811L | 2,400L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 82L | 90L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 3.0 P340: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 400d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 P340 | 5,500-6,500 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 400d | 3,600-4,200 rpm | 1,200-3,200 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 P340 | Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 400d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.0 s | 6.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.3 s | 6.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 24.0 s | 28.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.1 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.4 s | 14.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 161 km/h 100 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 P340 | 340 hp 254 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 400d | 330 hp 246 kW |
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 3.0 P340 has 10 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 400d.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 400d and Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 3.0 P340: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 P340 | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 400d | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 P340 | 2,010 kg 4,431 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 400d | 2,430 kg 5,357 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 P340 | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 400d | 238 km/h 148 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 P340 | 6.3 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 400d | 6.3 s |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 P340 | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 400d | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 P340 | 340 hp 254 kW | 6.3 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 400d | 330 hp 246 kW | 6.3 s | 238 km/h 148 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 P340 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 400d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20203.0 P340 | Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 400d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp 254 kW | 330 hp 246 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.3 s | 6.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | 238 km/h 148 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,010 kg 4,431 lb | 2,430 kg 5,357 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 1,111 km 690 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 748 L 26.4 cu ft | 355 L 12.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 400d |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.17 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,126 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 3.0 P340
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 420 kg lighter
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 33 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 393 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 400d
- Has 220 Nm more
Pros
- Highest torque
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























