Volkswagen Touareg III (CR)
Car comparison
Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSIvsLand Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2020 2.0 P250
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2020
2.0 P250
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Fastest top speed229 km/h142 mph
- Most powerful252 hp188 kW
- Highest torque370 Nm273 lb-ft
- Largest trunk810 L
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 P250
- Lightest1,875 kg4,134 lb
- Best power-to-weight133 hp/t99 kW/t7.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,065 km662 mi
- Best economy score86/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 252hp188kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 370Nm273lb-ft | 365Nm269lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,029kg4,473lb | 1,875kg4,134lb |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 85.8s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 81.6s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.4s Calculated | 40.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 124hp/t93kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated | 195Nm/t130lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 833km518mi Calculated | 1,065km662mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,878mm192in | 4,797mm189in |
| Width | 1,984mm78in | - |
| Height | 1,717mm68in | 1,683mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,899mm114in | 2,874mm113in |
| Front track | 1,669mm66in | 1,644mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,685mm66in | 1,663mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 215mm8in | 251mm10in |
| Trunk volume | 810L | 748L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,800L | 1,811L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 75L | 82L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 P250: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,600-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250 | 5,000 rpm | 1,300-4,500 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.4 s | 40.4 s |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 95 mph | 147 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 252 hp 188 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250 | 250 hp 186 kW |
Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI has 2 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 P250.
The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 P250 and Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250 | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 2,029 kg 4,473 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250 | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250 | 217 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 6.8 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250 | 7.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI and Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 P250: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250 | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 P250 and Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI: 1.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250 | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 833 km 518 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250 | 1,065 km 662 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 252 hp 188 kW | 6.8 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250 | 250 hp 186 kW | 7.5 s | 217 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI |
| 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250 |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250 | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250 | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 252 hp 188 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,029 kg 4,473 lb | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 833 km 518 mi | 1,065 km 662 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 810 L 28.6 cu ft | 748 L 26.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI | Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 P250 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.75 LC100 km | 13.48 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.35 LC100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,350 L357 US gal297 UK gal | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,363 LC/year | 2,021 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Touareg III (CR) 2.0 TSI
- Has 2 hp more
- Has 5 Nm more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 62 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 P250
- Is 154 kg lighter
- Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 232 km (144 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























