Car comparison

Volkswagen Tiguan II · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSIvsLand Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2020 2.0 P250

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen Tiguan II · Facelift 2020

2.0 TSI

245 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2020-2023
VS

Land Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2020

2.0 P250

250 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2020-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.0 s
  • Fastest top speed
    229 km/h
    142 mph
  • Highest torque
    370 Nm
    273 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,613 kg
    3,556 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    152 hp/t
    113 kW/t
    6.6 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.2 L/100 km
    32.7 mpg US
    39.2 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    68/100
  • Best performance score
    58/100
  • Best economy score
    87/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSILand RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250
Power
245hp183kW
250hp186kW
Torque
370Nm273lb-ft
365Nm269lb-ft
Curb weight
1,613kg3,556lb
1,875kg4,134lb
Gross weight
2,230kg4,916lb
-
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
61.5s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
81.6s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.0s
7.5s
0-200 km/h
25.1s
Calculated
40.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.7s
Calculated
7.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
14.2s
Calculated
15.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
152hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb
Calculated
133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
229Nm/t153lb-ft/ton
Calculated
195Nm/t130lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
806km501mi
Calculated
1,065km662mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,509mm178in
4,797mm189in
Width
1,839mm72in
-
Height
1,684mm66in
1,683mm66in
Wheelbase
2,679mm105in
2,874mm113in
Front track
1,586mm62in
1,644mm65in
Rear track
1,576mm62in
1,663mm65in
Ground clearance
201mm8in
251mm10in
Trunk volume
615L
748L
Max trunk volume
1,655L
1,811L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
58L
82L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSILand Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 P250PowerTorque
  • Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 P250: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI5,000 rpm1,600-4,300 rpm5,250 rpm
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P2505,000 rpm1,300-4,500 rpm5,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSILand RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.7 s
7.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.0 s
7.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
25.1 s
40.4 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.2 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.3 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.9 s
13.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.2 s
15.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
163 km/h
101 mph
147 km/h
91 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 P250 has 5 hp more than Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI and Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 P250: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
370 Nm
273 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250
365 Nm
269 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
1,613 kg
3,556 lb
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250
1,875 kg
4,134 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
229 km/h
142 mph
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250
217 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 P250 has more power, Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI and Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 P250: 1.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI and Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 P250: 0.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
152 hp/t
113 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
245 hp
183 kW
6.0 s
229 km/h
142 mph
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250
250 hp
186 kW
7.5 s
217 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h6.0 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
615 L
21.7 cu ft
Length
4,509 mm
177.5 in
Height
1,684 mm
66.3 in
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
748 L
26.4 cu ft
Length
4,797 mm
188.9 in
Height
1,683 mm
66.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h6.0 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
6.0 s
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
7.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
152 hp/t
113 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSILand RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 P250
Power
245 hp
183 kW
250 hp
186 kW
Torque
370 Nm
273 lb-ft
365 Nm
269 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.0 s
7.5 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
1,613 kg
3,556 lb
1,875 kg
4,134 lb
Fuel consumption
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
615 L
21.7 cu ft
Length
4,509 mm
177.5 in
Height
1,684 mm
66.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
748 L
26.4 cu ft
Length
4,797 mm
188.9 in
Height
1,683 mm
66.3 in
Range score
806 km
501 mi
1,065 km
662 mi
Trunk score
615 L
21.7 cu ft
748 L
26.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
152 hp/t
113 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSILand Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 P250
Consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.60 LC100 km13.48 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.28 LC100 mi21.69 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,890 LC/year2,021 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI

  • Has 5 Nm more
  • Is 262 kg lighter
  • Is 1.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 P250

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Has 259 km (161 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 133 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI
Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2.0 P250
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Volkswagen Tiguan II · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI vs Land Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2020 2.0 P250 - car comparison - FastVsFaster