Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 220dvsLand Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2020 2.0 D200
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2020
2.0 D200
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 220d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Fastest top speed219 km/h136 mph
- Lightest1,595 kg3,516 lb
- Best power-to-weight119 hp/t89 kW/t8.4 kg/hp
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score93/100
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 D200
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Highest torque430 Nm317 lb-ft
- Largest trunk748 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 204hp152kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 430Nm317lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,595kg3,516lb | 1,871kg4,125lb |
| Gross weight | 2,190kg4,828lb | - |
| Top speed | 219 km/h 136 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 73.8s99% target: 217 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 88.9s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.8s Calculated | 53.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 7.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated | 109hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 251Nm/t168lb-ft/ton Calculated | 230Nm/t154lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 962km598mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,950cc119cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,410mm174in | 4,797mm189in |
| Width | 1,834mm72in | - |
| Height | 1,611mm63in | 1,683mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,729mm107in | 2,874mm113in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,644mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,606mm63in | 1,663mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 143mm6in | 251mm10in |
| Trunk volume | 425L | 748L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,420L | 1,811L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 60L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 220d: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 D200: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d | 3,800 rpm | 1,600-2,600 rpm | 4,050 rpm |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200 | 4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 7.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.8 s | 53.8 s |
| Top speed | 219 km/h 136 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 141 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d | 190 hp 142 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200 | 204 hp 152 kW |
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 D200 has 14 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 220d.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 220d and Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 D200: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200 | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200 | 1,871 kg 4,125 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200 | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d | 7.3 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200 | 8.2 s |
Although Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 D200 has more power, Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 220d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 220d and Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 D200: 0.9 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200 | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.3 s | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200 | 204 hp 152 kW | 8.2 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 204 hp 152 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 219 km/h 136 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb | 1,871 kg 4,125 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 962 km 598 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | 748 L 26.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 220d |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.28 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.93 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 795 L210 US gal175 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,391 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 220d
- Is 276 kg lighter
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 D200
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Has 323 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























