Land Rover Range Rover Sport III
Car comparison
Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 4.4 V8 P530vsMercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 580 120 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296)
EQS 580 120 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 4.4 V8 P530
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.5 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest2,430 kg5,357 lb
- Best power-to-weight218 hp/t163 kW/t4.6 kg/hp
- Best overall score83/100
- Best performance score82/100
- Best economy score75/100
Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 580 120 kWh
- Most powerful544 hp406 kW
- Highest torque858 Nm633 lb-ft
- Largest trunk565 L
- Best practicality score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Land RoverRange Rover Sport III4.4 V8 P530 | Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 120 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 530hp395kW | 544hp406kW |
| Torque | 750Nm553lb-ft | 858Nm633lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,430kg5,357lb | 2,735kg6,030lb |
| Gross weight | 3,220kg7,099lb | 3,375kg7,441lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 53.8s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 47.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.5s | 4.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.2s Calculated | 22.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.3s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.2L/100 km14.5mpg US17.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 12.6s Calculated | 13.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 218hp/t163kW/t99hp/1000 lb Calculated | 199hp/t148kW/t90hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 309Nm/t207lb-ft/ton Calculated | 314Nm/t210lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 763km474mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 4,395cc268cu in | - |
| Length | 4,946mm195in | 5,125mm202in |
| Width | - | 1,959mm77in |
| Height | 1,820mm72in | 1,718mm68in |
| Wheelbase | 2,997mm118in | 3,210mm126in |
| Front track | 1,702mm67in | 1,668mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,704mm67in | 1,661mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 281mm11in | 178mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 565L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,860L | 2,100L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Land RoverRange Rover Sport III4.4 V8 P530 | Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 120 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.3 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.5 s | 4.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.2 s | 22.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 8.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.6 s | 10.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.6 s | 13.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 184 km/h 114 mph | 170 km/h 106 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III4.4 V8 P530 | 530 hp 395 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 120 kWh | 544 hp 406 kW |
Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 580 120 kWh has 14 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 4.4 V8 P530.
The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 4.4 V8 P530 and Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 580 120 kWh: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III4.4 V8 P530 | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 120 kWh | 858 Nm 633 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III4.4 V8 P530 | 2,430 kg 5,357 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 120 kWh | 2,735 kg 6,030 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III4.4 V8 P530 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 120 kWh | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III4.4 V8 P530 | 4.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 120 kWh | 4.6 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 580 120 kWh has more power, Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 4.4 V8 P530 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 4.4 V8 P530 and Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 580 120 kWh: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III4.4 V8 P530 | 218 hp/t 163 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 120 kWh | 199 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III4.4 V8 P530 | 530 hp 395 kW | 4.5 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 120 kWh | 544 hp 406 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III4.4 V8 P530 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 120 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Land RoverRange Rover Sport III4.4 V8 P530 | Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 580 120 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 530 hp 395 kW | 544 hp 406 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft | 858 Nm 633 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.5 s | 4.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,430 kg 5,357 lb | 2,735 kg 6,030 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 763 km 474 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 565 L 20.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 218 hp/t 163 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 199 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 4.4 V8 P530 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.23 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,098 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 4.4 V8 P530
- Is 305 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 40 km/h (25 mph) higher top speed
- Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 580 120 kWh
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 108 Nm more
- Has 115 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























