Tesla Model X
Car comparison
Tesla Model X 90D 90 kWhvsLand Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017 5.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017
5.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 5.0 V8
- Lightest2,323 kg5,121 lb
- Best power-to-weight226 hp/t169 kW/t4.4 kg/hp
- Largest trunk780 L
- Best overall score81/100
- Best economy score73/100
- Best practicality score93/100
Tesla Model X 90D 90 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.0 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful525 hp391 kW
- Highest torque660 Nm487 lb-ft
- Best performance score79/100
Specification comparison
| Model | TeslaModel X90D 90 kWh | Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20175.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 525hp391kW | 525hp391kW |
| Torque | 660Nm487lb-ft | 625Nm461lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,389kg5,267lb | 2,323kg5,121lb |
| Gross weight | 3,020kg6,658lb | 3,100kg6,834lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 249 km/h 155 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 55.4s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 65.4s99% target: 247 km/h / 153 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.0s | 5.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.3s Calculated | 19.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.8s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 12.8L/100 km18.4mpg US22.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 18L/100 km13.1mpg US15.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.0s Calculated | 13.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 220hp/t164kW/t100hp/1000 lb Calculated | 226hp/t169kW/t103hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 276Nm/t185lb-ft/ton Calculated | 269Nm/t180lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 813km505mi Calculated |
| Displacement | - | 5,000cc305cu in |
| Length | 5,052mm199in | 4,879mm192in |
| Width | 1,999mm79in | - |
| Height | 1,684mm66in | 1,803mm71in |
| Wheelbase | 2,965mm117in | 2,923mm115in |
| Front track | 1,711mm67in | 1,693mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,723mm68in | 1,686mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 223mm9in | 278mm11in |
| Trunk volume | 357L | 780L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,166L | 1,686L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 7 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | - | 104L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 294g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | TeslaModel X90D 90 kWh | Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20175.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.8 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.0 s | 5.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.3 s | 19.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 249 km/h 155 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.6 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.0 s | 11.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.0 s | 13.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 181 km/h 112 mph | 171 km/h 106 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel X90D 90 kWh | 525 hp 391 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 525 hp 391 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel X90D 90 kWh | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 625 Nm 461 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel X90D 90 kWh | 2,389 kg 5,267 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 2,323 kg 5,121 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel X90D 90 kWh | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 249 km/h 155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel X90D 90 kWh | 5.0 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 5.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Tesla Model X 90D 90 kWh and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 5.0 V8: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel X90D 90 kWh | 220 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 226 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| TeslaModel X90D 90 kWh | 525 hp 391 kW | 5.0 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 525 hp 391 kW | 5.3 s | 249 km/h 155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TeslaModel X90D 90 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20175.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | TeslaModel X90D 90 kWh | Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20175.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 525 hp 391 kW | 525 hp 391 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft | 625 Nm 461 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.0 s | 5.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 249 km/h 155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,389 kg 5,267 lb | 2,323 kg 5,121 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 813 km 505 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 294 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 357 L 12.6 cu ft | 780 L 27.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 220 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 226 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.8 L/100 km18.4 mpg US22.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 36.05 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,920 L507 US gal422 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,360 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Tesla Model X 90D 90 kWh
- Has 35 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 5.0 V8
- Is 66 kg lighter
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 423 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























