Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 450 120 kWhvsLand Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017 3.0 P360

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296)

EQS 450 120 kWh

360 hpElectricAWDAutomaticSUV2022-2023
VS

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017

3.0 P360

360 hp2996 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticSUV2019-2022

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 450 120 kWh

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.0 s
  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph Unrestricted
    210 km/h
    130 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    360 hp
    268 kW
  • Highest torque
    800 Nm
    590 lb-ft
  • Largest trunk
    565 L
  • Best overall score
    73/100
  • Best performance score
    66/100
  • Best practicality score
    88/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450 120 kWhLand RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 P360
Power
360hp268kW
360hp268kW
Torque
800Nm590lb-ft
495Nm365lb-ft
Curb weight
2,730kg6,019lb
2,210kg4,872lb
Gross weight
3,375kg7,441lb
3,175kg7,000lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
71.6s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
72.3s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.0s
6.6s
0-200 km/h
32.3s
Calculated
37.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.7s
Calculated
6.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption-
9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.3s
Calculated
14.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
163hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
293Nm/t196lb-ft/ton
Calculated
224Nm/t150lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
1,130km702mi
Calculated
Displacement-
2,996cc183cu in
Length
5,125mm202in
4,879mm192in
Width
1,959mm77in
-
Height
1,718mm68in
1,803mm71in
Wheelbase
3,210mm126in
2,923mm115in
Front track
1,668mm66in
1,692mm67in
Rear track
1,681mm66in
1,686mm66in
Ground clearance
178mm7in
278mm11in
Trunk volume
565L
221L
Max trunk volume
2,100L
1,686L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
7
Fuel tank-
104L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450 120 kWhLand RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 P360
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.7 s
6.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.0 s
6.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
32.3 s
37.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Limited
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.2 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.0 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.2 s
9.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.9 s
12.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.3 s
14.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
156 km/h
97 mph
152 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450 120 kWh
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 P360
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 450 120 kWh and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 P360: 0.6 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450 120 kWh
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 P360
163 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450 120 kWh
360 hp
268 kW
6.0 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 P360
360 hp
268 kW
6.6 s
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450 120 kWh
Power
360 hp
268 kW
0-100 km/h6.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
565 L
20.0 cu ft
Length
5,125 mm
201.8 in
Height
1,718 mm
67.6 in
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 P360
Power
360 hp
268 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
221 L
7.8 cu ft
Length
4,879 mm
192.1 in
Height
1,803 mm
71.0 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450 120 kWhLand RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 P360
Power
360 hp
268 kW
360 hp
268 kW
Torque
800 Nm
590 lb-ft
495 Nm
365 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.0 s
6.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph
Lightness
2,730 kg
6,019 lb
2,210 kg
4,872 lb
Fuel consumption
-
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
565 L
20.0 cu ft
Length
5,125 mm
201.8 in
Height
1,718 mm
67.6 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
221 L
7.8 cu ft
Length
4,879 mm
192.1 in
Height
1,803 mm
71.0 in
Range score
-
1,130 km
702 mi
Trunk score
565 L
20.0 cu ft
221 L
7.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
163 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleLand Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 P360
Consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km16.10 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi25.91 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,415 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 450 120 kWh

  • Has 305 Nm more
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 344 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 450 120 kWh
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 3.0 P360
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 450 120 kWh vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017 3.0 P360 - car comparison - FastVsFaster