Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 450+ 120 kWhvsLand Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017 3.0 P360
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017
3.0 P360
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 P360
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Lightest2,210 kg4,872 lb
- Best power-to-weight163 hp/t121 kW/t6.1 kg/hp
- Largest trunk780 L
- Best overall score71/100
- Best economy score82/100
- Best practicality score93/100
Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 450+ 120 kWh
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful360 hp268 kW
- Highest torque568 Nm419 lb-ft
- Best performance score60/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450+ 120 kWh | Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 P360 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 360hp268kW | 360hp268kW |
| Torque | 568Nm419lb-ft | 495Nm365lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,620kg5,776lb | 2,210kg4,872lb |
| Gross weight | 3,265kg7,198lb | 3,050kg6,724lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 78.3s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 72.3s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 6.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.5s Calculated | 37.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 163hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 217Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated | 224Nm/t150lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 1,130km702mi Calculated |
| Displacement | - | 2,996cc183cu in |
| Length | 5,125mm202in | 4,879mm192in |
| Width | 1,959mm77in | - |
| Height | 1,718mm68in | 1,803mm71in |
| Wheelbase | 3,210mm126in | 2,923mm115in |
| Front track | 1,668mm66in | 1,692mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,681mm66in | 1,686mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 178mm7in | 278mm11in |
| Trunk volume | 565L | 780L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,100L | 1,686L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | - | 104L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450+ 120 kWh | Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 P360 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 6.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.5 s | 37.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Limited | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450+ 120 kWh | 360 hp 268 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 P360 | 360 hp 268 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450+ 120 kWh | 568 Nm 419 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 P360 | 495 Nm 365 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450+ 120 kWh | 2,620 kg 5,776 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 P360 | 2,210 kg 4,872 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450+ 120 kWh | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 P360 | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450+ 120 kWh | 6.7 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 P360 | 6.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 P360 and Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 450+ 120 kWh: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450+ 120 kWh | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 P360 | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450+ 120 kWh | 360 hp 268 kW | 6.7 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 P360 | 360 hp 268 kW | 6.6 s | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450+ 120 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 P360 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450+ 120 kWh | Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20173.0 P360 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 360 hp 268 kW | 360 hp 268 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 568 Nm 419 lb-ft | 495 Nm 365 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 6.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,620 kg 5,776 lb | 2,210 kg 4,872 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 1,130 km 702 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 565 L 20.0 cu ft | 780 L 27.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 P360 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,415 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 450+ 120 kWh
- Has 73 Nm more
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 3.0 P360
- Is 410 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 25 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 215 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























