Land Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Land Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017 3.0 D350vsMercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 450+ 120 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296)
EQS 450+ 120 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 D350
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph Unrestricted225 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Highest torque700 Nm516 lb-ft
- Lightest2,443 kg5,386 lb
- Best power-to-weight144 hp/t107 kW/t7.0 kg/hp
- Largest trunk900 L
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score62/100
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score93/100
Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 450+ 120 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Most powerful360 hp268 kW
Specification comparison
| Model | Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D350 | Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450+ 120 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 351hp262kW | 360hp268kW |
| Torque | 700Nm516lb-ft | 568Nm419lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,443kg5,386lb | 2,620kg5,776lb |
| Gross weight | 3,210kg7,077lb | 3,265kg7,198lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 96.0s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 78.3s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.6s Calculated | 35.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 144hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 287Nm/t192lb-ft/ton Calculated | 217Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,012km629mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,997cc183cu in | - |
| Length | 5,200mm205in | 5,125mm202in |
| Width | - | 1,959mm77in |
| Height | 1,868mm74in | 1,718mm68in |
| Wheelbase | 3,122mm123in | 3,210mm126in |
| Front track | 1,693mm67in | 1,668mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,685mm66in | 1,681mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 297mm12in | 178mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 900L | 565L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,470L | 2,100L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 86L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D350 | Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450+ 120 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.6 s | 35.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D350 | 351 hp 262 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450+ 120 kWh | 360 hp 268 kW |
Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 450+ 120 kWh has 9 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 D350.
The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 D350 and Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 450+ 120 kWh: 9 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D350 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450+ 120 kWh | 568 Nm 419 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D350 | 2,443 kg 5,386 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450+ 120 kWh | 2,620 kg 5,776 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D350 | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450+ 120 kWh | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D350 | 7.2 s |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450+ 120 kWh | 6.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 450+ 120 kWh and Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 D350: 0.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D350 | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450+ 120 kWh | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D350 | 351 hp 262 kW | 7.2 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450+ 120 kWh | 360 hp 268 kW | 6.7 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D350 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450+ 120 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 D350 | Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450+ 120 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 351 hp 262 kW | 360 hp 268 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | 568 Nm 419 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,443 kg 5,386 lb | 2,620 kg 5,776 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,012 km 629 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 900 L 31.8 cu ft | 565 L 20.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 D350 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.94 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,231 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 D350
- Has 132 Nm more
- Is 177 kg lighter
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 335 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 450+ 120 kWh
- Has 9 hp more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























