Land Rover Discovery Sport · Facelift 2019
Car comparison
Land Rover Discovery Sport · Facelift 2019 2.0 D200vsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC60 II
2.0 D4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 D200
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.6 s
- Fastest top speed215 km/h134 mph Unrestricted209 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Highest torque430 Nm317 lb-ft
- Lightest1,873 kg4,129 lb
- Best power-to-weight109 hp/t81 kW/t9.2 kg/hp
- Best estimated range1,226 km762 mi
- Largest trunk897 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score47/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D200 | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 430Nm317lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,873kg4,129lb | 1,921kg4,235lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph Calculated | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 98.8s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 91.9s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.6s | 8.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 50.6s Calculated | 70.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.1s Calculated | 8.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 109hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 99hp/t74kW/t45hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 230Nm/t154lb-ft/ton Calculated | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,226km762mi Calculated | 1,078km670mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,597mm181in | 4,688mm185in |
| Width | - | 1,902mm75in |
| Height | 1,727mm68in | 1,658mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,741mm108in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,636mm64in | 1,668mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,643mm65in | 1,673mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 212mm8in | 216mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 897L | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,794L | 1,432L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 135g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 D200: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D200 | 3,750 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,000 rpm |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 4,250 rpm | 1,740-2,520 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D200 | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.1 s | 8.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.6 s | 8.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 50.6 s | 70.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 16.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 140 km/h 87 mph | 138 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D200 | 204 hp 152 kW |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 D200 has 14 hp more than Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 and Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 D200: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D200 | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D200 | 1,873 kg 4,129 lb |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 1,921 kg 4,235 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D200 | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D200 | 8.6 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 8.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 D200 and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D200 | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D200 | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D200 | 1,226 km 762 mi |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 1,078 km 670 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D200 | 204 hp 152 kW | 8.6 s | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.8 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D200 |
| 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 D200 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D200 | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D200 | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 D200 | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.6 s | 8.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,873 kg 4,129 lb | 1,921 kg 4,235 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,226 km 762 mi | 1,078 km 670 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 135 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 897 L 31.7 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 D200 | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.28 LC100 km | 8.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.93 LC100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 795 L210 US gal175 UK gal | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,391 LC/year | 1,339 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 D200
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 48 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 148 km (92 mi) more estimated range
- Has 392 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























