Land Rover Defender 90 (L663)
Car comparison
Land Rover Defender 90 (L663) 5.0 V8 P525vsMercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 580 120 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz EQS (V297)
EQS 580 120 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 580 120 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.3 s
- Highest torque855 Nm631 lb-ft
- Largest trunk610 L
- Best overall score82/100
- Best performance score80/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Land Rover Defender 90 (L663) 5.0 V8 P525
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Most powerful525 hp391 kW
- Lightest2,471 kg5,448 lb
- Best power-to-weight212 hp/t158 kW/t4.7 kg/hp
- Best economy score73/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Land RoverDefender 90 (L663)5.0 V8 P525 | Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 580 120 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 525hp391kW | 523hp390kW |
| Torque | 625Nm461lb-ft | 855Nm631lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,471kg5,448lb | 2,510kg5,534lb |
| Gross weight | - | 3,060kg6,746lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 102.0s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 50.9s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.2s | 4.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 24.6s Calculated | 23.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.9s Calculated | 4.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.8L/100 km18.4mpg US22.1mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.6s Calculated | 12.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 212hp/t158kW/t96hp/1000 lb Calculated | 208hp/t155kW/t95hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 253Nm/t169lb-ft/ton Calculated | 341Nm/t228lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 703km437mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 5,000cc305cu in | - |
| Length | 4,583mm180in | 5,216mm205in |
| Width | 1,996mm79in | 1,926mm76in |
| Height | 1,969mm78in | 1,512mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,587mm102in | 3,210mm126in |
| Front track | 1,706mm67in | 1,667mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,702mm67in | 1,682mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 291mm11in | 134mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 397L | 610L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,563L | 1,770L |
| Doors | 3 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Land RoverDefender 90 (L663)5.0 V8 P525 | Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 580 120 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.9 s | 4.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.2 s | 4.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 24.6 s | 23.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.6 s | 8.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.3 s | 10.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.6 s | 12.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 161 km/h 100 mph | 170 km/h 106 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverDefender 90 (L663)5.0 V8 P525 | 525 hp 391 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 580 120 kWh | 523 hp 390 kW |
Land Rover Defender 90 (L663) 5.0 V8 P525 has 2 hp more than Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 580 120 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 580 120 kWh and Land Rover Defender 90 (L663) 5.0 V8 P525: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverDefender 90 (L663)5.0 V8 P525 | 625 Nm 461 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 580 120 kWh | 855 Nm 631 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverDefender 90 (L663)5.0 V8 P525 | 2,471 kg 5,448 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 580 120 kWh | 2,510 kg 5,534 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverDefender 90 (L663)5.0 V8 P525 | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 580 120 kWh | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverDefender 90 (L663)5.0 V8 P525 | 5.2 s |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 580 120 kWh | 4.3 s |
Although Land Rover Defender 90 (L663) 5.0 V8 P525 has more power, Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 580 120 kWh is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 580 120 kWh and Land Rover Defender 90 (L663) 5.0 V8 P525: 0.9 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverDefender 90 (L663)5.0 V8 P525 | 212 hp/t 158 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 580 120 kWh | 208 hp/t 155 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverDefender 90 (L663)5.0 V8 P525 | 525 hp 391 kW | 5.2 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 580 120 kWh | 523 hp 390 kW | 4.3 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverDefender 90 (L663)5.0 V8 P525 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 580 120 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Land RoverDefender 90 (L663)5.0 V8 P525 | Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 580 120 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 525 hp 391 kW | 523 hp 390 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 625 Nm 461 lb-ft | 855 Nm 631 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.2 s | 4.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,471 kg 5,448 lb | 2,510 kg 5,534 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 703 km 437 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 397 L 14.0 cu ft | 610 L 21.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 212 hp/t 158 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 208 hp/t 155 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Land Rover Defender 90 (L663) 5.0 V8 P525 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.8 L/100 km18.4 mpg US22.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 36.05 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,920 L507 US gal422 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,360 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Land Rover Defender 90 (L663) 5.0 V8 P525
- Has 2 hp more
- Is 39 kg lighter
- Has 30 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 580 120 kWh
- Has 230 Nm more
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 213 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























