Land Rover Defender 130 (L663)
Car comparison
Land Rover Defender 130 (L663) 5.0 V8 P500vsMercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) AMG EQE 43 100 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294)
AMG EQE 43 100 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) AMG EQE 43 100 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.3 s
- Highest torque858 Nm633 lb-ft
- Lightest2,525 kg5,567 lb
- Best power-to-weight189 hp/t141 kW/t5.3 kg/hp
- Largest trunk520 L
- Best overall score80/100
- Best performance score78/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Land Rover Defender 130 (L663) 5.0 V8 P500
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Most powerful500 hp373 kW
- Best economy score67/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Land RoverDefender 130 (L663)5.0 V8 P500 | Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 43 100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 500hp373kW | 476hp355kW |
| Torque | 610Nm450lb-ft | 858Nm633lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,670kg5,886lb | 2,525kg5,567lb |
| Gross weight | 3,380kg7,452lb | 3,195kg7,044lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 94.2s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 40.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.7s | 4.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 24.6s Calculated | 19.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.4s Calculated | 4.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.9s Calculated | 12.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 187hp/t140kW/t85hp/1000 lb Calculated | 189hp/t141kW/t86hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 228Nm/t153lb-ft/ton Calculated | 340Nm/t227lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 608km378mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 5,000cc305cu in | - |
| Length | 5,358mm211in | 4,879mm192in |
| Width | - | 1,931mm76in |
| Height | 1,970mm78in | 1,672mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 3,022mm119in | 3,030mm119in |
| Front track | 1,707mm67in | 1,654mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,702mm67in | 1,659mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 293mm12in | 184mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 389L | 520L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,516L | 1,675L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Land RoverDefender 130 (L663)5.0 V8 P500 | Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 43 100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.4 s | 4.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.7 s | 4.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 24.6 s | 19.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 5.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.0 s | 8.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 10.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.9 s | 12.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 161 km/h 100 mph | 176 km/h 109 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverDefender 130 (L663)5.0 V8 P500 | 500 hp 373 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 43 100 kWh | 476 hp 355 kW |
Land Rover Defender 130 (L663) 5.0 V8 P500 has 24 hp more than Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) AMG EQE 43 100 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) AMG EQE 43 100 kWh and Land Rover Defender 130 (L663) 5.0 V8 P500: 24 hp (18 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverDefender 130 (L663)5.0 V8 P500 | 610 Nm 450 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 43 100 kWh | 858 Nm 633 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverDefender 130 (L663)5.0 V8 P500 | 2,670 kg 5,886 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 43 100 kWh | 2,525 kg 5,567 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverDefender 130 (L663)5.0 V8 P500 | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 43 100 kWh | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverDefender 130 (L663)5.0 V8 P500 | 5.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 43 100 kWh | 4.3 s |
Although Land Rover Defender 130 (L663) 5.0 V8 P500 has more power, Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) AMG EQE 43 100 kWh is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) AMG EQE 43 100 kWh and Land Rover Defender 130 (L663) 5.0 V8 P500: 1.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverDefender 130 (L663)5.0 V8 P500 | 187 hp/t 140 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 43 100 kWh | 189 hp/t 141 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverDefender 130 (L663)5.0 V8 P500 | 500 hp 373 kW | 5.7 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 43 100 kWh | 476 hp 355 kW | 4.3 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverDefender 130 (L663)5.0 V8 P500 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 43 100 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Land RoverDefender 130 (L663)5.0 V8 P500 | Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 43 100 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 500 hp 373 kW | 476 hp 355 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 610 Nm 450 lb-ft | 858 Nm 633 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.7 s | 4.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,670 kg 5,886 lb | 2,525 kg 5,567 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.8 L/100 km 15.9 mpg US 19.1 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 608 km 378 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 389 L 13.7 cu ft | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 187 hp/t 140 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 189 hp/t 141 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Land Rover Defender 130 (L663) 5.0 V8 P500 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.8 L/100 km15.9 mpg US19.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 25.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 41.68 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,220 L586 US gal488 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,885 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Land Rover Defender 130 (L663) 5.0 V8 P500
- Has 24 hp more
- Has 30 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) AMG EQE 43 100 kWh
- Has 248 Nm more
- Is 145 kg lighter
- Is 1.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 131 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























