Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 500 125 kWhvsLand Rover Defender 110 (L663) 5.0 V8 P425
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Defender 110 (L663)
5.0 V8 P425
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 500 125 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.3 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful449 hp335 kW
- Highest torque828 Nm611 lb-ft
- Best overall score77/100
- Best performance score72/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Land Rover Defender 110 (L663) 5.0 V8 P425
- Lightest2,336 kg5,150 lb
- Best power-to-weight182 hp/t136 kW/t5.5 kg/hp
- Largest trunk972 L
- Best economy score67/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 500 125 kWh | Land RoverDefender 110 (L663)5.0 V8 P425 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 449hp335kW | 426hp318kW |
| Torque | 828Nm611lb-ft | 550Nm406lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,765kg6,096lb | 2,336kg5,150lb |
| Gross weight | 3,410kg7,518lb | 3,230kg7,121lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 209 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 59.4s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 69.0s99% target: 207 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.3s | 5.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.3s Calculated | 42.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.0s Calculated | 5.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.6s Calculated | 14.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 162hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated | 182hp/t136kW/t83hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 299Nm/t200lb-ft/ton Calculated | 235Nm/t158lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 612km380mi Calculated |
| Displacement | - | 5,000cc305cu in |
| Length | 5,125mm202in | 5,018mm198in |
| Width | 1,959mm77in | - |
| Height | 1,718mm68in | 1,967mm77in |
| Wheelbase | 3,210mm126in | 3,022mm119in |
| Front track | 1,668mm66in | 1,706mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,681mm66in | 1,702mm67in |
| Ground clearance | 222mm9in | 293mm12in |
| Trunk volume | 565L | 972L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,100L | 2,277L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | - | 90L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 500 125 kWh | Land RoverDefender 110 (L663)5.0 V8 P425 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.0 s | 5.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.3 s | 5.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.3 s | 42.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Limited | 209 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 9.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.4 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.6 s | 14.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 101 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 500 125 kWh | 449 hp 335 kW |
| Land RoverDefender 110 (L663)5.0 V8 P425 | 426 hp 318 kW |
Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 500 125 kWh has 23 hp more than Land Rover Defender 110 (L663) 5.0 V8 P425.
The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Defender 110 (L663) 5.0 V8 P425 and Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 500 125 kWh: 23 hp (17 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 500 125 kWh | 828 Nm 611 lb-ft |
| Land RoverDefender 110 (L663)5.0 V8 P425 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 500 125 kWh | 2,765 kg 6,096 lb |
| Land RoverDefender 110 (L663)5.0 V8 P425 | 2,336 kg 5,150 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 500 125 kWh | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| Land RoverDefender 110 (L663)5.0 V8 P425 | 209 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 500 125 kWh | 5.3 s |
| Land RoverDefender 110 (L663)5.0 V8 P425 | 5.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 500 125 kWh and Land Rover Defender 110 (L663) 5.0 V8 P425: 0.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 500 125 kWh | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
| Land RoverDefender 110 (L663)5.0 V8 P425 | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 500 125 kWh | 449 hp 335 kW | 5.3 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| Land RoverDefender 110 (L663)5.0 V8 P425 | 426 hp 318 kW | 5.8 s | 209 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 500 125 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverDefender 110 (L663)5.0 V8 P425 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 500 125 kWh | Land RoverDefender 110 (L663)5.0 V8 P425 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 449 hp 335 kW | 426 hp 318 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 828 Nm 611 lb-ft | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.3 s | 5.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 209 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,765 kg 6,096 lb | 2,336 kg 5,150 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 612 km 380 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 565 L 20.0 cu ft | 972 L 34.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Land Rover Defender 110 (L663) 5.0 V8 P425 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.7 L/100 km16 mpg US19.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 25.72 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 41.40 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,205 L582 US gal485 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,859 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV (X296) EQS 500 125 kWh
- Has 23 hp more
- Has 278 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Land Rover Defender 110 (L663) 5.0 V8 P425
- Is 429 kg lighter
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 407 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























