Car comparison

Land Rover Defender 110 (L663) 3.0 P400vsPolestar 2 78 kWh

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Land Rover Defender 110 (L663)

3.0 P400

400 hp2996 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbocharged2019-2024
VS

Polestar 2

78 kWh

408 hpElectricAWDAutomaticLiftback / fastback2020-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Polestar 2 78 kWh

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.7 s
  • Most powerful
    408 hp
    304 kW
  • Highest torque
    660 Nm
    487 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    2,113 kg
    4,658 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    193 hp/t
    144 kW/t
    5.2 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    76/100
  • Best performance score
    72/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelLand RoverDefender 110 (L663)3.0 P400Polestar278 kWh
Power
400hp298kW
408hp304kW
Torque
550Nm406lb-ft
660Nm487lb-ft
Curb weight
2,286kg5,040lb
2,113kg4,658lb
Gross weight
3,165kg6,978lb
2,600kg5,732lb
Top speed
208 km/h
129 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
To 99% top speed
90.6s99% target: 206 km/h / 128 mph
Calculated
52.4s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.1s
4.7s
0-200 km/h
56.2s
Calculated
40.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.7s
Calculated
4.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption city
12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
14.5s
Calculated
13.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
175hp/t130kW/t79hp/1000 lb
Calculated
193hp/t144kW/t88hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton
Calculated
312Nm/t209lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
909km565mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
2,996cc183cu in
-
Length
5,018mm198in
4,606mm181in
Width
1,996mm79in
1,800mm71in
Height
1,967mm77in
1,479mm58in
Wheelbase
3,022mm119in
2,735mm108in
Front track
1,704mm67in
1,602mm63in
Rear track
1,700mm67in
1,601mm63in
Ground clearance
291mm11in
151mm6in
Trunk volume
1,075L
-
Max trunk volume
2,380L
440L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
90L
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricLand RoverDefender 110 (L663)3.0 P400Polestar278 kWh
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.7 s
4.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.1 s
4.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
56.2 s
40.0 s
Top speed
208 km/h
129 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.0 s
1.9 s
330 ft
101 m
5.8 s
5.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.1 s
8.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.0 s
11.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.5 s
13.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
147 km/h
91 mph
161 km/h
100 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverDefender 110 (L663)3.0 P400
400 hp
298 kW
Polestar278 kWh
408 hp
304 kW

Polestar 2 78 kWh has 8 hp more than Land Rover Defender 110 (L663) 3.0 P400.

The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Defender 110 (L663) 3.0 P400 and Polestar 2 78 kWh: 8 hp (6 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverDefender 110 (L663)3.0 P400
550 Nm
406 lb-ft
Polestar278 kWh
660 Nm
487 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverDefender 110 (L663)3.0 P400
2,286 kg
5,040 lb
Polestar278 kWh
2,113 kg
4,658 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverDefender 110 (L663)3.0 P400
208 km/h
129 mph
Polestar278 kWh
205 km/h
127 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverDefender 110 (L663)3.0 P4006.1 s
Polestar278 kWh4.7 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Polestar 2 78 kWh and Land Rover Defender 110 (L663) 3.0 P400: 1.4 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverDefender 110 (L663)3.0 P400
175 hp/t
130 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
Polestar278 kWh
193 hp/t
144 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Land RoverDefender 110 (L663)3.0 P400
400 hp
298 kW
6.1 s
208 km/h
129 mph
Polestar278 kWh
408 hp
304 kW
4.7 s
205 km/h
127 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Land RoverDefender 110 (L663)3.0 P400
Power
400 hp
298 kW
0-100 km/h6.1 s
Top speed
208 km/h
129 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
1,075 L
38.0 cu ft
Length
5,018 mm
197.6 in
Height
1,967 mm
77.4 in
Polestar278 kWh
Power
408 hp
304 kW
0-100 km/h4.7 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
440 L
15.5 cu ft
Length
4,606 mm
181.3 in
Height
1,479 mm
58.2 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleLand RoverDefender 110 (L663)3.0 P400Polestar278 kWh
Power
400 hp
298 kW
408 hp
304 kW
Torque
550 Nm
406 lb-ft
660 Nm
487 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.1 s
4.7 s
Top speed
208 km/h
129 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
Lightness
2,286 kg
5,040 lb
2,113 kg
4,658 lb
Fuel consumption
9.9 L/100 km
23.8 mpg US
28.5 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
1,075 L
38.0 cu ft
Length
5,018 mm
197.6 in
Height
1,967 mm
77.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
440 L
15.5 cu ft
Length
4,606 mm
181.3 in
Height
1,479 mm
58.2 in
Range score
909 km
565 mi
-
Trunk score
1,075 L
38.0 cu ft
440 L
15.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
175 hp/t
130 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
193 hp/t
144 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleLand Rover Defender 110 (L663) 3.0 P400
Consumption9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km17.33 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi27.88 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,485 L392 US gal327 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,599 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Polestar 2 78 kWh

  • Has 8 hp more
  • Has 110 Nm more
  • Is 173 kg lighter
  • Is 1.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Land Rover Defender 110 (L663) 3.0 P400
Polestar 2 78 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.0 P400
55 95 kWh
VS
Land RoverDefender 110 (L663)3.0 P400vsAUDIe-tron Sportback55 95 kWh
78 kWh
100 kWh
VS
Polestar278 kWhvsAUDIE5 Sportback100 kWh
3.0 P400
55 114 kWh
VS
Land RoverDefender 110 (L663)3.0 P400vsAUDIQ8 e-tron55 114 kWh
78 kWh
2.9 TFSI V6
VS
Polestar278 kWhvsAUDIS7 Sportback (C8)2.9 TFSI V6
3.0 P400
55 114 kWh
VS
Land RoverDefender 110 (L663)3.0 P400vsAUDIQ8 e-tron Sportback55 114 kWh
78 kWh
EQS 500 120 kWh
VS
Polestar278 kWhvsMercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 500 120 kWh
3.0 P400
55 95 kWh
VS
Land RoverDefender 110 (L663)3.0 P400vsAUDIe-tron55 95 kWh
78 kWh
performance 100 kWh
VS
Polestar278 kWhvsAUDIA6 Sportback e-tron (GH)performance 100 kWh
3.0 P400
EV400 90 kWh
VS
Land RoverDefender 110 (L663)3.0 P400vsJaguarI-PaceEV400 90 kWh
78 kWh
3.0 TFSI V6
VS
Polestar278 kWhvsAUDIS5 Sportback (F5)Facelift 20193.0 TFSI V6
3.0 P400
EQE 500 100 kWh
VS
Land RoverDefender 110 (L663)3.0 P400vsMercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 500 100 kWh
78 kWh
100D 100 kWh
VS
Polestar278 kWhvsTeslaModel SFacelift 2016100D 100 kWh
Land Rover Defender 110 (L663) 3.0 P400 vs Polestar 2 78 kWh - car comparison - FastVsFaster