Lancia Delta III (844)
Car comparison
Lancia Delta III (844) 1.8 Di T-Jet 16VvsRenault Megane III GT 2.0 TCe
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Megane III
GT 2.0 TCe
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lancia Delta III (844) 1.8 Di T-Jet 16V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight140 hp/t104 kW/t7.2 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Largest trunk420 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Renault Megane III GT 2.0 TCe
- Lightest1,320 kg2,910 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range779 km484 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | LanciaDelta III (844)1.8 Di T-Jet 16V | RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,430kg3,153lb | 1,320kg2,910lb |
| Gross weight | 2,000kg4,409lb | 1,830kg4,034lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 85.4s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 89.0s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.9s Calculated | 34.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 140hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated | 136hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 224Nm/t150lb-ft/ton Calculated | 227Nm/t152lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 744km462mi Calculated | 779km484mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,742cc106cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,520mm178in | 4,295mm169in |
| Width | 1,797mm71in | 1,808mm71in |
| Height | 1,499mm59in | 1,471mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,700mm106in | 2,641mm104in |
| Front track | 1,538mm61in | 1,546mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,531mm60in | 1,547mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 120mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 420L | 405L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,190L | 1,162L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 178g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lancia Delta III (844) 1.8 Di T-Jet 16V: Power / Torque
- Renault Megane III GT 2.0 TCe: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LanciaDelta III (844)1.8 Di T-Jet 16V | 5,000 rpm | 1,400 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe | 5,500 rpm | 2,250 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LanciaDelta III (844)1.8 Di T-Jet 16V | RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.9 s | 34.4 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LanciaDelta III (844)1.8 Di T-Jet 16V | 200 hp 149 kW |
| RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe | 180 hp 134 kW |
Lancia Delta III (844) 1.8 Di T-Jet 16V has 20 hp more than Renault Megane III GT 2.0 TCe.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Megane III GT 2.0 TCe and Lancia Delta III (844) 1.8 Di T-Jet 16V: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LanciaDelta III (844)1.8 Di T-Jet 16V | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LanciaDelta III (844)1.8 Di T-Jet 16V | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb |
| RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LanciaDelta III (844)1.8 Di T-Jet 16V | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LanciaDelta III (844)1.8 Di T-Jet 16V | 7.4 s |
| RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe | 7.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lancia Delta III (844) 1.8 Di T-Jet 16V and Renault Megane III GT 2.0 TCe: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LanciaDelta III (844)1.8 Di T-Jet 16V | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LanciaDelta III (844)1.8 Di T-Jet 16V | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
| RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LanciaDelta III (844)1.8 Di T-Jet 16V | 744 km 462 mi |
| RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe | 779 km 484 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LanciaDelta III (844)1.8 Di T-Jet 16V | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.4 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.8 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LanciaDelta III (844)1.8 Di T-Jet 16V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LanciaDelta III (844)1.8 Di T-Jet 16V |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Lancia Delta III (844) 1.8 Di T-Jet 16V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LanciaDelta III (844)1.8 Di T-Jet 16V | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LanciaDelta III (844)1.8 Di T-Jet 16V | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LanciaDelta III (844)1.8 Di T-Jet 16V | RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 744 km 462 mi | 779 km 484 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 178 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | 405 L 14.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lancia Delta III (844) 1.8 Di T-Jet 16V | Renault Megane III GT 2.0 TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.65 LC100 km | 13.48 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,048 LC/year | 2,021 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lancia Delta III (844) 1.8 Di T-Jet 16V
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 15 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Renault Megane III GT 2.0 TCe
- Is 110 kg lighter
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 36 km (22 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























