Lamborghini Urus
Car comparison
Lamborghini Urus S 4.0 V8vsMercedes-Benz GLS (X167) AMG GLS 63 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz GLS (X167)
AMG GLS 63 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lamborghini Urus S 4.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.5 s
- Fastest top speed305 km/h190 mph
- Most powerful666 hp497 kW
- Highest torque850 Nm627 lb-ft
- Lightest2,197 kg4,844 lb
- Best power-to-weight303 hp/t226 kW/t3.3 kg/hp
- Largest trunk616 L
- Best overall score90/100
- Best performance score90/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) AMG GLS 63 V8
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.0 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range750 km466 mi
- Best economy score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | LamborghiniUrusS 4.0 V8 | Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)AMG GLS 63 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 666hp497kW | 612hp456kW |
| Torque | 850Nm627lb-ft | 850Nm627lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,197kg4,844lb | 2,555kg5,633lb |
| Gross weight | - | 3,395kg7,485lb |
| Top speed | 305 km/h 190 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 82.4s99% target: 302 km/h / 188 mph Calculated | 51.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.5s | 4.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.5s | 14.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.3s Calculated | 4.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 15.4L/100 km15.3mpg US18.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.6s Calculated | 12.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 303hp/t226kW/t138hp/1000 lb Calculated | 240hp/t179kW/t109hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 387Nm/t259lb-ft/ton Calculated | 333Nm/t223lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 603km375mi Calculated | 750km466mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,996cc244cu in | 3,982cc243cu in |
| Length | 5,112mm201in | - |
| Width | 2,018mm79in | - |
| Height | 1,638mm64in | - |
| Wheelbase | 3,003mm118in | 3,135mm123in |
| Front track | 1,695mm67in | - |
| Rear track | 1,710mm67in | - |
| Trunk volume | 616L | 355L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 2,400L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 90L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lamborghini Urus S 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) AMG GLS 63 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniUrusS 4.0 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 2,300-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)AMG GLS 63 V8 | 5,750-6,500 rpm | 2,500-4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LamborghiniUrusS 4.0 V8 | Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)AMG GLS 63 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.3 s | 4.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.5 s | 4.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.5 s | 14.4 s |
| Top speed | 305 km/h 190 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.8 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.9 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.5 s | 8.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.7 s | 10.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.6 s | 12.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 193 km/h 120 mph | 187 km/h 116 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniUrusS 4.0 V8 | 666 hp 497 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)AMG GLS 63 V8 | 612 hp 456 kW |
Lamborghini Urus S 4.0 V8 has 54 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) AMG GLS 63 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) AMG GLS 63 V8 and Lamborghini Urus S 4.0 V8: 54 hp (40 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniUrusS 4.0 V8 | 850 Nm 627 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)AMG GLS 63 V8 | 850 Nm 627 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniUrusS 4.0 V8 | 2,197 kg 4,844 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)AMG GLS 63 V8 | 2,555 kg 5,633 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniUrusS 4.0 V8 | 305 km/h 190 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)AMG GLS 63 V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniUrusS 4.0 V8 | 3.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)AMG GLS 63 V8 | 4.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lamborghini Urus S 4.0 V8 and Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) AMG GLS 63 V8: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniUrusS 4.0 V8 | 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)AMG GLS 63 V8 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) AMG GLS 63 V8 and Lamborghini Urus S 4.0 V8: 2.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniUrusS 4.0 V8 | 303 hp/t 226 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)AMG GLS 63 V8 | 240 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniUrusS 4.0 V8 | 603 km 375 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)AMG GLS 63 V8 | 750 km 466 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniUrusS 4.0 V8 | 666 hp 497 kW | 3.5 s | 305 km/h 190 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)AMG GLS 63 V8 | 612 hp 456 kW | 4.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniUrusS 4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)AMG GLS 63 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniUrusS 4.0 V8 |
| 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)AMG GLS 63 V8 |
| 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) AMG GLS 63 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniUrusS 4.0 V8 | 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK | 3.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)AMG GLS 63 V8 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniUrusS 4.0 V8 | 303 hp/t 226 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)AMG GLS 63 V8 | 240 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LamborghiniUrusS 4.0 V8 | Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)AMG GLS 63 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 666 hp 497 kW | 612 hp 456 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 850 Nm 627 lb-ft | 850 Nm 627 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.5 s | 4.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 305 km/h 190 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,197 kg 4,844 lb | 2,555 kg 5,633 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 603 km 375 mi | 750 km 466 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 616 L 21.8 cu ft | 355 L 12.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 303 hp/t 226 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 240 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lamborghini Urus S 4.0 V8 | Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) AMG GLS 63 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.1 L/100 km16.7 mpg US20 mpg UK | 12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 24.68 LC100 km | 21.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 39.71 LC100 mi | 33.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,115 L559 US gal465 UK gal | 1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,701 LC/year | 3,150 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lamborghini Urus S 4.0 V8
- Has 54 hp more
- Is 358 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 45 km/h (28 mph) higher top speed
- Has 64 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 261 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) AMG GLS 63 V8
- Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 147 km (91 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























