Lamborghini Urus
Car comparison
Lamborghini Urus Performante 4.0 V8vsMG IM6 100 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMG IM6
100 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lamborghini Urus Performante 4.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.3 s
- Fastest top speed306 km/h190 mph
- Highest torque850 Nm627 lb-ft
- Lightest2,150 kg4,740 lb
- Best overall score90/100
- Best performance score90/100
- Best economy score0/100
MG IM6 100 kWh
- Most powerful778 hp580 kW
- Best power-to-weight318 hp/t237 kW/t3.1 kg/hp
- Largest trunk646 L
- Best practicality score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | LamborghiniUrusPerformante 4.0 V8 | MGIM6100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 666hp497kW | 778hp580kW |
| Torque | 850Nm627lb-ft | 802Nm592lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,150kg4,740lb | 2,445kg5,390lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,861kg6,307lb |
| Top speed | 306 km/h 190 mph | 239 km/h 149 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 73.9s99% target: 303 km/h / 188 mph Calculated | 30.2s99% target: 237 km/h / 147 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.3s | 3.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.5s | 11.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.1s Calculated | 3.2s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 11.3s Calculated | 11.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 310hp/t231kW/t141hp/1000 lb Calculated | 318hp/t237kW/t144hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 395Nm/t265lb-ft/ton Calculated | 328Nm/t219lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,996cc244cu in | - |
| Length | 5,137mm202in | 4,904mm193in |
| Width | 2,026mm80in | 1,988mm78in |
| Height | 1,618mm64in | 1,669mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 3,006mm118in | 2,950mm116in |
| Front track | 1,711mm67in | - |
| Rear track | 1,718mm68in | - |
| Ground clearance | - | 161mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 616L | 646L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,621L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LamborghiniUrusPerformante 4.0 V8 | MGIM6100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.1 s | 3.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.3 s | 3.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.5 s | 11.7 s |
| Top speed | 306 km/h 190 mph | 239 km/h 149 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.7 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.8 s | 4.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.3 s | 7.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.5 s | 9.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.3 s | 11.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 198 km/h 123 mph | 198 km/h 123 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniUrusPerformante 4.0 V8 | 666 hp 497 kW |
| MGIM6100 kWh | 778 hp 580 kW |
MG IM6 100 kWh has 112 hp more than Lamborghini Urus Performante 4.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Lamborghini Urus Performante 4.0 V8 and MG IM6 100 kWh: 112 hp (84 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniUrusPerformante 4.0 V8 | 850 Nm 627 lb-ft |
| MGIM6100 kWh | 802 Nm 592 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniUrusPerformante 4.0 V8 | 2,150 kg 4,740 lb |
| MGIM6100 kWh | 2,445 kg 5,390 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniUrusPerformante 4.0 V8 | 306 km/h 190 mph |
| MGIM6100 kWh | 239 km/h 149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniUrusPerformante 4.0 V8 | 3.3 s |
| MGIM6100 kWh | 3.4 s |
Although MG IM6 100 kWh has more power, Lamborghini Urus Performante 4.0 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lamborghini Urus Performante 4.0 V8 and MG IM6 100 kWh: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniUrusPerformante 4.0 V8 | 310 hp/t 231 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp |
| MGIM6100 kWh | 318 hp/t 237 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniUrusPerformante 4.0 V8 | 666 hp 497 kW | 3.3 s | 306 km/h 190 mph |
| MGIM6100 kWh | 778 hp 580 kW | 3.4 s | 239 km/h 149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniUrusPerformante 4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MGIM6100 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LamborghiniUrusPerformante 4.0 V8 | MGIM6100 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 666 hp 497 kW | 778 hp 580 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 850 Nm 627 lb-ft | 802 Nm 592 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.3 s | 3.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 306 km/h 190 mph | 239 km/h 149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,150 kg 4,740 lb | 2,445 kg 5,390 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 616 L 21.8 cu ft | 646 L 22.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 310 hp/t 231 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 318 hp/t 237 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lamborghini Urus Performante 4.0 V8
- Has 48 Nm more
- Is 295 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 67 km/h (42 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
MG IM6 100 kWh
- Has 112 hp more
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 30 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























