Lamborghini Reventon
Car comparison
Lamborghini Reventon 6.5 V12vsMercedes-Benz SLR McLaren (C199) 5.5 V8 Kompressor
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz SLR McLaren (C199)
5.5 V8 Kompressor
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lamborghini Reventon 6.5 V12
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.4 s
- Fastest top speed340 km/h211 mph
- Most powerful640 hp477 kW
- Lightest1,665 kg3,671 lb
- Best power-to-weight384 hp/t287 kW/t2.6 kg/hp
- Best overall score75/100
- Best performance score92/100
- Best practicality score38/100
Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren (C199) 5.5 V8 Kompressor
- Highest torque780 Nm575 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption14.5 L/100 km16.2 mpg US19.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption20.9 L/100 km11.3 mpg US13.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK
- Best economy score68/100
Specification comparison
| Model | LamborghiniReventon6.5 V12 | Mercedes-BenzSLR McLaren (C199)5.5 V8 Kompressor |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 640hp477kW | 626hp467kW |
| Torque | 660Nm487lb-ft | 780Nm575lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,665kg3,671lb | 1,693kg3,732lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,940kg4,277lb |
| Top speed | 340 km/h 211 mph | 334 km/h 208 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 50.3s99% target: 337 km/h / 209 mph Calculated | 61.6s99% target: 331 km/h / 205 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.4s | 3.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 9.0s Calculated | 10.6s |
| 0-60 mph | 3.3s Calculated | 3.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 21.3L/100 km11mpg US13.3mpg UK | 14.5L/100 km16.2mpg US19.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 32.3L/100 km7.3mpg US8.7mpg UK | 20.9L/100 km11.3mpg US13.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.9s Calculated | 11.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 384hp/t287kW/t174hp/1000 lb Calculated | 370hp/t276kW/t168hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 396Nm/t265lb-ft/ton Calculated | 461Nm/t308lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 669km416mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 6,496cc396cu in | 5,439cc332cu in |
| Length | 4,700mm185in | 4,656mm183in |
| Width | 2,058mm81in | 1,908mm75in |
| Height | 1,135mm45in | 1,261mm50in |
| Wheelbase | 2,665mm105in | 2,700mm106in |
| Front track | 1,635mm64in | 1,638mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,695mm67in | 1,569mm62in |
| Trunk volume | - | 272L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | - | 97L |
| CO2 emissions | 495g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lamborghini Reventon 6.5 V12: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren (C199) 5.5 V8 Kompressor: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniReventon6.5 V12 | 8,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm | 8,250 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzSLR McLaren (C199)5.5 V8 Kompressor | 6,500 rpm | 3,250-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LamborghiniReventon6.5 V12 | Mercedes-BenzSLR McLaren (C199)5.5 V8 Kompressor |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.3 s | 3.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.4 s | 3.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 9.0 s | 10.6 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 31.4 s | 43.1 s |
| Top speed | 340 km/h 211 mph | 334 km/h 208 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.9 s | 5.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.3 s | 7.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.2 s | 9.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.9 s | 11.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 222 km/h 138 mph | 209 km/h 130 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniReventon6.5 V12 | 640 hp 477 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzSLR McLaren (C199)5.5 V8 Kompressor | 626 hp 467 kW |
Lamborghini Reventon 6.5 V12 has 14 hp more than Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren (C199) 5.5 V8 Kompressor.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren (C199) 5.5 V8 Kompressor and Lamborghini Reventon 6.5 V12: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniReventon6.5 V12 | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzSLR McLaren (C199)5.5 V8 Kompressor | 780 Nm 575 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniReventon6.5 V12 | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzSLR McLaren (C199)5.5 V8 Kompressor | 1,693 kg 3,732 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniReventon6.5 V12 | 340 km/h 211 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSLR McLaren (C199)5.5 V8 Kompressor | 334 km/h 208 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniReventon6.5 V12 | 3.4 s |
| Mercedes-BenzSLR McLaren (C199)5.5 V8 Kompressor | 3.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lamborghini Reventon 6.5 V12 and Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren (C199) 5.5 V8 Kompressor: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniReventon6.5 V12 | 21.3 L/100 km 11.0 mpg US 13.3 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzSLR McLaren (C199)5.5 V8 Kompressor | 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren (C199) 5.5 V8 Kompressor and Lamborghini Reventon 6.5 V12: 6.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniReventon6.5 V12 | 384 hp/t 287 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzSLR McLaren (C199)5.5 V8 Kompressor | 370 hp/t 276 kW/t 2.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniReventon6.5 V12 | 640 hp 477 kW | 3.4 s | 340 km/h 211 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSLR McLaren (C199)5.5 V8 Kompressor | 626 hp 467 kW | 3.8 s | 334 km/h 208 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniReventon6.5 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzSLR McLaren (C199)5.5 V8 Kompressor |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniReventon6.5 V12 |
| 21.3 L/100 km 11.0 mpg US 13.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzSLR McLaren (C199)5.5 V8 Kompressor |
| 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren (C199) 5.5 V8 Kompressor is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniReventon6.5 V12 | 21.3 L/100 km 11.0 mpg US 13.3 mpg UK | 3.4 s |
| Mercedes-BenzSLR McLaren (C199)5.5 V8 Kompressor | 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK | 3.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniReventon6.5 V12 | 384 hp/t 287 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp | 21.3 L/100 km 11.0 mpg US 13.3 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzSLR McLaren (C199)5.5 V8 Kompressor | 370 hp/t 276 kW/t 2.7 kg/hp | 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LamborghiniReventon6.5 V12 | Mercedes-BenzSLR McLaren (C199)5.5 V8 Kompressor | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 640 hp 477 kW | 626 hp 467 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft | 780 Nm 575 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.4 s | 3.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 340 km/h 211 mph | 334 km/h 208 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb | 1,693 kg 3,732 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 21.3 L/100 km 11.0 mpg US 13.3 mpg UK | 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 669 km 416 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 495 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 272 L 9.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 384 hp/t 287 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp | 370 hp/t 276 kW/t 2.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lamborghini Reventon 6.5 V12 | Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren (C199) 5.5 V8 Kompressor |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 21.3 L/100 km11 mpg US13.3 mpg UK | 14.5 L/100 km16.2 mpg US19.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 37.28 LC100 km | 25.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 59.99 LC100 mi | 40.84 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 3,195 L844 US gal703 UK gal | 2,175 L575 US gal478 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 5,591 LC/year | 3,806 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lamborghini Reventon 6.5 V12
- Has 14 hp more
- Is 28 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren (C199) 5.5 V8 Kompressor
- Has 120 Nm more
- Uses 6.8 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























