Lamborghini Huracan EVO Spyder · Facelift 2019
Car comparison
Lamborghini Huracan EVO Spyder · Facelift 2019 5.2 V10vsLamborghini Huracan STO · Facelift 2020 5.2 V10
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLamborghini Huracan STO · Facelift 2020
5.2 V10
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lamborghini Huracan EVO Spyder Facelift 2019 5.2 V10
- Fastest top speed335 km/h208 mph Unrestricted325 km/h202 mph Restricted
- Most powerful640 hp477 kW
- Highest torque600 Nm443 lb-ft
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score92/100
- Best economy score69/100
- Best practicality score35/100
Lamborghini Huracan STO Facelift 2020 5.2 V10
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.0 s
- Lightest1,339 kg2,952 lb
- Best power-to-weight478 hp/t356 kW/t2.1 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | LamborghiniHuracan EVO SpyderFacelift 20195.2 V10 | LamborghiniHuracan STOFacelift 20205.2 V10 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 640hp477kW | 640hp477kW |
| Torque | 600Nm443lb-ft | 565Nm417lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,542kg3,400lb | 1,339kg2,952lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 325 km/h202 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 61.8s99% target: 332 km/h / 206 mph Calculated | 54.9s99% target: 322 km/h / 200 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.1s | 3.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 9.3s | 9.0s |
| 0-60 mph | 3.0s Calculated | 2.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 10.8s Calculated | 10.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 415hp/t309kW/t188hp/1000 lb Calculated | 478hp/t356kW/t217hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 389Nm/t260lb-ft/ton Calculated | 422Nm/t282lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 589km366mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 5,204cc318cu in | 5,204cc318cu in |
| Length | 4,520mm178in | 4,549mm179in |
| Width | 1,933mm76in | 1,945mm77in |
| Height | 1,180mm46in | 1,220mm48in |
| Wheelbase | 2,620mm103in | 2,620mm103in |
| Front track | 1,668mm66in | 1,688mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,620mm64in | 1,647mm65in |
| Trunk volume | - | 38L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 83L | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | 338g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lamborghini Huracan EVO Spyder Facelift 2019 5.2 V10: Power / Torque
- Lamborghini Huracan STO Facelift 2020 5.2 V10: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniHuracan EVO SpyderFacelift 20195.2 V10 | 8,000 rpm | 6,500 rpm | 8,250 rpm |
| LamborghiniHuracan STOFacelift 20205.2 V10 | 8,000 rpm | 6,500 rpm | 8,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LamborghiniHuracan EVO SpyderFacelift 20195.2 V10 | LamborghiniHuracan STOFacelift 20205.2 V10 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.0 s | 2.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.1 s | 3.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 9.3 s | 9.0 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 41.0 s | 55.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 325 km/h202 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.8 s | 1.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.7 s | 4.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.0 s | 7.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.1 s | 9.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.8 s | 10.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 215 km/h 134 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniHuracan EVO SpyderFacelift 20195.2 V10 | 640 hp 477 kW |
| LamborghiniHuracan STOFacelift 20205.2 V10 | 640 hp 477 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniHuracan EVO SpyderFacelift 20195.2 V10 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
| LamborghiniHuracan STOFacelift 20205.2 V10 | 565 Nm 417 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniHuracan EVO SpyderFacelift 20195.2 V10 | 1,542 kg 3,400 lb |
| LamborghiniHuracan STOFacelift 20205.2 V10 | 1,339 kg 2,952 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniHuracan EVO SpyderFacelift 20195.2 V10 | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph |
| LamborghiniHuracan STOFacelift 20205.2 V10 | Unrestricted 325 km/h202 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniHuracan EVO SpyderFacelift 20195.2 V10 | 3.1 s |
| LamborghiniHuracan STOFacelift 20205.2 V10 | 3.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lamborghini Huracan STO Facelift 2020 5.2 V10 and Lamborghini Huracan EVO Spyder Facelift 2019 5.2 V10: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniHuracan EVO SpyderFacelift 20195.2 V10 | 415 hp/t 309 kW/t 2.4 kg/hp |
| LamborghiniHuracan STOFacelift 20205.2 V10 | 478 hp/t 356 kW/t 2.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniHuracan EVO SpyderFacelift 20195.2 V10 | 640 hp 477 kW | 3.1 s | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph |
| LamborghiniHuracan STOFacelift 20205.2 V10 | 640 hp 477 kW | 3.0 s | Unrestricted 325 km/h202 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniHuracan EVO SpyderFacelift 20195.2 V10 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LamborghiniHuracan STOFacelift 20205.2 V10 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LamborghiniHuracan EVO SpyderFacelift 20195.2 V10 | LamborghiniHuracan STOFacelift 20205.2 V10 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 640 hp 477 kW | 640 hp 477 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | 565 Nm 417 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.1 s | 3.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph | Unrestricted 325 km/h202 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,542 kg 3,400 lb | 1,339 kg 2,952 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 589 km 366 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 338 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 38 L 1.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 415 hp/t 309 kW/t 2.4 kg/hp | 478 hp/t 356 kW/t 2.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lamborghini Huracan EVO Spyder Facelift 2019 5.2 V10 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.1 L/100 km16.7 mpg US20 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 24.68 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 39.71 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,115 L559 US gal465 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,701 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lamborghini Huracan EVO Spyder Facelift 2019 5.2 V10
- Has 35 Nm more
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Lamborghini Huracan STO Facelift 2020 5.2 V10
- Is 203 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 63 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























