Lexus LFA
Car comparison
Lexus LFA 4.8 V10vsLamborghini Gallardo LP 560-4 5.2i V10
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLamborghini Gallardo LP 560-4
5.2i V10
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lamborghini Gallardo LP 560-4 5.2i V10
- Highest torque540 Nm398 lb-ft
- Lightest1,455 kg3,208 lb
- Best power-to-weight385 hp/t287 kW/t2.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption13.3 L/100 km17.7 mpg US21.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption20.1 L/100 km11.7 mpg US14.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions315 g/km
- Best estimated range677 km420 mi
- Best performance score88/100
- Best economy score71/100
Lexus LFA 4.8 V10
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.7 s
- Fastest top speed335 km/h208 mph Unrestricted325 km/h202 mph Restricted
- Most powerful560 hp418 kW
- Best overall score72/100
- Best practicality score39/100
Specification comparison
| Model | LexusLFA4.8 V10 | LamborghiniGallardo LP 560-45.2i V10 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 560hp418kW | 560hp418kW |
| Torque | 480Nm354lb-ft | 540Nm398lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,590kg3,505lb | 1,455kg3,208lb |
| Gross weight | 1,755kg3,869lb | 1,800kg3,968lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 55.7s99% target: 332 km/h / 206 mph Calculated | 56.0s99% target: 327 km/h / 203 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.7s | 3.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.0s Calculated | 10.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.5s Calculated | 3.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 19.6L/100 km12mpg US14.4mpg UK | 13.3L/100 km17.7mpg US21.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 21.4L/100 km11mpg US13.2mpg UK | 20.1L/100 km11.7mpg US14.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.3s Calculated | 11.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 352hp/t263kW/t160hp/1000 lb Calculated | 385hp/t287kW/t175hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 302Nm/t202lb-ft/ton Calculated | 371Nm/t248lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 372km231mi Calculated | 677km420mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,805cc293cu in | 5,204cc318cu in |
| Length | 4,505mm177in | 4,345mm171in |
| Width | 1,895mm75in | 1,900mm75in |
| Height | 1,265mm50in | 1,165mm46in |
| Wheelbase | 2,605mm103in | 2,560mm101in |
| Front track | 1,580mm62in | 1,622mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,570mm62in | 1,592mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 110mm4in | - |
| Trunk volume | - | 110L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 73L | 90L |
| CO2 emissions | 379g/km | 315g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lexus LFA 4.8 V10: Power / Torque
- Lamborghini Gallardo LP 560-4 5.2i V10: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LexusLFA4.8 V10 | 8,700 rpm | 7,000 rpm | 9,000 rpm |
| LamborghiniGallardo LP 560-45.2i V10 | 8,000 rpm | 6,500 rpm | 8,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LexusLFA4.8 V10 | LamborghiniGallardo LP 560-45.2i V10 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.5 s | 3.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.7 s | 3.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.0 s | 10.5 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 38.4 s | 44.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 5.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.5 s | 7.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.6 s | 9.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.3 s | 11.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 214 km/h 133 mph | 211 km/h 131 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLFA4.8 V10 | 560 hp 418 kW |
| LamborghiniGallardo LP 560-45.2i V10 | 560 hp 418 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLFA4.8 V10 | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft |
| LamborghiniGallardo LP 560-45.2i V10 | 540 Nm 398 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLFA4.8 V10 | 1,590 kg 3,505 lb |
| LamborghiniGallardo LP 560-45.2i V10 | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLFA4.8 V10 | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph |
| LamborghiniGallardo LP 560-45.2i V10 | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLFA4.8 V10 | 3.7 s |
| LamborghiniGallardo LP 560-45.2i V10 | 3.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lexus LFA 4.8 V10 and Lamborghini Gallardo LP 560-4 5.2i V10: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLFA4.8 V10 | 19.6 L/100 km 12.0 mpg US 14.4 mpg UK |
| LamborghiniGallardo LP 560-45.2i V10 | 13.3 L/100 km 17.7 mpg US 21.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lamborghini Gallardo LP 560-4 5.2i V10 and Lexus LFA 4.8 V10: 6.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLFA4.8 V10 | 352 hp/t 263 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp |
| LamborghiniGallardo LP 560-45.2i V10 | 385 hp/t 287 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLFA4.8 V10 | 372 km 231 mi |
| LamborghiniGallardo LP 560-45.2i V10 | 677 km 420 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LexusLFA4.8 V10 | 560 hp 418 kW | 3.7 s | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph |
| LamborghiniGallardo LP 560-45.2i V10 | 560 hp 418 kW | 3.9 s | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LexusLFA4.8 V10 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LamborghiniGallardo LP 560-45.2i V10 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LexusLFA4.8 V10 |
| 19.6 L/100 km 12.0 mpg US 14.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| LamborghiniGallardo LP 560-45.2i V10 |
| 13.3 L/100 km 17.7 mpg US 21.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Lamborghini Gallardo LP 560-4 5.2i V10 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LexusLFA4.8 V10 | 19.6 L/100 km 12.0 mpg US 14.4 mpg UK | 3.7 s |
| LamborghiniGallardo LP 560-45.2i V10 | 13.3 L/100 km 17.7 mpg US 21.2 mpg UK | 3.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LexusLFA4.8 V10 | 352 hp/t 263 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp | 19.6 L/100 km 12.0 mpg US 14.4 mpg UK |
| LamborghiniGallardo LP 560-45.2i V10 | 385 hp/t 287 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp | 13.3 L/100 km 17.7 mpg US 21.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LexusLFA4.8 V10 | LamborghiniGallardo LP 560-45.2i V10 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 560 hp 418 kW | 560 hp 418 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft | 540 Nm 398 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.7 s | 3.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,590 kg 3,505 lb | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 19.6 L/100 km 12.0 mpg US 14.4 mpg UK | 13.3 L/100 km 17.7 mpg US 21.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 372 km 231 mi | 677 km 420 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 379 g/km | 315 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 110 L 3.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 352 hp/t 263 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp | 385 hp/t 287 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lexus LFA 4.8 V10 | Lamborghini Gallardo LP 560-4 5.2i V10 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 19.6 L/100 km12 mpg US14.4 mpg UK | 13.3 L/100 km17.7 mpg US21.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 34.30 LC100 km | 23.28 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 55.20 LC100 mi | 37.46 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,940 L777 US gal647 UK gal | 1,995 L527 US gal439 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 5,145 LC/year | 3,491 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lexus LFA 4.8 V10
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Lamborghini Gallardo LP 560-4 5.2i V10
- Has 60 Nm more
- Is 135 kg lighter
- Uses 6.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 33 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 304 km (189 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 64 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























