Lamborghini Diablo
Car comparison
Lamborghini Diablo 6.0 i V12 48V GTvsMercedes-Benz CLK (C209) AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz CLK (C209)
AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8
- Most powerful582 hp434 kW
- Highest torque800 Nm590 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption19.1 L/100 km12.3 mpg US14.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK
- Largest trunk395 L
- Best overall score76/100
- Best performance score92/100
- Best economy score70/100
- Best practicality score42/100
Lamborghini Diablo 6.0 i V12 48V GT
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.7 s
- Fastest top speed338 km/h210 mph
- Lightest1,490 kg3,285 lb
- Best power-to-weight386 hp/t288 kW/t2.6 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | LamborghiniDiablo6.0 i V12 48V GT | Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 575hp429kW | 582hp434kW |
| Torque | 630Nm465lb-ft | 800Nm590lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,490kg3,285lb | 1,667kg3,675lb |
| Gross weight | 1,895kg4,178lb | 1,980kg4,365lb |
| Top speed | 338 km/h 210 mph | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 52.6s99% target: 335 km/h / 208 mph Calculated | 64.1s99% target: 332 km/h / 206 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.7s | 3.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 9.7s Calculated | 10.9s |
| 0-60 mph | 3.5s Calculated | 3.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 13.7L/100 km17.2mpg US20.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 38.2L/100 km6.2mpg US7.4mpg UK | 19.1L/100 km12.3mpg US14.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 17.5L/100 km13.4mpg US16.1mpg UK | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.2s Calculated | 11.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 386hp/t288kW/t175hp/1000 lb Calculated | 349hp/t260kW/t158hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 423Nm/t283lb-ft/ton Calculated | 480Nm/t321lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 672km417mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,992cc366cu in | 5,439cc332cu in |
| Length | 4,430mm174in | 4,650mm183in |
| Width | 2,040mm80in | 1,800mm71in |
| Height | 1,115mm44in | 1,360mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,650mm104in | 2,715mm107in |
| Front track | 1,650mm65in | - |
| Rear track | 1,670mm66in | - |
| Trunk volume | 140L | 395L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 100L | 92L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lamborghini Diablo 6.0 i V12 48V GT: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniDiablo6.0 i V12 48V GT | 7,300 rpm | 5,500 rpm | 7,550 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8 | 6,100 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 7,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LamborghiniDiablo6.0 i V12 48V GT | Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.5 s | 3.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.7 s | 3.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 9.7 s | 10.9 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 34.3 s | 43.7 s |
| Top speed | 338 km/h 210 mph | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 5.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.5 s | 7.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.6 s | 9.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.2 s | 11.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 217 km/h 135 mph | 207 km/h 129 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniDiablo6.0 i V12 48V GT | 575 hp 429 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8 | 582 hp 434 kW |
Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8 has 7 hp more than Lamborghini Diablo 6.0 i V12 48V GT.
The biggest power difference is between Lamborghini Diablo 6.0 i V12 48V GT and Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniDiablo6.0 i V12 48V GT | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8 | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniDiablo6.0 i V12 48V GT | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8 | 1,667 kg 3,675 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniDiablo6.0 i V12 48V GT | 338 km/h 210 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8 | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniDiablo6.0 i V12 48V GT | 3.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8 | 3.9 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8 has more power, Lamborghini Diablo 6.0 i V12 48V GT is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lamborghini Diablo 6.0 i V12 48V GT and Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8: 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniDiablo6.0 i V12 48V GT | 386 hp/t 288 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8 | 349 hp/t 260 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniDiablo6.0 i V12 48V GT | 575 hp 429 kW | 3.7 s | 338 km/h 210 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8 | 582 hp 434 kW | 3.9 s | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniDiablo6.0 i V12 48V GT |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LamborghiniDiablo6.0 i V12 48V GT | Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 575 hp 429 kW | 582 hp 434 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.7 s | 3.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 338 km/h 210 mph | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb | 1,667 kg 3,675 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 13.7 L/100 km 17.2 mpg US 20.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 672 km 417 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 140 L 4.9 cu ft | 395 L 13.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 386 hp/t 288 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp | 349 hp/t 260 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.7 L/100 km17.2 mpg US20.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 23.97 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 38.58 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,055 L543 US gal452 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,596 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lamborghini Diablo 6.0 i V12 48V GT
- Is 177 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 37 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8
- Has 7 hp more
- Has 170 Nm more
- Has 255 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























