Lamborghini Aventador SVJ Roadster
Car comparison
Lamborghini Aventador SVJ Roadster 6.5 V12vsMcLaren 765LT Spider 4.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMcLaren 765LT Spider
4.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
McLaren 765LT Spider 4.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.8 s
- Highest torque800 Nm590 lb-ft
- Lightest1,388 kg3,060 lb
- Best power-to-weight551 hp/t411 kW/t1.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption14.7 L/100 km16.0 mpg US19.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range490 km304 mi
- Best performance score96/100
- Best economy score67/100
Lamborghini Aventador SVJ Roadster 6.5 V12
- Fastest top speed351 km/h218 mph
- Most powerful770 hp574 kW
- Best overall score74/100
- Best practicality score32/100
Specification comparison
| Model | LamborghiniAventador SVJ Roadster6.5 V12 | McLaren765LT Spider4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 770hp574kW | 765hp570kW |
| Torque | 720Nm531lb-ft | 800Nm590lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,575kg3,472lb | 1,388kg3,060lb |
| Top speed | 351 km/h 218 mph | 330 km/h 205 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 67.8s99% target: 347 km/h / 216 mph Calculated | 35.4s99% target: 327 km/h / 203 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.9s | 2.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 8.8s | 7.2s |
| 0-60 mph | 2.8s Calculated | 2.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 17.9L/100 km13.1mpg US15.8mpg UK | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 16.8L/100 km14mpg US16.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.5s Calculated | 10.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 489hp/t365kW/t222hp/1000 lb Calculated | 551hp/t411kW/t250hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 457Nm/t306lb-ft/ton Calculated | 576Nm/t386lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 475km295mi Calculated | 490km304mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 6,498cc397cu in | 3,994cc244cu in |
| Length | 4,943mm195in | 4,600mm181in |
| Width | 2,098mm83in | - |
| Height | 1,136mm45in | 1,192mm47in |
| Wheelbase | 2,700mm106in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,720mm68in | 1,659mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,680mm66in | 1,617mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 115mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | - | 150L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 72L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lamborghini Aventador SVJ Roadster 6.5 V12: Power / Torque
- McLaren 765LT Spider 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador SVJ Roadster6.5 V12 | 8,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm | 8,750 rpm |
| McLaren765LT Spider4.0 V8 | 7,500 rpm | 5,500 rpm | 8,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LamborghiniAventador SVJ Roadster6.5 V12 | McLaren765LT Spider4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.8 s | 2.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 2.9 s | 2.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 8.8 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 32.4 s | 28.5 s |
| Top speed | 351 km/h 218 mph | 330 km/h 205 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.7 s | 1.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.6 s | 4.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.9 s | 6.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.9 s | 8.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.5 s | 10.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 219 km/h 136 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador SVJ Roadster6.5 V12 | 770 hp 574 kW |
| McLaren765LT Spider4.0 V8 | 765 hp 570 kW |
Lamborghini Aventador SVJ Roadster 6.5 V12 has 5 hp more than McLaren 765LT Spider 4.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between McLaren 765LT Spider 4.0 V8 and Lamborghini Aventador SVJ Roadster 6.5 V12: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador SVJ Roadster6.5 V12 | 720 Nm 531 lb-ft |
| McLaren765LT Spider4.0 V8 | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador SVJ Roadster6.5 V12 | 1,575 kg 3,472 lb |
| McLaren765LT Spider4.0 V8 | 1,388 kg 3,060 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador SVJ Roadster6.5 V12 | 351 km/h 218 mph |
| McLaren765LT Spider4.0 V8 | 330 km/h 205 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador SVJ Roadster6.5 V12 | 2.9 s |
| McLaren765LT Spider4.0 V8 | 2.8 s |
Although Lamborghini Aventador SVJ Roadster 6.5 V12 has more power, McLaren 765LT Spider 4.0 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between McLaren 765LT Spider 4.0 V8 and Lamborghini Aventador SVJ Roadster 6.5 V12: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador SVJ Roadster6.5 V12 | 17.9 L/100 km 13.1 mpg US 15.8 mpg UK |
| McLaren765LT Spider4.0 V8 | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between McLaren 765LT Spider 4.0 V8 and Lamborghini Aventador SVJ Roadster 6.5 V12: 3.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador SVJ Roadster6.5 V12 | 489 hp/t 365 kW/t 2.0 kg/hp |
| McLaren765LT Spider4.0 V8 | 551 hp/t 411 kW/t 1.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador SVJ Roadster6.5 V12 | 475 km 295 mi |
| McLaren765LT Spider4.0 V8 | 490 km 304 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador SVJ Roadster6.5 V12 | 770 hp 574 kW | 2.9 s | 351 km/h 218 mph |
| McLaren765LT Spider4.0 V8 | 765 hp 570 kW | 2.8 s | 330 km/h 205 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador SVJ Roadster6.5 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| McLaren765LT Spider4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador SVJ Roadster6.5 V12 |
| 17.9 L/100 km 13.1 mpg US 15.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| McLaren765LT Spider4.0 V8 |
| 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | ||||||
McLaren 765LT Spider 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador SVJ Roadster6.5 V12 | 17.9 L/100 km 13.1 mpg US 15.8 mpg UK | 2.9 s |
| McLaren765LT Spider4.0 V8 | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | 2.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador SVJ Roadster6.5 V12 | 489 hp/t 365 kW/t 2.0 kg/hp | 17.9 L/100 km 13.1 mpg US 15.8 mpg UK |
| McLaren765LT Spider4.0 V8 | 551 hp/t 411 kW/t 1.8 kg/hp | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LamborghiniAventador SVJ Roadster6.5 V12 | McLaren765LT Spider4.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 770 hp 574 kW | 765 hp 570 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 720 Nm 531 lb-ft | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 2.9 s | 2.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 351 km/h 218 mph | 330 km/h 205 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,575 kg 3,472 lb | 1,388 kg 3,060 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 17.9 L/100 km 13.1 mpg US 15.8 mpg UK | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 475 km 295 mi | 490 km 304 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 150 L 5.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 489 hp/t 365 kW/t 2.0 kg/hp | 551 hp/t 411 kW/t 1.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lamborghini Aventador SVJ Roadster 6.5 V12 | McLaren 765LT Spider 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 17.9 L/100 km13.1 mpg US15.8 mpg UK | 14.7 L/100 km16 mpg US19.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 31.32 LC100 km | 25.72 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 50.41 LC100 mi | 41.40 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,685 L709 US gal591 UK gal | 2,205 L582 US gal485 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,699 LC/year | 3,859 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lamborghini Aventador SVJ Roadster 6.5 V12
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 21 km/h (13 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
McLaren 765LT Spider 4.0 V8
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 187 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 3.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 62 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 15 km (9 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























