W Motors Fenyr SuperSport
Car comparison
W Motors Fenyr SuperSport 3.8vsLamborghini Aventador SVJ 6.5 V12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLamborghini Aventador SVJ
6.5 V12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
W Motors Fenyr SuperSport 3.8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.7 s
- Fastest top speed395 km/h245 mph
- Most powerful800 hp597 kW
- Highest torque980 Nm723 lb-ft
- Lightest1,350 kg2,976 lb
- Best power-to-weight593 hp/t442 kW/t1.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption13.5 L/100 km17.4 mpg US20.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption20.0 L/100 km11.8 mpg US14.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK
- Best overall score78/100
- Best performance score96/100
- Best economy score71/100
- Best practicality score39/100
Specification comparison
| Model | W MotorsFenyr SuperSport3.8 | LamborghiniAventador SVJ6.5 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 800hp597kW | 770hp574kW |
| Torque | 980Nm723lb-ft | 720Nm531lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,350kg2,976lb | 1,525kg3,362lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,050kg4,519lb |
| Top speed | 395 km/h 245 mph | 350 km/h 217 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 124.5s99% target: 391 km/h / 243 mph Calculated | 67.3s99% target: 347 km/h / 215 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.7s | 2.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 9.4s | 8.6s |
| 0-60 mph | 2.6s Calculated | 2.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK | 19.6L/100 km12mpg US14.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 20L/100 km11.8mpg US14.1mpg UK | 31L/100 km7.6mpg US9.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.5s Calculated | 10.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 593hp/t442kW/t269hp/1000 lb Calculated | 505hp/t377kW/t229hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 726Nm/t486lb-ft/ton Calculated | 472Nm/t316lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 434km269mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,800cc232cu in | 6,498cc397cu in |
| Length | 4,684mm184in | 4,943mm195in |
| Width | 1,983mm78in | 2,098mm83in |
| Height | 1,199mm47in | 1,136mm45in |
| Wheelbase | 2,625mm103in | 2,700mm106in |
| Front track | 1,667mm66in | 1,720mm68in |
| Rear track | 1,720mm68in | 1,680mm66in |
| Ground clearance | - | 115mm5in |
| Trunk volume | - | 140L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | - | 85L |
| CO2 emissions | 311g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- W Motors Fenyr SuperSport 3.8: Power / Torque
- Lamborghini Aventador SVJ 6.5 V12: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| W MotorsFenyr SuperSport3.8 | 7,100 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 7,350 rpm |
| LamborghiniAventador SVJ6.5 V12 | 8,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm | 8,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | W MotorsFenyr SuperSport3.8 | LamborghiniAventador SVJ6.5 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 9.2 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 30.9 s | 32.3 s |
| Top speed | 395 km/h 245 mph | 350 km/h 217 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.6 s | 1.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.4 s | 4.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.7 s | 6.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.8 s | 8.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.5 s | 10.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 213 km/h 133 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| W MotorsFenyr SuperSport3.8 | 800 hp 597 kW |
| LamborghiniAventador SVJ6.5 V12 | 770 hp 574 kW |
W Motors Fenyr SuperSport 3.8 has 30 hp more than Lamborghini Aventador SVJ 6.5 V12.
The biggest power difference is between Lamborghini Aventador SVJ 6.5 V12 and W Motors Fenyr SuperSport 3.8: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| W MotorsFenyr SuperSport3.8 | 980 Nm 723 lb-ft |
| LamborghiniAventador SVJ6.5 V12 | 720 Nm 531 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| W MotorsFenyr SuperSport3.8 | 1,350 kg 2,976 lb |
| LamborghiniAventador SVJ6.5 V12 | 1,525 kg 3,362 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| W MotorsFenyr SuperSport3.8 | 395 km/h 245 mph |
| LamborghiniAventador SVJ6.5 V12 | 350 km/h 217 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| W MotorsFenyr SuperSport3.8 | 2.7 s |
| LamborghiniAventador SVJ6.5 V12 | 2.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between W Motors Fenyr SuperSport 3.8 and Lamborghini Aventador SVJ 6.5 V12: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| W MotorsFenyr SuperSport3.8 | 13.5 L/100 km 17.4 mpg US 20.9 mpg UK |
| LamborghiniAventador SVJ6.5 V12 | 19.6 L/100 km 12.0 mpg US 14.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between W Motors Fenyr SuperSport 3.8 and Lamborghini Aventador SVJ 6.5 V12: 6.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| W MotorsFenyr SuperSport3.8 | 593 hp/t 442 kW/t 1.7 kg/hp |
| LamborghiniAventador SVJ6.5 V12 | 505 hp/t 377 kW/t 2.0 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| W MotorsFenyr SuperSport3.8 | 800 hp 597 kW | 2.7 s | 395 km/h 245 mph |
| LamborghiniAventador SVJ6.5 V12 | 770 hp 574 kW | 2.8 s | 350 km/h 217 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W MotorsFenyr SuperSport3.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LamborghiniAventador SVJ6.5 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W MotorsFenyr SuperSport3.8 |
| 13.5 L/100 km 17.4 mpg US 20.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| LamborghiniAventador SVJ6.5 V12 |
| 19.6 L/100 km 12.0 mpg US 14.4 mpg UK | ||||||
W Motors Fenyr SuperSport 3.8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| W MotorsFenyr SuperSport3.8 | 13.5 L/100 km 17.4 mpg US 20.9 mpg UK | 2.7 s |
| LamborghiniAventador SVJ6.5 V12 | 19.6 L/100 km 12.0 mpg US 14.4 mpg UK | 2.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| W MotorsFenyr SuperSport3.8 | 593 hp/t 442 kW/t 1.7 kg/hp | 13.5 L/100 km 17.4 mpg US 20.9 mpg UK |
| LamborghiniAventador SVJ6.5 V12 | 505 hp/t 377 kW/t 2.0 kg/hp | 19.6 L/100 km 12.0 mpg US 14.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | W MotorsFenyr SuperSport3.8 | LamborghiniAventador SVJ6.5 V12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 800 hp 597 kW | 770 hp 574 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 980 Nm 723 lb-ft | 720 Nm 531 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 2.7 s | 2.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 395 km/h 245 mph | 350 km/h 217 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,350 kg 2,976 lb | 1,525 kg 3,362 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.5 L/100 km 17.4 mpg US 20.9 mpg UK | 19.6 L/100 km 12.0 mpg US 14.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 434 km 269 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 311 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 140 L 4.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 593 hp/t 442 kW/t 1.7 kg/hp | 505 hp/t 377 kW/t 2.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | W Motors Fenyr SuperSport 3.8 | Lamborghini Aventador SVJ 6.5 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.5 L/100 km17.4 mpg US20.9 mpg UK | 19.6 L/100 km12 mpg US14.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 23.63 LC100 km | 34.30 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 38.02 LC100 mi | 55.20 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,025 L535 US gal445 UK gal | 2,940 L777 US gal647 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,544 LC/year | 5,145 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
W Motors Fenyr SuperSport 3.8
- Has 30 hp more
- Has 260 Nm more
- Is 175 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 45 km/h (28 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 6.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 88 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Lamborghini Aventador SVJ 6.5 V12
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























