Lamborghini Aventador S Roadster
Car comparison
Lamborghini Aventador S Roadster 6.5 V12vsMcLaren 765LT Spider 4.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMcLaren 765LT Spider
4.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
McLaren 765LT Spider 4.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.8 s
- Most powerful765 hp570 kW
- Highest torque800 Nm590 lb-ft
- Lightest1,388 kg3,060 lb
- Best power-to-weight551 hp/t411 kW/t1.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption14.7 L/100 km16.0 mpg US19.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption16.8 L/100 km14.0 mpg US16.8 mpg UK
- Largest trunk150 L
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score96/100
- Best economy score67/100
- Best practicality score27/100
Lamborghini Aventador S Roadster 6.5 V12
- Fastest top speed350 km/h217 mph
- Lowest highway consumption11.6 L/100 km20.3 mpg US24.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range503 km313 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | LamborghiniAventador S Roadster6.5 V12 | McLaren765LT Spider4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 740hp552kW | 765hp570kW |
| Torque | 690Nm509lb-ft | 800Nm590lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,625kg3,583lb | 1,388kg3,060lb |
| Top speed | 350 km/h 217 mph | 330 km/h 205 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 67.4s99% target: 347 km/h / 215 mph Calculated | 35.4s99% target: 327 km/h / 203 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.0s | 2.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 9.0s | 7.2s |
| 0-60 mph | 2.9s Calculated | 2.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 16.9L/100 km13.9mpg US16.7mpg UK | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 26.2L/100 km9mpg US10.8mpg UK | 16.8L/100 km14mpg US16.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK | 13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.6s Calculated | 10.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 455hp/t340kW/t207hp/1000 lb Calculated | 551hp/t411kW/t250hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 425Nm/t284lb-ft/ton Calculated | 576Nm/t386lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 503km313mi Calculated | 490km304mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 6,498cc397cu in | 3,994cc244cu in |
| Length | 4,797mm189in | 4,600mm181in |
| Width | 2,030mm80in | 2,065mm81in |
| Height | 1,136mm45in | 1,192mm47in |
| Wheelbase | 2,700mm106in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,720mm68in | 1,659mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,680mm66in | 1,617mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 115mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 140L | 150L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 72L |
| CO2 emissions | 394g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lamborghini Aventador S Roadster 6.5 V12: Power / Torque
- McLaren 765LT Spider 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador S Roadster6.5 V12 | 8,400 rpm | 5,500 rpm | 8,650 rpm |
| McLaren765LT Spider4.0 V8 | 7,500 rpm | 5,500 rpm | 8,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LamborghiniAventador S Roadster6.5 V12 | McLaren765LT Spider4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.9 s | 2.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.0 s | 2.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 9.0 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 32.9 s | 28.5 s |
| Top speed | 350 km/h 217 mph | 330 km/h 205 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.7 s | 1.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.6 s | 4.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.0 s | 6.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.0 s | 8.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.6 s | 10.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 218 km/h 135 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador S Roadster6.5 V12 | 740 hp 552 kW |
| McLaren765LT Spider4.0 V8 | 765 hp 570 kW |
McLaren 765LT Spider 4.0 V8 has 25 hp more than Lamborghini Aventador S Roadster 6.5 V12.
The biggest power difference is between Lamborghini Aventador S Roadster 6.5 V12 and McLaren 765LT Spider 4.0 V8: 25 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador S Roadster6.5 V12 | 690 Nm 509 lb-ft |
| McLaren765LT Spider4.0 V8 | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador S Roadster6.5 V12 | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb |
| McLaren765LT Spider4.0 V8 | 1,388 kg 3,060 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador S Roadster6.5 V12 | 350 km/h 217 mph |
| McLaren765LT Spider4.0 V8 | 330 km/h 205 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador S Roadster6.5 V12 | 3.0 s |
| McLaren765LT Spider4.0 V8 | 2.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between McLaren 765LT Spider 4.0 V8 and Lamborghini Aventador S Roadster 6.5 V12: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador S Roadster6.5 V12 | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK |
| McLaren765LT Spider4.0 V8 | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between McLaren 765LT Spider 4.0 V8 and Lamborghini Aventador S Roadster 6.5 V12: 2.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador S Roadster6.5 V12 | 455 hp/t 340 kW/t 2.2 kg/hp |
| McLaren765LT Spider4.0 V8 | 551 hp/t 411 kW/t 1.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador S Roadster6.5 V12 | 503 km 313 mi |
| McLaren765LT Spider4.0 V8 | 490 km 304 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador S Roadster6.5 V12 | 740 hp 552 kW | 3.0 s | 350 km/h 217 mph |
| McLaren765LT Spider4.0 V8 | 765 hp 570 kW | 2.8 s | 330 km/h 205 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador S Roadster6.5 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| McLaren765LT Spider4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador S Roadster6.5 V12 |
| 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| McLaren765LT Spider4.0 V8 |
| 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | ||||||
McLaren 765LT Spider 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador S Roadster6.5 V12 | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK | 3.0 s |
| McLaren765LT Spider4.0 V8 | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | 2.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador S Roadster6.5 V12 | 455 hp/t 340 kW/t 2.2 kg/hp | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK |
| McLaren765LT Spider4.0 V8 | 551 hp/t 411 kW/t 1.8 kg/hp | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LamborghiniAventador S Roadster6.5 V12 | McLaren765LT Spider4.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 740 hp 552 kW | 765 hp 570 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 690 Nm 509 lb-ft | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.0 s | 2.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 350 km/h 217 mph | 330 km/h 205 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb | 1,388 kg 3,060 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 503 km 313 mi | 490 km 304 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 394 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 140 L 4.9 cu ft | 150 L 5.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 455 hp/t 340 kW/t 2.2 kg/hp | 551 hp/t 411 kW/t 1.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lamborghini Aventador S Roadster 6.5 V12 | McLaren 765LT Spider 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 16.9 L/100 km13.9 mpg US16.7 mpg UK | 14.7 L/100 km16 mpg US19.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 29.57 LC100 km | 25.72 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 47.60 LC100 mi | 41.40 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,535 L670 US gal558 UK gal | 2,205 L582 US gal485 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,436 LC/year | 3,859 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lamborghini Aventador S Roadster 6.5 V12
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 13 km (8 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
McLaren 765LT Spider 4.0 V8
- Has 25 hp more
- Has 110 Nm more
- Is 237 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 96 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 10 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























