Lamborghini Aventador S Roadster
Car comparison
Lamborghini Aventador S Roadster 6.5 V12vsMcLaren 750S Spider 4.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMcLaren 750S Spider
4.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
McLaren 750S Spider 4.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.8 s
- Most powerful750 hp559 kW
- Highest torque800 Nm590 lb-ft
- Lightest1,438 kg3,170 lb
- Best power-to-weight522 hp/t389 kW/t1.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.2 L/100 km19.3 mpg US23.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range590 km367 mi
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score95/100
- Best economy score74/100
Lamborghini Aventador S Roadster 6.5 V12
- Fastest top speed350 km/h217 mph
- Largest trunk140 L
- Best practicality score26/100
Specification comparison
| Model | LamborghiniAventador S Roadster6.5 V12 | McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 740hp552kW | 750hp559kW |
| Torque | 690Nm509lb-ft | 800Nm590lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,625kg3,583lb | 1,438kg3,170lb |
| Top speed | 350 km/h 217 mph | 332 km/h 206 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 67.4s99% target: 347 km/h / 215 mph Calculated | 37.3s99% target: 329 km/h / 204 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.0s | 2.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 9.0s | 7.3s |
| 0-60 mph | 2.9s Calculated | 2.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 16.9L/100 km13.9mpg US16.7mpg UK | 12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 26.2L/100 km9mpg US10.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 10.6s Calculated | 10.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 455hp/t340kW/t207hp/1000 lb Calculated | 522hp/t389kW/t237hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 425Nm/t284lb-ft/ton Calculated | 556Nm/t372lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 503km313mi Calculated | 590km367mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 6,498cc397cu in | 3,994cc244cu in |
| Length | 4,797mm189in | 4,569mm180in |
| Width | 2,030mm80in | 1,930mm76in |
| Height | 1,136mm45in | 1,196mm47in |
| Wheelbase | 2,700mm106in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,720mm68in | 1,680mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,680mm66in | 1,629mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 115mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 140L | 58L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 72L |
| CO2 emissions | 394g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lamborghini Aventador S Roadster 6.5 V12: Power / Torque
- McLaren 750S Spider 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador S Roadster6.5 V12 | 8,400 rpm | 5,500 rpm | 8,650 rpm |
| McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8 | 7,500 rpm | 5,500 rpm | 7,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LamborghiniAventador S Roadster6.5 V12 | McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.9 s | 2.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.0 s | 2.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 9.0 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 32.9 s | 28.1 s |
| Top speed | 350 km/h 217 mph | 332 km/h 206 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.7 s | 1.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.6 s | 4.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.0 s | 6.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.0 s | 8.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.6 s | 10.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 218 km/h 135 mph | 238 km/h 148 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador S Roadster6.5 V12 | 740 hp 552 kW |
| McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8 | 750 hp 559 kW |
McLaren 750S Spider 4.0 V8 has 10 hp more than Lamborghini Aventador S Roadster 6.5 V12.
The biggest power difference is between Lamborghini Aventador S Roadster 6.5 V12 and McLaren 750S Spider 4.0 V8: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador S Roadster6.5 V12 | 690 Nm 509 lb-ft |
| McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8 | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador S Roadster6.5 V12 | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb |
| McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8 | 1,438 kg 3,170 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador S Roadster6.5 V12 | 350 km/h 217 mph |
| McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8 | 332 km/h 206 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador S Roadster6.5 V12 | 3.0 s |
| McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8 | 2.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between McLaren 750S Spider 4.0 V8 and Lamborghini Aventador S Roadster 6.5 V12: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador S Roadster6.5 V12 | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK |
| McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8 | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between McLaren 750S Spider 4.0 V8 and Lamborghini Aventador S Roadster 6.5 V12: 4.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador S Roadster6.5 V12 | 455 hp/t 340 kW/t 2.2 kg/hp |
| McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8 | 522 hp/t 389 kW/t 1.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador S Roadster6.5 V12 | 503 km 313 mi |
| McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8 | 590 km 367 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador S Roadster6.5 V12 | 740 hp 552 kW | 3.0 s | 350 km/h 217 mph |
| McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8 | 750 hp 559 kW | 2.8 s | 332 km/h 206 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador S Roadster6.5 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador S Roadster6.5 V12 |
| 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8 |
| 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK | ||||||
McLaren 750S Spider 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador S Roadster6.5 V12 | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK | 3.0 s |
| McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8 | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK | 2.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador S Roadster6.5 V12 | 455 hp/t 340 kW/t 2.2 kg/hp | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK |
| McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8 | 522 hp/t 389 kW/t 1.9 kg/hp | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LamborghiniAventador S Roadster6.5 V12 | McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 740 hp 552 kW | 750 hp 559 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 690 Nm 509 lb-ft | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.0 s | 2.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 350 km/h 217 mph | 332 km/h 206 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb | 1,438 kg 3,170 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 503 km 313 mi | 590 km 367 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 394 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 140 L 4.9 cu ft | 58 L 2.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 455 hp/t 340 kW/t 2.2 kg/hp | 522 hp/t 389 kW/t 1.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lamborghini Aventador S Roadster 6.5 V12 | McLaren 750S Spider 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 16.9 L/100 km13.9 mpg US16.7 mpg UK | 12.2 L/100 km19.3 mpg US23.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 29.57 LC100 km | 21.35 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 47.60 LC100 mi | 34.36 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,535 L670 US gal558 UK gal | 1,830 L483 US gal403 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,436 LC/year | 3,203 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lamborghini Aventador S Roadster 6.5 V12
- Has 18 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Has 82 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
McLaren 750S Spider 4.0 V8
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 110 Nm more
- Is 187 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 4.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 66 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 87 km (54 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























