Lamborghini Aventador S Roadster
Car comparison
Lamborghini Aventador S Roadster 6.5 V12vsMcLaren 675LT Spider 3.8 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMcLaren 675LT Spider
3.8 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
McLaren 675LT Spider 3.8 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.9 s
- Highest torque700 Nm516 lb-ft
- Lightest1,368 kg3,016 lb
- Best power-to-weight493 hp/t368 kW/t2.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption17.8 L/100 km13.2 mpg US15.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions275 g/km
- Best estimated range615 km382 mi
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score95/100
- Best economy score75/100
- Best practicality score29/100
Lamborghini Aventador S Roadster 6.5 V12
- Fastest top speed350 km/h217 mph
- Most powerful740 hp552 kW
Specification comparison
| Model | LamborghiniAventador S Roadster6.5 V12 | McLaren675LT Spider3.8 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 740hp552kW | 675hp503kW |
| Torque | 690Nm509lb-ft | 700Nm516lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,625kg3,583lb | 1,368kg3,016lb |
| Top speed | 350 km/h 217 mph | 326 km/h 203 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 67.4s99% target: 347 km/h / 215 mph Calculated | 44.3s99% target: 323 km/h / 201 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.0s | 2.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 9.0s | 8.1s |
| 0-60 mph | 2.9s Calculated | 2.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 16.9L/100 km13.9mpg US16.7mpg UK | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 26.2L/100 km9mpg US10.8mpg UK | 17.8L/100 km13.2mpg US15.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.6s Calculated | 10.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 455hp/t340kW/t207hp/1000 lb Calculated | 493hp/t368kW/t224hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 425Nm/t284lb-ft/ton Calculated | 512Nm/t342lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 503km313mi Calculated | 615km382mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 6,498cc397cu in | 3,799cc232cu in |
| Length | 4,797mm189in | 4,546mm179in |
| Width | 2,030mm80in | - |
| Height | 1,136mm45in | - |
| Wheelbase | 2,700mm106in | - |
| Front track | 1,720mm68in | - |
| Rear track | 1,680mm66in | - |
| Ground clearance | 115mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 140L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 72L |
| CO2 emissions | 394g/km | 275g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lamborghini Aventador S Roadster 6.5 V12: Power / Torque
- McLaren 675LT Spider 3.8 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador S Roadster6.5 V12 | 8,400 rpm | 5,500 rpm | 8,650 rpm |
| McLaren675LT Spider3.8 V8 | 7,100 rpm | 5,000-6,500 rpm | 7,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LamborghiniAventador S Roadster6.5 V12 | McLaren675LT Spider3.8 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.9 s | 2.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.0 s | 2.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 9.0 s | 8.1 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 32.9 s | 41.9 s |
| Top speed | 350 km/h 217 mph | 326 km/h 203 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.7 s | 1.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.6 s | 4.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.0 s | 6.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.0 s | 8.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.6 s | 10.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 218 km/h 135 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador S Roadster6.5 V12 | 740 hp 552 kW |
| McLaren675LT Spider3.8 V8 | 675 hp 503 kW |
Lamborghini Aventador S Roadster 6.5 V12 has 65 hp more than McLaren 675LT Spider 3.8 V8.
The biggest power difference is between McLaren 675LT Spider 3.8 V8 and Lamborghini Aventador S Roadster 6.5 V12: 65 hp (48 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador S Roadster6.5 V12 | 690 Nm 509 lb-ft |
| McLaren675LT Spider3.8 V8 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador S Roadster6.5 V12 | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb |
| McLaren675LT Spider3.8 V8 | 1,368 kg 3,016 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador S Roadster6.5 V12 | 350 km/h 217 mph |
| McLaren675LT Spider3.8 V8 | 326 km/h 203 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador S Roadster6.5 V12 | 3.0 s |
| McLaren675LT Spider3.8 V8 | 2.9 s |
Although Lamborghini Aventador S Roadster 6.5 V12 has more power, McLaren 675LT Spider 3.8 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between McLaren 675LT Spider 3.8 V8 and Lamborghini Aventador S Roadster 6.5 V12: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador S Roadster6.5 V12 | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK |
| McLaren675LT Spider3.8 V8 | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between McLaren 675LT Spider 3.8 V8 and Lamborghini Aventador S Roadster 6.5 V12: 5.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador S Roadster6.5 V12 | 455 hp/t 340 kW/t 2.2 kg/hp |
| McLaren675LT Spider3.8 V8 | 493 hp/t 368 kW/t 2.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador S Roadster6.5 V12 | 503 km 313 mi |
| McLaren675LT Spider3.8 V8 | 615 km 382 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador S Roadster6.5 V12 | 740 hp 552 kW | 3.0 s | 350 km/h 217 mph |
| McLaren675LT Spider3.8 V8 | 675 hp 503 kW | 2.9 s | 326 km/h 203 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador S Roadster6.5 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| McLaren675LT Spider3.8 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador S Roadster6.5 V12 |
| 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| McLaren675LT Spider3.8 V8 |
| 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | ||||||
McLaren 675LT Spider 3.8 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador S Roadster6.5 V12 | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK | 3.0 s |
| McLaren675LT Spider3.8 V8 | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | 2.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador S Roadster6.5 V12 | 455 hp/t 340 kW/t 2.2 kg/hp | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK |
| McLaren675LT Spider3.8 V8 | 493 hp/t 368 kW/t 2.0 kg/hp | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LamborghiniAventador S Roadster6.5 V12 | McLaren675LT Spider3.8 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 740 hp 552 kW | 675 hp 503 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 690 Nm 509 lb-ft | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.0 s | 2.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 350 km/h 217 mph | 326 km/h 203 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb | 1,368 kg 3,016 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 503 km 313 mi | 615 km 382 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 394 g/km | 275 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 140 L 4.9 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 455 hp/t 340 kW/t 2.2 kg/hp | 493 hp/t 368 kW/t 2.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lamborghini Aventador S Roadster 6.5 V12 | McLaren 675LT Spider 3.8 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 16.9 L/100 km13.9 mpg US16.7 mpg UK | 11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 29.57 LC100 km | 20.47 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 47.60 LC100 mi | 32.95 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,535 L670 US gal558 UK gal | 1,755 L464 US gal386 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,436 LC/year | 3,071 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lamborghini Aventador S Roadster 6.5 V12
- Has 65 hp more
- Has 24 km/h (15 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
McLaren 675LT Spider 3.8 V8
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 257 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 5.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 38 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 112 km (70 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 119 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























