Lamborghini Aventador S Coupe
Car comparison
Lamborghini Aventador S Coupe 6.5 V12vsLamborghini Huracan EVO · Facelift 2019 5.2 V10
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLamborghini Huracan EVO · Facelift 2019
5.2 V10
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lamborghini Aventador S Coupe 6.5 V12
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.9 s
- Fastest top speed350 km/h217 mph
- Most powerful740 hp552 kW
- Highest torque690 Nm509 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight470 hp/t350 kW/t2.1 kg/hp
- Best overall score76/100
- Best performance score94/100
- Best practicality score39/100
Lamborghini Huracan EVO Facelift 2019 5.2 V10
- Lightest1,422 kg3,135 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption13.7 L/100 km17.2 mpg US20.6 mpg UK
- Best economy score70/100
Specification comparison
| Model | LamborghiniAventador S Coupe6.5 V12 | LamborghiniHuracan EVOFacelift 20195.2 V10 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 740hp552kW | 640hp477kW |
| Torque | 690Nm509lb-ft | 600Nm443lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,575kg3,472lb | 1,422kg3,135lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,000kg4,409lb |
| Top speed | 350 km/h 217 mph | Unrestricted 340 km/h211 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 67.3s99% target: 347 km/h / 215 mph Calculated | 66.1s99% target: 337 km/h / 209 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.9s | 2.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 8.8s | 9.0s |
| 0-60 mph | 2.8s Calculated | 2.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 16.9L/100 km13.9mpg US16.7mpg UK | 13.7L/100 km17.2mpg US20.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 26.2L/100 km9mpg US10.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 10.5s Calculated | 10.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 470hp/t350kW/t213hp/1000 lb Calculated | 450hp/t336kW/t204hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 438Nm/t293lb-ft/ton Calculated | 422Nm/t282lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 606km376mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 6,498cc397cu in | 5,204cc318cu in |
| Length | 4,797mm189in | 4,520mm178in |
| Width | 2,030mm80in | 1,933mm76in |
| Height | 1,136mm45in | 1,165mm46in |
| Wheelbase | 2,700mm106in | 2,620mm103in |
| Front track | - | 1,668mm66in |
| Rear track | - | 1,620mm64in |
| Ground clearance | - | 122mm5in |
| Trunk volume | - | 100L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | - | 83L |
| CO2 emissions | 394g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lamborghini Aventador S Coupe 6.5 V12: Power / Torque
- Lamborghini Huracan EVO Facelift 2019 5.2 V10: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador S Coupe6.5 V12 | 8,400 rpm | 5,500 rpm | 8,650 rpm |
| LamborghiniHuracan EVOFacelift 20195.2 V10 | 8,000 rpm | 6,500 rpm | 8,700 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LamborghiniAventador S Coupe6.5 V12 | LamborghiniHuracan EVOFacelift 20195.2 V10 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 2.9 s | 2.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 8.8 s | 9.0 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 32.6 s | 38.3 s |
| Top speed | 350 km/h 217 mph | Unrestricted 340 km/h211 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.7 s | 1.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.6 s | 4.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.9 s | 8.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.5 s | 10.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 219 km/h 136 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador S Coupe6.5 V12 | 740 hp 552 kW |
| LamborghiniHuracan EVOFacelift 20195.2 V10 | 640 hp 477 kW |
Lamborghini Aventador S Coupe 6.5 V12 has 100 hp more than Lamborghini Huracan EVO Facelift 2019 5.2 V10.
The biggest power difference is between Lamborghini Huracan EVO Facelift 2019 5.2 V10 and Lamborghini Aventador S Coupe 6.5 V12: 100 hp (75 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador S Coupe6.5 V12 | 690 Nm 509 lb-ft |
| LamborghiniHuracan EVOFacelift 20195.2 V10 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador S Coupe6.5 V12 | 1,575 kg 3,472 lb |
| LamborghiniHuracan EVOFacelift 20195.2 V10 | 1,422 kg 3,135 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador S Coupe6.5 V12 | 350 km/h 217 mph |
| LamborghiniHuracan EVOFacelift 20195.2 V10 | Unrestricted 340 km/h211 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador S Coupe6.5 V12 | 2.9 s |
| LamborghiniHuracan EVOFacelift 20195.2 V10 | 2.9 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador S Coupe6.5 V12 | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK |
| LamborghiniHuracan EVOFacelift 20195.2 V10 | 13.7 L/100 km 17.2 mpg US 20.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lamborghini Huracan EVO Facelift 2019 5.2 V10 and Lamborghini Aventador S Coupe 6.5 V12: 3.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador S Coupe6.5 V12 | 470 hp/t 350 kW/t 2.1 kg/hp |
| LamborghiniHuracan EVOFacelift 20195.2 V10 | 450 hp/t 336 kW/t 2.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador S Coupe6.5 V12 | 740 hp 552 kW | 2.9 s | 350 km/h 217 mph |
| LamborghiniHuracan EVOFacelift 20195.2 V10 | 640 hp 477 kW | 2.9 s | Unrestricted 340 km/h211 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador S Coupe6.5 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LamborghiniHuracan EVOFacelift 20195.2 V10 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador S Coupe6.5 V12 |
| 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| LamborghiniHuracan EVOFacelift 20195.2 V10 |
| 13.7 L/100 km 17.2 mpg US 20.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Lamborghini Huracan EVO Facelift 2019 5.2 V10 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador S Coupe6.5 V12 | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK | 2.9 s |
| LamborghiniHuracan EVOFacelift 20195.2 V10 | 13.7 L/100 km 17.2 mpg US 20.6 mpg UK | 2.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniAventador S Coupe6.5 V12 | 470 hp/t 350 kW/t 2.1 kg/hp | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK |
| LamborghiniHuracan EVOFacelift 20195.2 V10 | 450 hp/t 336 kW/t 2.2 kg/hp | 13.7 L/100 km 17.2 mpg US 20.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LamborghiniAventador S Coupe6.5 V12 | LamborghiniHuracan EVOFacelift 20195.2 V10 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 740 hp 552 kW | 640 hp 477 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 690 Nm 509 lb-ft | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 2.9 s | 2.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 350 km/h 217 mph | Unrestricted 340 km/h211 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,575 kg 3,472 lb | 1,422 kg 3,135 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK | 13.7 L/100 km 17.2 mpg US 20.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 606 km 376 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 394 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 100 L 3.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 470 hp/t 350 kW/t 2.1 kg/hp | 450 hp/t 336 kW/t 2.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lamborghini Aventador S Coupe 6.5 V12 | Lamborghini Huracan EVO Facelift 2019 5.2 V10 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 16.9 L/100 km13.9 mpg US16.7 mpg UK | 13.7 L/100 km17.2 mpg US20.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 29.57 LC100 km | 23.97 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 47.60 LC100 mi | 38.58 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,535 L670 US gal558 UK gal | 2,055 L543 US gal452 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,436 LC/year | 3,596 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lamborghini Aventador S Coupe 6.5 V12
- Has 100 hp more
- Has 90 Nm more
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Lamborghini Huracan EVO Facelift 2019 5.2 V10
- Is 153 kg lighter
- Uses 3.2 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























