Lamborghini 400 GT 2+2
Car comparison
Lamborghini 400 GT 2+2 3.9 V12vsPorsche Cayman (987C) · Facelift 2009 S 3.4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche Cayman (987C) · Facelift 2009
S 3.4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lamborghini 400 GT 2+2 3.9 V12
- Fastest top speed285 km/h177 mph Unrestricted270 km/h168 mph Restricted
- Most powerful320 hp239 kW
- Highest torque374 Nm276 lb-ft
- Lightest1,300 kg2,866 lb
- Best power-to-weight246 hp/t184 kW/t4.1 kg/hp
- Largest trunk330 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best practicality score48/100
Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 S 3.4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.2 s
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.8 L/100 km24.0 mpg US28.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range663 km412 mi
- Best performance score70/100
- Best economy score81/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Lamborghini400 GT 2+23.9 V12 | PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 320hp239kW | 320hp239kW |
| Torque | 374Nm276lb-ft | 370Nm273lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,300kg2,866lb | 1,350kg2,976lb |
| Gross weight | 1,670kg3,682lb | 1,645kg3,627lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Calculated | 277 km/h 172 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.3s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated | 82.7s99% target: 274 km/h / 170 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.2s | 5.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.9s Calculated | 18.1s |
| 0-60 mph | 5.9s Calculated | 4.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 18L/100 km13.1mpg US15.7mpg UK | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 14.4L/100 km16.3mpg US19.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.1s Calculated | 13.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 246hp/t184kW/t112hp/1000 lb Calculated | 237hp/t177kW/t108hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 288Nm/t192lb-ft/ton Calculated | 274Nm/t183lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 483km300mi Calculated | 663km412mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,929cc240cu in | 3,436cc210cu in |
| Length | 4,460mm176in | 4,347mm171in |
| Width | 1,730mm68in | 1,801mm71in |
| Height | 1,285mm51in | 1,306mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,550mm100in | 2,415mm95in |
| Front track | 1,380mm54in | 1,486mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,380mm54in | 1,528mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 127mm5in | 126mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 330L | 260L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 87L | 65L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 230g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lamborghini 400 GT 2+2 3.9 V12: Power / Torque
- Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 S 3.4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lamborghini400 GT 2+23.9 V12 | 6,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 7,200 rpm | 4,750 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Lamborghini400 GT 2+23.9 V12 | PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.9 s | 4.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.2 s | 5.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.9 s | 18.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Likely limited | 277 km/h 172 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 8.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 11.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.1 s | 13.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 172 km/h 107 mph | 174 km/h 108 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lamborghini400 GT 2+23.9 V12 | 320 hp 239 kW |
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 320 hp 239 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lamborghini400 GT 2+23.9 V12 | 374 Nm 276 lb-ft |
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lamborghini400 GT 2+23.9 V12 | 1,300 kg 2,866 lb |
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 1,350 kg 2,976 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lamborghini400 GT 2+23.9 V12 | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 277 km/h 172 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lamborghini400 GT 2+23.9 V12 | 6.2 s |
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 5.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 S 3.4 and Lamborghini 400 GT 2+2 3.9 V12: 1.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lamborghini400 GT 2+23.9 V12 | 18.0 L/100 km 13.1 mpg US 15.7 mpg UK |
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 S 3.4 and Lamborghini 400 GT 2+2 3.9 V12: 8.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lamborghini400 GT 2+23.9 V12 | 246 hp/t 184 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 237 hp/t 177 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lamborghini400 GT 2+23.9 V12 | 483 km 300 mi |
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 663 km 412 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lamborghini400 GT 2+23.9 V12 | 320 hp 239 kW | 6.2 s | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 320 hp 239 kW | 5.2 s | 277 km/h 172 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lamborghini400 GT 2+23.9 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lamborghini400 GT 2+23.9 V12 |
| 18.0 L/100 km 13.1 mpg US 15.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4 |
| 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 S 3.4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Lamborghini400 GT 2+23.9 V12 | 18.0 L/100 km 13.1 mpg US 15.7 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Lamborghini400 GT 2+23.9 V12 | 246 hp/t 184 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 18.0 L/100 km 13.1 mpg US 15.7 mpg UK |
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 237 hp/t 177 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Lamborghini400 GT 2+23.9 V12 | PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 320 hp 239 kW | 320 hp 239 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 374 Nm 276 lb-ft | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.2 s | 5.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph | 277 km/h 172 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,300 kg 2,866 lb | 1,350 kg 2,976 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 18.0 L/100 km 13.1 mpg US 15.7 mpg UK | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 483 km 300 mi | 663 km 412 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 230 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 330 L 11.7 cu ft | 260 L 9.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 246 hp/t 184 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 237 hp/t 177 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lamborghini 400 GT 2+2 3.9 V12 | Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 S 3.4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 18 L/100 km13.1 mpg US15.7 mpg UK | 9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 31.50 LC100 km | 17.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 50.69 LC100 mi | 27.60 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,700 L713 US gal594 UK gal | 1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,725 LC/year | 2,573 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lamborghini 400 GT 2+2 3.9 V12
- Has 4 Nm more
- Is 50 kg lighter
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 70 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 S 3.4
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 8.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 180 km (112 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























