Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) · Facelift 2017 Cup 250 1.8vsKTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonKTM X-Bow GT
2.0 Turbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.1 s
- Most powerful285 hp213 kW
- Highest torque420 Nm310 lb-ft
- Lightest847 kg1,867 lb
- Best power-to-weight336 hp/t251 kW/t3.0 kg/hp
- Best overall score55/100
- Best performance score68/100
Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) Facelift 2017 Cup 250 1.8
- Fastest top speed248 km/h154 mph
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range640 km398 mi
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score30/100
Specification comparison
| Model | LotusElise (SERIES 3)Facelift 2017Cup 250 1.8 | KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 246hp183kW | 285hp213kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 420Nm310lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 917kg2,022lb | 847kg1,867lb |
| Top speed | 248 km/h 154 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 43.2s99% target: 246 km/h / 153 mph Calculated | 43.1s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.3s | 4.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.6s Calculated | 17.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.1s Calculated | 3.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 12.3s Calculated | 12.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 268hp/t200kW/t122hp/1000 lb Calculated | 336hp/t251kW/t153hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 273Nm/t182lb-ft/ton Calculated | 496Nm/t332lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 640km398mi Calculated | 482km299mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,798cc110cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 3,824mm151in | 3,738mm147in |
| Width | 1,719mm68in | 1,915mm75in |
| Height | 1,117mm44in | 1,202mm47in |
| Wheelbase | - | 2,430mm96in |
| Front track | - | 1,672mm66in |
| Rear track | - | 1,626mm64in |
| Doors | 2 | - |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 48L | 40L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 189g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) Facelift 2017 Cup 250 1.8: Power / Torque
- KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Facelift 2017Cup 250 1.8 | 7,200 rpm | 3,500-5,500 rpm | 7,450 rpm |
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo | 6,400 rpm | 3,200 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LotusElise (SERIES 3)Facelift 2017Cup 250 1.8 | KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.1 s | 3.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.3 s | 4.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.6 s | 17.0 s |
| Top speed | 248 km/h 154 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.1 s | 8.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.4 s | 10.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.3 s | 12.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 187 km/h 116 mph | 180 km/h 112 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Facelift 2017Cup 250 1.8 | 246 hp 183 kW |
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo | 285 hp 213 kW |
KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo has 39 hp more than Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) Facelift 2017 Cup 250 1.8.
The biggest power difference is between Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) Facelift 2017 Cup 250 1.8 and KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo: 39 hp (29 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Facelift 2017Cup 250 1.8 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Facelift 2017Cup 250 1.8 | 917 kg 2,022 lb |
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo | 847 kg 1,867 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Facelift 2017Cup 250 1.8 | 248 km/h 154 mph |
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo | 231 km/h 144 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Facelift 2017Cup 250 1.8 | 4.3 s |
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo | 4.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo and Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) Facelift 2017 Cup 250 1.8: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Facelift 2017Cup 250 1.8 | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) Facelift 2017 Cup 250 1.8 and KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Facelift 2017Cup 250 1.8 | 268 hp/t 200 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo | 336 hp/t 251 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Facelift 2017Cup 250 1.8 | 640 km 398 mi |
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo | 482 km 299 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Facelift 2017Cup 250 1.8 | 246 hp 183 kW | 4.3 s | 248 km/h 154 mph |
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo | 285 hp 213 kW | 4.1 s | 231 km/h 144 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Facelift 2017Cup 250 1.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Facelift 2017Cup 250 1.8 |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo |
| 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||
KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Facelift 2017Cup 250 1.8 | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 4.3 s |
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 4.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Facelift 2017Cup 250 1.8 | 268 hp/t 200 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo | 336 hp/t 251 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LotusElise (SERIES 3)Facelift 2017Cup 250 1.8 | KTMX-Bow GT2.0 Turbo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 246 hp 183 kW | 285 hp 213 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.3 s | 4.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 248 km/h 154 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 917 kg 2,022 lb | 847 kg 1,867 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 640 km 398 mi | 482 km 299 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 189 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 268 hp/t 200 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 336 hp/t 251 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) Facelift 2017 Cup 250 1.8 | KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK | 8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.13 LC100 km | 14.53 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi | 23.38 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal | 1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,969 LC/year | 2,179 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) Facelift 2017 Cup 250 1.8
- Has 17 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 158 km (98 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
KTM X-Bow GT 2.0 Turbo
- Has 39 hp more
- Has 170 Nm more
- Is 70 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 68 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























