Koenigsegg CCX
Car comparison
Koenigsegg CCX R 4.7 V8vsLamborghini Reventon 6.5 V12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLamborghini Reventon
6.5 V12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Koenigsegg CCX R 4.7 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.1 s
- Fastest top speed400 km/h249 mph
- Most powerful1,032 hp770 kW
- Highest torque1,060 Nm782 lb-ft
- Lightest1,280 kg2,822 lb
- Best power-to-weight806 hp/t601 kW/t1.2 kg/hp
- Best overall score76/100
- Best performance score96/100
Lamborghini Reventon 6.5 V12
- Lowest combined fuel consumption21.3 L/100 km11.0 mpg US13.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption15.0 L/100 km15.7 mpg US18.8 mpg UK
- Best economy score50/100
- Best practicality score38/100
Specification comparison
| Model | KoenigseggCCXR 4.7 V8 | LamborghiniReventon6.5 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,032hp770kW | 640hp477kW |
| Torque | 1,060Nm782lb-ft | 660Nm487lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,280kg2,822lb | 1,665kg3,671lb |
| Top speed | 400 km/h 249 mph | 340 km/h 211 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 86.2s99% target: 396 km/h / 246 mph Calculated | 50.0s99% target: 337 km/h / 209 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.1s | 3.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 8.9s | 9.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.0s Calculated | 3.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 22L/100 km10.7mpg US12.8mpg UK | 21.3L/100 km11mpg US13.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 32.3L/100 km7.3mpg US8.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 18L/100 km13.1mpg US15.7mpg UK | 15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.7s Calculated | 10.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 806hp/t601kW/t366hp/1000 lb Calculated | 384hp/t287kW/t174hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 828Nm/t554lb-ft/ton Calculated | 396Nm/t265lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 318km198mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 4,700cc287cu in | 6,496cc396cu in |
| Length | 4,293mm169in | 4,700mm185in |
| Width | 1,996mm79in | 2,058mm81in |
| Height | 1,114mm44in | 1,135mm45in |
| Wheelbase | - | 2,665mm105in |
| Front track | - | 1,635mm64in |
| Rear track | - | 1,695mm67in |
| Ground clearance | 100mm4in | - |
| Trunk volume | 120L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | - |
| CO2 emissions | - | 495g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Koenigsegg CCX R 4.7 V8: Power / Torque
- Lamborghini Reventon 6.5 V12: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.7 V8 | 7,000 rpm | 5,600 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| LamborghiniReventon6.5 V12 | 8,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm | 8,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | KoenigseggCCXR 4.7 V8 | LamborghiniReventon6.5 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.0 s | 3.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.1 s | 3.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 8.9 s | 9.0 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 24.9 s | 31.2 s |
| Top speed | 400 km/h 249 mph | 340 km/h 211 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.8 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.7 s | 4.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.0 s | 7.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.0 s | 9.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.7 s | 10.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 221 km/h 138 mph | 223 km/h 138 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.7 V8 | 1,032 hp 770 kW |
| LamborghiniReventon6.5 V12 | 640 hp 477 kW |
Koenigsegg CCX R 4.7 V8 has 392 hp more than Lamborghini Reventon 6.5 V12.
The biggest power difference is between Lamborghini Reventon 6.5 V12 and Koenigsegg CCX R 4.7 V8: 392 hp (292 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.7 V8 | 1,060 Nm 782 lb-ft |
| LamborghiniReventon6.5 V12 | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.7 V8 | 1,280 kg 2,822 lb |
| LamborghiniReventon6.5 V12 | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.7 V8 | 400 km/h 249 mph |
| LamborghiniReventon6.5 V12 | 340 km/h 211 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.7 V8 | 3.1 s |
| LamborghiniReventon6.5 V12 | 3.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Koenigsegg CCX R 4.7 V8 and Lamborghini Reventon 6.5 V12: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.7 V8 | 22.0 L/100 km 10.7 mpg US 12.8 mpg UK |
| LamborghiniReventon6.5 V12 | 21.3 L/100 km 11.0 mpg US 13.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lamborghini Reventon 6.5 V12 and Koenigsegg CCX R 4.7 V8: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.7 V8 | 806 hp/t 601 kW/t 1.2 kg/hp |
| LamborghiniReventon6.5 V12 | 384 hp/t 287 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.7 V8 | 1,032 hp 770 kW | 3.1 s | 400 km/h 249 mph |
| LamborghiniReventon6.5 V12 | 640 hp 477 kW | 3.4 s | 340 km/h 211 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.7 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LamborghiniReventon6.5 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.7 V8 |
| 22.0 L/100 km 10.7 mpg US 12.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| LamborghiniReventon6.5 V12 |
| 21.3 L/100 km 11.0 mpg US 13.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Lamborghini Reventon 6.5 V12 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.7 V8 | 22.0 L/100 km 10.7 mpg US 12.8 mpg UK | 3.1 s |
| LamborghiniReventon6.5 V12 | 21.3 L/100 km 11.0 mpg US 13.3 mpg UK | 3.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.7 V8 | 806 hp/t 601 kW/t 1.2 kg/hp | 22.0 L/100 km 10.7 mpg US 12.8 mpg UK |
| LamborghiniReventon6.5 V12 | 384 hp/t 287 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp | 21.3 L/100 km 11.0 mpg US 13.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | KoenigseggCCXR 4.7 V8 | LamborghiniReventon6.5 V12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,032 hp 770 kW | 640 hp 477 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 1,060 Nm 782 lb-ft | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.1 s | 3.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 400 km/h 249 mph | 340 km/h 211 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,280 kg 2,822 lb | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 22.0 L/100 km 10.7 mpg US 12.8 mpg UK | 21.3 L/100 km 11.0 mpg US 13.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 318 km 198 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 495 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 120 L 4.2 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 806 hp/t 601 kW/t 1.2 kg/hp | 384 hp/t 287 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Koenigsegg CCX R 4.7 V8 | Lamborghini Reventon 6.5 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 22 L/100 km10.7 mpg US12.8 mpg UK | 21.3 L/100 km11 mpg US13.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 38.50 LC100 km | 37.28 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 61.96 LC100 mi | 59.99 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 3,300 L872 US gal726 UK gal | 3,195 L844 US gal703 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 5,775 LC/year | 5,591 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Koenigsegg CCX R 4.7 V8
- Has 392 hp more
- Has 400 Nm more
- Is 385 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 60 km/h (37 mph) higher top speed
- Has 422 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Lamborghini Reventon 6.5 V12
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























