Volkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Volkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020 2.0 TDIvsKia Stinger 2.0 GDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonKia Stinger
2.0 GDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI
- Fastest top speed234 km/h145 mph
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,649 kg3,635 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions134 g/km
- Best estimated range1,294 km804 mi
- Largest trunk1,557 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Kia Stinger 2.0 GDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.3 s
- Most powerful245 hp183 kW
- Best power-to-weight138 hp/t103 kW/t7.2 kg/hp
- Best performance score56/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | KiaStinger2.0 GDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 245hp183kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 353Nm260lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,649kg3,635lb | 1,770kg3,902lb |
| Gross weight | 2,280kg5,027lb | 2,185kg4,817lb |
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 117.5s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated | 100.9s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 6.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 37.6s Calculated | 32.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 5.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 14.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 243Nm/t162lb-ft/ton Calculated | 199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,294km804mi Calculated | 690km429mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,866mm192in | 4,830mm190in |
| Width | 1,871mm74in | 1,870mm74in |
| Height | 1,460mm57in | 1,400mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,835mm112in | 2,905mm114in |
| Front track | - | 1,596mm63in |
| Rear track | - | 1,619mm64in |
| Ground clearance | - | 130mm5in |
| Trunk volume | - | 406L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,557L | 1,114L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 134g/km | 186g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Kia Stinger 2.0 GDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | - | 1,750-3,500 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
| KiaStinger2.0 GDI | 6,200 rpm | 1,400-4,000 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | KiaStinger2.0 GDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 5.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 6.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 37.6 s | 32.7 s |
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 14.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 146 km/h 90 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| KiaStinger2.0 GDI | 245 hp 183 kW |
Kia Stinger 2.0 GDI has 45 hp more than Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI and Kia Stinger 2.0 GDI: 45 hp (34 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| KiaStinger2.0 GDI | 353 Nm 260 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 1,649 kg 3,635 lb |
| KiaStinger2.0 GDI | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| KiaStinger2.0 GDI | 233 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 7.4 s |
| KiaStinger2.0 GDI | 6.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Kia Stinger 2.0 GDI and Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
| KiaStinger2.0 GDI | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI and Kia Stinger 2.0 GDI: 3.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
| KiaStinger2.0 GDI | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 1,294 km 804 mi |
| KiaStinger2.0 GDI | 690 km 429 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.4 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| KiaStinger2.0 GDI | 245 hp 183 kW | 6.3 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| KiaStinger2.0 GDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| KiaStinger2.0 GDI |
| 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Kia Stinger 2.0 GDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| KiaStinger2.0 GDI | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
| KiaStinger2.0 GDI | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | KiaStinger2.0 GDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 245 hp 183 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 353 Nm 260 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 6.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,649 kg 3,635 lb | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,294 km 804 mi | 690 km 429 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 134 g/km | 186 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 1,557 L 55.0 cu ft | 406 L 14.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI | Kia Stinger 2.0 GDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK | 8.7 L/100 km27 mpg US32.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.92 LC100 km | 15.22 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi | 24.50 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal | 1,305 L345 US gal287 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,339 LC/year | 2,284 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI
- Has 47 Nm more
- Is 121 kg lighter
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 3.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 604 km (376 mi) more estimated range
- Has 1,151 L more trunk volume
- Emits 52 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Kia Stinger 2.0 GDI
- Has 45 hp more
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























