Maserati GranSport
Car comparison
Maserati GranSport 4.2 i V8 32VvsJaguar XK Coupe (X150) R 4.2 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XK Coupe (X150)
R 4.2 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Maserati GranSport 4.2 i V8 32V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Fastest top speed300 km/h186 mph Unrestricted290 km/h180 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,680 kg3,704 lb
- Largest trunk315 L
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score76/100
- Best practicality score48/100
Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) R 4.2 V8
- Most powerful416 hp310 kW
- Highest torque560 Nm413 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight245 hp/t183 kW/t4.1 kg/hp
- Best economy score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MaseratiGranSport4.2 i V8 32V | JaguarXK Coupe (X150)R 4.2 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 400hp298kW | 416hp310kW |
| Torque | 451Nm333lb-ft | 560Nm413lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,680kg3,704lb | 1,695kg3,737lb |
| Gross weight | 2,060kg4,542lb | 2,080kg4,586lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 75.2s99% target: 297 km/h / 185 mph Calculated | 68.1s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 5.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.9s Calculated | 17.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.6s Calculated | 4.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 19.1L/100 km12.3mpg US14.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.8s Calculated | 13.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 238hp/t178kW/t108hp/1000 lb Calculated | 245hp/t183kW/t111hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 268Nm/t180lb-ft/ton Calculated | 330Nm/t221lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 578km359mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,244cc259cu in | 4,196cc256cu in |
| Length | 4,523mm178in | 4,791mm189in |
| Width | 1,822mm72in | - |
| Height | 1,295mm51in | 1,322mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,660mm105in | 2,752mm108in |
| Front track | 1,525mm60in | - |
| Rear track | 1,538mm61in | - |
| Ground clearance | - | 120mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 315L | 300L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 88L | 71L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Maserati GranSport 4.2 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) R 4.2 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranSport4.2 i V8 32V | 7,000 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)R 4.2 V8 | 6,250 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MaseratiGranSport4.2 i V8 32V | JaguarXK Coupe (X150)R 4.2 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.6 s | 4.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 5.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.9 s | 17.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 8.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.9 s | 11.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.8 s | 13.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 185 km/h 115 mph | 176 km/h 109 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranSport4.2 i V8 32V | 400 hp 298 kW |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)R 4.2 V8 | 416 hp 310 kW |
Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) R 4.2 V8 has 16 hp more than Maserati GranSport 4.2 i V8 32V.
The biggest power difference is between Maserati GranSport 4.2 i V8 32V and Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) R 4.2 V8: 16 hp (12 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranSport4.2 i V8 32V | 451 Nm 333 lb-ft |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)R 4.2 V8 | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranSport4.2 i V8 32V | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)R 4.2 V8 | 1,695 kg 3,737 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranSport4.2 i V8 32V | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)R 4.2 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranSport4.2 i V8 32V | 4.9 s |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)R 4.2 V8 | 5.2 s |
Although Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) R 4.2 V8 has more power, Maserati GranSport 4.2 i V8 32V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Maserati GranSport 4.2 i V8 32V and Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) R 4.2 V8: 0.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranSport4.2 i V8 32V | 238 hp/t 178 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)R 4.2 V8 | 245 hp/t 183 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranSport4.2 i V8 32V | 400 hp 298 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)R 4.2 V8 | 416 hp 310 kW | 5.2 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranSport4.2 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)R 4.2 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MaseratiGranSport4.2 i V8 32V | JaguarXK Coupe (X150)R 4.2 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 400 hp 298 kW | 416 hp 310 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 451 Nm 333 lb-ft | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 5.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb | 1,695 kg 3,737 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 578 km 359 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 315 L 11.1 cu ft | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 238 hp/t 178 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 245 hp/t 183 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) R 4.2 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.53 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.64 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,845 L487 US gal406 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,229 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Maserati GranSport 4.2 i V8 32V
- Is 15 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 35 km/h (22 mph) higher top speed
- Has 15 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) R 4.2 V8
- Has 16 hp more
- Has 109 Nm more
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























