Maserati GranCabrio I
Car comparison
Maserati GranCabrio I 4.7vsJaguar XK Convertible (X150) R 4.2 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XK Convertible (X150)
R 4.2 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) R 4.2 V8
- Highest torque560 Nm413 lb-ft
- Lightest1,710 kg3,770 lb
- Best power-to-weight243 hp/t181 kW/t4.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23.0 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption19.1 L/100 km12.3 mpg US14.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range578 km359 mi
- Largest trunk200 L
- Best economy score74/100
Maserati GranCabrio I 4.7
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.3 s
- Fastest top speed283 km/h176 mph
- Most powerful440 hp328 kW
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score76/100
- Best practicality score44/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MaseratiGranCabrio I4.7 | JaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 440hp328kW | 416hp310kW |
| Torque | 490Nm361lb-ft | 560Nm413lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,887kg4,160lb | 1,710kg3,770lb |
| Gross weight | 1,980kg4,365lb | 2,120kg4,674lb |
| Top speed | 283 km/h 176 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 80.0s99% target: 280 km/h / 174 mph Calculated | 67.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.3s | 5.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.5s Calculated | 18.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.0s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 15.2L/100 km15.4mpg US18.5mpg UK | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 23.2L/100 km10.1mpg US12.2mpg UK | 19.1L/100 km12.3mpg US14.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.6L/100 km22.3mpg US26.8mpg UK | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.4s Calculated | 13.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 233hp/t174kW/t106hp/1000 lb Calculated | 243hp/t181kW/t110hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated | 327Nm/t219lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 492km306mi Calculated | 578km359mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,691cc286cu in | 4,196cc256cu in |
| Length | 4,881mm192in | 4,791mm189in |
| Width | 1,915mm75in | - |
| Height | 1,353mm53in | 1,329mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,942mm116in | 2,752mm108in |
| Front track | 1,586mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,590mm63in | - |
| Ground clearance | - | 120mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 173L | 200L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 283L |
| Doors | 3 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 75L | 71L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Maserati GranCabrio I 4.7: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) R 4.2 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranCabrio I4.7 | 7,000 rpm | 4,750 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| JaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V8 | 6,250 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MaseratiGranCabrio I4.7 | JaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.0 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.3 s | 5.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.5 s | 18.6 s |
| Top speed | 283 km/h 176 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.3 s | 11.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.4 s | 13.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 176 km/h 109 mph | 174 km/h 108 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranCabrio I4.7 | 440 hp 328 kW |
| JaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V8 | 416 hp 310 kW |
Maserati GranCabrio I 4.7 has 24 hp more than Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) R 4.2 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) R 4.2 V8 and Maserati GranCabrio I 4.7: 24 hp (18 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranCabrio I4.7 | 490 Nm 361 lb-ft |
| JaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V8 | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranCabrio I4.7 | 1,887 kg 4,160 lb |
| JaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V8 | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranCabrio I4.7 | 283 km/h 176 mph |
| JaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranCabrio I4.7 | 5.3 s |
| JaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V8 | 5.3 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranCabrio I4.7 | 15.2 L/100 km 15.4 mpg US 18.5 mpg UK |
| JaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V8 | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) R 4.2 V8 and Maserati GranCabrio I 4.7: 2.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranCabrio I4.7 | 233 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| JaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V8 | 243 hp/t 181 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranCabrio I4.7 | 492 km 306 mi |
| JaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V8 | 578 km 359 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranCabrio I4.7 | 440 hp 328 kW | 5.3 s | 283 km/h 176 mph |
| JaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V8 | 416 hp 310 kW | 5.3 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranCabrio I4.7 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranCabrio I4.7 |
| 15.2 L/100 km 15.4 mpg US 18.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V8 |
| 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) R 4.2 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranCabrio I4.7 | 15.2 L/100 km 15.4 mpg US 18.5 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
| JaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V8 | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranCabrio I4.7 | 233 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 15.2 L/100 km 15.4 mpg US 18.5 mpg UK |
| JaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V8 | 243 hp/t 181 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MaseratiGranCabrio I4.7 | JaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 440 hp 328 kW | 416 hp 310 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 490 Nm 361 lb-ft | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.3 s | 5.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 283 km/h 176 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,887 kg 4,160 lb | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 15.2 L/100 km 15.4 mpg US 18.5 mpg UK | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 492 km 306 mi | 578 km 359 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 173 L 6.1 cu ft | 200 L 7.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 233 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 243 hp/t 181 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati GranCabrio I 4.7 | Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) R 4.2 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 15.2 L/100 km15.4 mpg US18.5 mpg UK | 12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 26.65 LC100 km | 21.53 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 42.89 LC100 mi | 34.64 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,285 L604 US gal503 UK gal | 1,845 L487 US gal406 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,998 LC/year | 3,229 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Maserati GranCabrio I 4.7
- Has 24 hp more
- Has 23 km/h (14 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Jaguar XK Convertible (X150) R 4.2 V8
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 177 kg lighter
- Uses 2.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 86 km (53 mi) more estimated range
- Has 27 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























