Subaru WRX STI Sedan
Car comparison
Subaru WRX STI Sedan 2.5vsJaguar XJ (X358) 4.2 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XJ (X358)
4.2 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Subaru WRX STI Sedan 2.5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.2 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Lightest1,505 kg3,318 lb
- Best power-to-weight199 hp/t149 kW/t5.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.3 L/100 km22.8 mpg US27.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.8 L/100 km17.0 mpg US20.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
- Best overall score70/100
- Best performance score67/100
- Best economy score79/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Jaguar XJ (X358) 4.2 V8
- Highest torque411 Nm303 lb-ft
- Best estimated range746 km463 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | SubaruWRX STI Sedan2.5 | JaguarXJ (X358)4.2 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 298hp222kW |
| Torque | 407Nm300lb-ft | 411Nm303lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,505kg3,318lb | 1,603kg3,534lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,223kg4,901lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 49.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 68.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.2s | 6.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.8s Calculated | 20.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.0s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK | 16.7L/100 km14.1mpg US16.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.1s Calculated | 14.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 199hp/t149kW/t90hp/1000 lb Calculated | 186hp/t139kW/t84hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 270Nm/t181lb-ft/ton Calculated | 256Nm/t172lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 583km362mi Calculated | 746km463mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,457cc150cu in | 4,196cc256cu in |
| Length | 4,580mm180in | 5,091mm200in |
| Width | 1,795mm71in | 1,860mm73in |
| Height | 1,475mm58in | 1,462mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,625mm103in | 3,034mm119in |
| Front track | 1,530mm60in | 1,556mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,540mm61in | 1,546mm61in |
| Trunk volume | - | 470L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 85L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Subaru WRX STI Sedan 2.5: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XJ (X358) 4.2 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SubaruWRX STI Sedan2.5 | 6,000 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| JaguarXJ (X358)4.2 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SubaruWRX STI Sedan2.5 | JaguarXJ (X358)4.2 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.0 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.2 s | 6.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.8 s | 20.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.2 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.1 s | 14.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 184 km/h 114 mph | 168 km/h 104 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruWRX STI Sedan2.5 | 300 hp 224 kW |
| JaguarXJ (X358)4.2 V8 | 298 hp 222 kW |
Subaru WRX STI Sedan 2.5 has 2 hp more than Jaguar XJ (X358) 4.2 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XJ (X358) 4.2 V8 and Subaru WRX STI Sedan 2.5: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruWRX STI Sedan2.5 | 407 Nm 300 lb-ft |
| JaguarXJ (X358)4.2 V8 | 411 Nm 303 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruWRX STI Sedan2.5 | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb |
| JaguarXJ (X358)4.2 V8 | 1,603 kg 3,534 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruWRX STI Sedan2.5 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXJ (X358)4.2 V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruWRX STI Sedan2.5 | 5.2 s |
| JaguarXJ (X358)4.2 V8 | 6.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Subaru WRX STI Sedan 2.5 and Jaguar XJ (X358) 4.2 V8: 1.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruWRX STI Sedan2.5 | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK |
| JaguarXJ (X358)4.2 V8 | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Subaru WRX STI Sedan 2.5 and Jaguar XJ (X358) 4.2 V8: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruWRX STI Sedan2.5 | 199 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
| JaguarXJ (X358)4.2 V8 | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruWRX STI Sedan2.5 | 583 km 362 mi |
| JaguarXJ (X358)4.2 V8 | 746 km 463 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SubaruWRX STI Sedan2.5 | 300 hp 224 kW | 5.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXJ (X358)4.2 V8 | 298 hp 222 kW | 6.6 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SubaruWRX STI Sedan2.5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXJ (X358)4.2 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SubaruWRX STI Sedan2.5 |
| 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXJ (X358)4.2 V8 |
| 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Subaru WRX STI Sedan 2.5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SubaruWRX STI Sedan2.5 | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
| JaguarXJ (X358)4.2 V8 | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SubaruWRX STI Sedan2.5 | 199 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK |
| JaguarXJ (X358)4.2 V8 | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SubaruWRX STI Sedan2.5 | JaguarXJ (X358)4.2 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 298 hp 222 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 407 Nm 300 lb-ft | 411 Nm 303 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.2 s | 6.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb | 1,603 kg 3,534 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 583 km 362 mi | 746 km 463 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 199 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Subaru WRX STI Sedan 2.5 | Jaguar XJ (X358) 4.2 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.3 L/100 km22.8 mpg US27.4 mpg UK | 11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.03 LC100 km | 19.95 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.01 LC100 mi | 32.11 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,545 L408 US gal340 UK gal | 1,710 L452 US gal376 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,704 LC/year | 2,993 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Subaru WRX STI Sedan 2.5
- Has 2 hp more
- Is 98 kg lighter
- Is 1.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Jaguar XJ (X358) 4.2 V8
- Has 4 Nm more
- Has 163 km (101 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























