Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 V8vsJaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015 5.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015
5.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.1 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful476 hp355 kW
- Highest torque650 Nm479 lb-ft
- Lightest1,640 kg3,616 lb
- Best power-to-weight290 hp/t216 kW/t3.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions192 g/km
- Best estimated range805 km500 mi
- Best overall score80/100
- Best performance score84/100
- Best economy score85/100
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 5.0 V8
- Best practicality score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 V8 | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 476hp355kW | 470hp350kW |
| Torque | 650Nm479lb-ft | 575Nm424lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,640kg3,616lb | 1,875kg4,134lb |
| Gross weight | 2,175kg4,795lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 35.6s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 51.3s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.1s | 5.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.5s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.9s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 11.8s Calculated | 13.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 290hp/t216kW/t132hp/1000 lb Calculated | 251hp/t187kW/t114hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 396Nm/t265lb-ft/ton Calculated | 307Nm/t205lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 805km500mi Calculated | 721km448mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,982cc243cu in | 5,000cc305cu in |
| Length | 4,756mm187in | 5,130mm202in |
| Width | 1,839mm72in | 1,899mm75in |
| Height | 1,426mm56in | 1,460mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,840mm112in | 3,032mm119in |
| Front track | 1,609mm63in | 1,626mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,546mm61in | 1,604mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 435L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | 192g/km | 264g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 V8: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 V8 | 5,500-6,250 rpm | 1,750-4,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 | 6,000-6,500 rpm | 2,000-5,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 V8 | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.9 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.1 s | 5.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.5 s | 15.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.9 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.1 s | 11.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.8 s | 13.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 203 km/h 126 mph | 184 km/h 115 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 V8 | 476 hp 355 kW |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 | 470 hp 350 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 V8 has 6 hp more than Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 5.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 5.0 V8 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 V8: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 V8 | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 | 575 Nm 424 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 V8 | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 V8 | 4.1 s |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 | 5.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 V8 and Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 5.0 V8: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 V8 | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 V8 and Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 5.0 V8: 2.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 V8 | 290 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 | 251 hp/t 187 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 V8 | 805 km 500 mi |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 | 721 km 448 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 V8 | 476 hp 355 kW | 4.1 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 | 470 hp 350 kW | 5.2 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 V8 |
| 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 |
| 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 V8 | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 4.1 s |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 V8 | 290 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 | 251 hp/t 187 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 V8 | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 476 hp 355 kW | 470 hp 350 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | 575 Nm 424 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.1 s | 5.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 805 km 500 mi | 721 km 448 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 192 g/km | 264 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 435 L 15.4 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 290 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 251 hp/t 187 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 V8 | Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK | 11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.35 LC100 km | 19.43 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.09 LC100 mi | 31.26 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal | 1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,153 LC/year | 2,914 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 V8
- Has 6 hp more
- Has 75 Nm more
- Is 235 kg lighter
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 40 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 84 km (52 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 72 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 5.0 V8
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























