Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 V8vsJaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015 5.0 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205)

AMG C 63 V8

476 hp3982 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2015-2018
VS

Jaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015

5.0 V8

470 hp5000 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticSuperchargedSedan2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.1 s
  • Fastest top speed
    265 km/h
    165 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    476 hp
    355 kW
  • Highest torque
    650 Nm
    479 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,640 kg
    3,616 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    290 hp/t
    216 kW/t
    3.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.2 L/100 km
    28.7 mpg US
    34.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    192 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    805 km
    500 mi
  • Best overall score
    80/100
  • Best performance score
    84/100
  • Best economy score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 V8JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
Power
476hp355kW
470hp350kW
Torque
650Nm479lb-ft
575Nm424lb-ft
Curb weight
1,640kg3,616lb
1,875kg4,134lb
Gross weight
2,175kg4,795lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
35.6s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
51.3s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.1s
5.2s
0-200 km/h
11.5s
Calculated
15.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.9s
Calculated
5.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
11.8s
Calculated
13.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
290hp/t216kW/t132hp/1000 lb
Calculated
251hp/t187kW/t114hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
396Nm/t265lb-ft/ton
Calculated
307Nm/t205lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
805km500mi
Calculated
721km448mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,982cc243cu in
5,000cc305cu in
Length
4,756mm187in
5,130mm202in
Width
1,839mm72in
1,899mm75in
Height
1,426mm56in
1,460mm57in
Wheelbase
2,840mm112in
3,032mm119in
Front track
1,609mm63in
1,626mm64in
Rear track
1,546mm61in
1,604mm63in
Trunk volume
435L
-
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
66L
80L
CO2 emissions
192g/km
264g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 V8Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 5.0 V8PowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 V8: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 V85,500-6,250 rpm1,750-4,500 rpm6,500 rpm
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V86,000-6,500 rpm2,000-5,500 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 V8JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.9 s
5.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.1 s
5.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
11.5 s
15.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.2 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
5.4 s
6.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.9 s
8.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.1 s
11.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.8 s
13.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
203 km/h
126 mph
184 km/h
115 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 V8
476 hp
355 kW
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
470 hp
350 kW

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 V8 has 6 hp more than Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 5.0 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 5.0 V8 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 V8: 6 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 V8
650 Nm
479 lb-ft
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
575 Nm
424 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 V8
1,640 kg
3,616 lb
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
1,875 kg
4,134 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 V8
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 V8 and Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 5.0 V8: 1.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 V8
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 V8 and Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 5.0 V8: 2.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 V8
290 hp/t
216 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
251 hp/t
187 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 V8
805 km
500 mi
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
721 km
448 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 V8
476 hp
355 kW
4.1 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
470 hp
350 kW
5.2 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 V8
Power
476 hp
355 kW
0-100 km/h4.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
435 L
15.4 cu ft
Length
4,756 mm
187.2 in
Height
1,426 mm
56.1 in
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
Power
470 hp
350 kW
0-100 km/h5.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,130 mm
202.0 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 V8
Power
476 hp
355 kW
0-100 km/h4.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
Power
470 hp
350 kW
0-100 km/h5.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 V8
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
4.1 s
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
5.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 V8
290 hp/t
216 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
251 hp/t
187 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 V8JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
Power
476 hp
355 kW
470 hp
350 kW
Torque
650 Nm
479 lb-ft
575 Nm
424 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.1 s
5.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,640 kg
3,616 lb
1,875 kg
4,134 lb
Fuel consumption
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
435 L
15.4 cu ft
Length
4,756 mm
187.2 in
Height
1,426 mm
56.1 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,130 mm
202.0 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in
Range score
805 km
500 mi
721 km
448 mi
CO2 score
192 g/km
264 g/km
Trunk score
435 L
15.4 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
290 hp/t
216 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
251 hp/t
187 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 V8Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 5.0 V8
Consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.35 LC100 km19.43 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.09 LC100 mi31.26 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,153 LC/year2,914 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 V8

  • Has 6 hp more
  • Has 75 Nm more
  • Is 235 kg lighter
  • Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 2.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 40 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 84 km (52 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 72 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 V8
Jaguar XJ (X351) 5.0 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 V8 vs Jaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015 5.0 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster