Jaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015
Car comparison
Jaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015 2.0vsLexus ES VI (XV60) · Facelift 2015 350 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLexus ES VI (XV60) · Facelift 2015
350 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0
- Fastest top speed241 km/h150 mph
- Highest torque340 Nm251 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions199 g/km
- Best estimated range952 km592 mi
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Lexus ES VI (XV60) Facelift 2015 350 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Most powerful249 hp186 kW
- Lightest1,600 kg3,527 lb
- Best power-to-weight156 hp/t116 kW/t6.4 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | LexusES VI (XV60)Facelift 2015350 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 249hp186kW |
| Torque | 340Nm251lb-ft | 183Nm135lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,735kg3,825lb | 1,600kg3,527lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,130kg4,696lb |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 80.2s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 61.9s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.6s Calculated | 29.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 13.4L/100 km17.6mpg US21.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated | 156hp/t116kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated | 114Nm/t77lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 952km592mi Calculated | 684km425mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 3,456cc211cu in |
| Length | 5,130mm202in | 4,915mm194in |
| Width | 1,899mm75in | 1,820mm72in |
| Height | 1,460mm57in | 1,450mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 3,032mm119in | 2,820mm111in |
| Front track | 1,626mm64in | 1,590mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,604mm63in | 1,575mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 152mm6in |
| Trunk volume | - | 490L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 65L |
| CO2 emissions | 199g/km | 224g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0: Power / Torque
- Lexus ES VI (XV60) Facelift 2015 350 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 5,500 rpm | 2,000-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| LexusES VI (XV60)Facelift 2015350 V6 | 6,200 rpm | 6,200 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | LexusES VI (XV60)Facelift 2015350 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.5 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.6 s | 29.0 s |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 240 hp 179 kW |
| LexusES VI (XV60)Facelift 2015350 V6 | 249 hp 186 kW |
Lexus ES VI (XV60) Facelift 2015 350 V6 has 9 hp more than Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0 and Lexus ES VI (XV60) Facelift 2015 350 V6: 9 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
| LexusES VI (XV60)Facelift 2015350 V6 | 183 Nm 135 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 1,735 kg 3,825 lb |
| LexusES VI (XV60)Facelift 2015350 V6 | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| LexusES VI (XV60)Facelift 2015350 V6 | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 7.9 s |
| LexusES VI (XV60)Facelift 2015350 V6 | 7.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lexus ES VI (XV60) Facelift 2015 350 V6 and Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| LexusES VI (XV60)Facelift 2015350 V6 | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0 and Lexus ES VI (XV60) Facelift 2015 350 V6: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
| LexusES VI (XV60)Facelift 2015350 V6 | 156 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 952 km 592 mi |
| LexusES VI (XV60)Facelift 2015350 V6 | 684 km 425 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 240 hp 179 kW | 7.9 s | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| LexusES VI (XV60)Facelift 2015350 V6 | 249 hp 186 kW | 7.5 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LexusES VI (XV60)Facelift 2015350 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| LexusES VI (XV60)Facelift 2015350 V6 |
| 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
| LexusES VI (XV60)Facelift 2015350 V6 | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| LexusES VI (XV60)Facelift 2015350 V6 | 156 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | LexusES VI (XV60)Facelift 2015350 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 249 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | 183 Nm 135 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,735 kg 3,825 lb | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 952 km 592 mi | 684 km 425 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 199 g/km | 224 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 490 L 17.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 156 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0 | Lexus ES VI (XV60) Facelift 2015 350 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK | 9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.70 LC100 km | 16.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi | 26.76 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal | 1,425 L376 US gal313 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,205 LC/year | 2,494 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0
- Has 157 Nm more
- Has 16 km/h (10 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 268 km (167 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 25 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Lexus ES VI (XV60) Facelift 2015 350 V6
- Has 9 hp more
- Is 135 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























